Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kewarganegaraan QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia International Journal of Religion Education and Law
Carissa Patricia Hong
Universitas Tarumanagara
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Review of the Authority of the House of Representatives in Removing Constitutional Court Judges Carissa Patricia Hong; Luverne Pujian Quinn; Jelita Safitri Ananda; Omega Kharisma; Tundjung Herning Sitabuana
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.472

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia is a high state institution in the Indonesian constitutional system which is the holder of judicial authority together with the Supreme Court. In the dismissal of the Constitutional Court Judges it is very urgent to decide because it relates to the independence of the Constitutional Court Judges. The longer the case, the political pressure from the DPR as a fellow state high institution will result in the instability of the legal system in Indonesia. Moreover, at this time the DPR has confirmed that it will not annul the replacement of Constitutional Justice Aswanto, so it is important that the DPR's actions be immediately tried by the judicial authority, in casu the Constitutional Court. The formulation of the problem in this study is what is the authority of the DPR in removing Constitutional Court judges? This study uses normative research with descriptive research specifications. The province's request for an examination is very priority and also so that the Court suspends all actions aimed at replacing a serving Constitutional Justice in a manner or procedure outside of the provisions in Article 23 of the Constitutional Court Law, and it is also not justified to issue a stipulation that legalizes the action as the applicant requested in the petitum provision. The petition of the applicant is based on strong reasons which are non-nobis solum sed omnibus (not for us alone, but for everyone), because the independence of the MK as guardian of constitutional rights is at stake.
Juridical Analysis of the Distribution of Joint Assets in Divorce According to Indonesian Positive Law Carissa Patricia Hong; Jelita Safitri Ananda; Muh. Abriel Givari Riser
IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law Vol 2, No 2 (2023): August 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/ijrael.v2i2.663

Abstract

In a divorce, there is a process of dividing joint assets. Issues regarding joint assets often occur between ex-husbands and ex-wives. For Muslims, the provision for sharing joint assets is contained in article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) that "widows or widowers who are divorced, each is entitled to half of the joint assets as long as the marriage agreement is not specified otherwise". Referring to this article, it means that a husband and wife who are divorced are entitled to half or half of the joint property as long as there is no marriage agreement. Meanwhile, for adherents of other religions it is regulated in the Criminal Code which is stated in Article 128 of the Civil Code. According to the Civil Code, division can be made based on the distribution of evidence submitted by plaintiffs and defendants. Basically, these two articles stipulate that in the event of a divorce, the property is divided 50:50. The division of joint assets can be filed together with a divorce suit and does not have to wait for a divorce decision from the court. The formulation of the problem in this study is a juridical analysis of the division of joint assets in divorce according to Indonesian positive law. This research uses normative research with descriptive research specifications and uses primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials which are arranged systematically, reviewed, and then concluded.
Pandangan Women's Charter 1961 pada Perkawinan Beda Agama (Komparasi Indonesia dan Singapura) Imelda Martinelli; Olga Abigail Sugama; Carissa Patricia Hong
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6403

Abstract

Abstrak Beragamnya agama dan aliran kepercayaan di Indonesia, memungkinkan perkawinan beda agama terlaksana. Perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia bukan merupakan hal baru yang terjadi di antara masyarakat yang multikultural. Hal ini bukan berarti tidak menjadi sebuah permasalahan. Perkawinan di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Akan tetapi, Indonesia tidak memiliki hukum yang mengatur secara rinci mengenai perkawinan beda agama. Sedangkan, Terdapat negara yang mengatur mengenai perkawinan beda agama salah satunya ialah Singapura. Singapura sendiri memiliki 2 Undang-undang yang mengatur mengenai perkawinan yaitu hukum perkawinan islam (AMLA 1966) dan women’s charter 1961. Perkawinan beda agama di Singapura diperbolehkan dan juga mendapat pengakuan hukum dari negara tetapi berbeda bagi calon pengantin muslim yang ingin menikah dengan calon pengantin non-muslim di Singapura. Terdapat beberapa syarat ketat bagi yang ingin melangsungkan perkawinan beda agama terutama muslim dan non-muslim. Jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan menerapkan data hukum sekunder yang terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Kata Kunci: Perkawinan, Beda agama, women’s charter 1961, AMLA 1966 Abstract The diversity of religions and sects of belief in Indonesia makes it possible for interfaith marriages to take place. Interfaith marriage in Indonesia is not a new thing that occurs among a multicultural society. This does not mean that it does not become a problem. Marriage in Indonesia is regulated by Law No.1 of 1974. However, Indonesia does not have a law that regulates in detail about interfaith marriages. Meanwhile, there are countries that regulate interfaith marriages, one of which is Singapore. Singapore itself has 2 laws governing marriage, namely Islamic marriage law (AMLA 1966) and women's charter 1961. Interfaith marriages in Singapore are allowed and also receive legal recognition from the state but it is different for Muslim brides who want to marry non-Muslim brides in Singapore. There are several strict requirements for those who want to enter into an interfaith marriage, especially Muslims and non-Muslims. This journal uses normative legal research methods or doctrinal legal research by applying secondary legal data and using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Keywords: Marriage, interfaith, women’s charter 1961, AMLA 1966
Co-Authors Imelda Martinelli Jelita Safitri Ananda Luverne Pujian Quinn Muh. Abriel Givari Riser Olga Abigail Sugama Omega Kharisma Tundjung Herning Sitabuana