Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ilmu dan Budaya Populis : Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Jurnal Partisipatoris International Journal of Education and Social Science (IJESS) Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture
Ganjar Razuni
Universitas Nasional
Arts Humanities Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
NO AGRARIAN REFORM: REVOLUTIE WITHOUT REVOLUTION? Razuni, Ganjar; Pramanti, Adilita
Jurnal Partisipatoris Vol 2, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Partisipatoris
Publisher : University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/jp.v2i1.11742

Abstract

RI?s independence is a revolution to form a nation and state with an independentsocial structure. One of the instruments of de-colonization of the Indonesian peopleis the Agrarian Revolution. The matter of study in this paper is why, since Sokarnostepped down, the implementation of agrarian reform became half-hearted. Thiswriting method with a literature study through historical, descriptive analysis. Theresult reveals there has not been a fundamental change in the basic socio-agrarianstructure in Indonesia, and people fought for it from 2014 until now
PARADIGMA DEPENDENCIA DALAM MEMAHAMI REALITAS KEMERDEKAAN BANGSA DAN NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA PASCA REFORMASI 1998 Ganjar Razuni
Jurnal Ilmu dan Budaya Vol 40, No 50 (2016): Vol. 40, No 50 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (126.345 KB) | DOI: 10.47313/jib.v40i50.253

Abstract

Indonesia’s political reform starting in 1998 has been a crucial path that poses problematic especially in terms of economic ideology and its road to development. This paper is an account that seeks to critically look into the negative move to ultra-liberal inclination of the reform with close collaboration with powerfully financial forces. The theories used are dependency theory and Feith & Castles’s concepts of five interwoven ideologies in Indonesia’s politics. It is the writer’s solution to the problem to endorse President Joko Widodo’s adoption of Sukarno’s Nawacita that calls for the path of self-reliant development and guarantees the re-invention of political philosophy of Pancasila.
NO AGRARIAN REFORM: REVOLUTIE WITHOUT REVOLUTION? Ganjar Razuni; Adilita Pramanti
Jurnal Partisipatoris Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Maret 2020
Publisher : University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/jp.v2i1.11742

Abstract

RI’s independence is a revolution to form a nation and state with an independentsocial structure. One of the instruments of de-colonization of the Indonesian peopleis the Agrarian Revolution. The matter of study in this paper is why, since Sokarnostepped down, the implementation of agrarian reform became half-hearted. Thiswriting method with a literature study through historical, descriptive analysis. Theresult reveals there has not been a fundamental change in the basic socio-agrarianstructure in Indonesia, and people fought for it from 2014 until now
Studi Kritis atas Pemikiran Notonagoro tentang Pancasila sebagai Dasar Negara Razuni, Ganjar
Populis : Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47313/pjsh.v9i1.3663

Abstract

Notonagoro is a Pancasila thinker who has initiated a scientific approach in studying Pancasila. The scientific approach in question is the formulation of the legal philosophy of Pancasila and the human philosophy of Pancasila. The legal philosophy of Pancasila refers to the idea of the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution as a Staatfundamentalnorm that cannot be changed by legal procedures. While the human philosophy of Pancasila refers to the formulation of the essence (core-content-absolute) of Pancasila, namely human monodualism as a source for the unity of the Pancasila precepts (Eka-Pancasila). This critical study aims to criticize some of the weaknesses and inconsistencies in Notonagoro's thought with the aim of clarifying things that are formulated incorrectly, using the method of comparison of character thoughts carried out from literature studies, document studies, and archives needed to criticize Notonagoro's construction of thoughts and ways of thinking about Pancasila and at the same time see its relevance in the current era. The theory used in this writing is as stated by David Bourchier (2007) in the New Order Version of Pancasila, regarding the purification of Pancasila, that the concept of Pancasila of the New Order era was developed with purer claims than the concept of Pancasila of the Old Order era. The results of this literature study show that Notonagoro's thoughts on the history of the birth of Pancasila have inconsistencies. In the era before the New Order (namely the era of Western-style Parliamentary Democracy (3 November 1959 – 5 July 1959 / Presidential Decree and the era of Guided Democracy (5 July 1959 – 12 March 1967) Notonagoro claimed Sukarno as the creator (material-dimension) of Pancasila. While in the New Order era, Notonagoro removed Sukarno from all his explanations regarding the history of the formation of Pancasila. Thus, a critical approach to Notonagoro's thinking and way of thinking is needed which becomes legitimacy for the development of Pancasila discourse in the New Order era and its current relevance to the ideological and political conditions of the nation and Indonesian statehood in the form of liberalization of understanding and awareness of the ideology of Pancasila after the 1998 Reformation.   Abstrak Notonagoro merupakan pemikir Pancasila yang telah mengawali pendekatan ilmiah dalam mempelajari Pancasila. Pendekatan ilmiah yang dimaksud adalah perumusan filsafat hukum Pancasila dan filsafat manusia Pancasila. Filsafat hukum Pancasila mengacu pada gagasan tentang Pembukaan UUD 1945 sebagai Pokok Kaidah Fundamental Negara (Staatfundamentalnorm) yang tidak bisa diubah oleh prosedur hukum. Sedangkan filsafat manusia Pancasila mengacu pada perumusan hakikat (inti-isi-mutlak) Pancasila, yakni monodualisme manusia sebagai sumber bagi kesatuan sila-sila Pancasila (Eka-Pancasila). Studi kritis ini bertujuan untuk mengkritik terhadap beberapa kelemahan dan inkonsistensi atas pemikiran Notonagoro dengan tujuan menjernihkan hal-hal yang dirumuskan secara kurang tepat, dengan menggunakan metode perbandingan pemikiran tokoh yang dilakukan dari studi pustaka, studi dokumen, dan arsip yang diperlukan untuk mengkritisi konstruksi pemikiran dan cara berpikir Notonagoro tentang Pancasila dan sekaligus melihat relevansinya pada era kini. Teori yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini sebagaimana dinyatakan oleh David Bourchier (2007) dalam Pancasila versi Orde Baru, mengenai purifikasi terhadap Pancasila, bahwa dikembangkannya konsep Pancasila era Orde baru dengan klaim lebih murni dibandingkan dengan konsep Pancasila era Orde Lama. Hasil studi pustaka ini memperlihatkan, bahwa pemikirann Notonagoro tentang sejarah kelahiran Pancasila, memiliki inkonsistensi. Di era sebelum Orde Baru (yakni era Demokrasi Parlementer ala Barat 3 November 1959 – 5 Juli 1959/Dekrit Presiden dan era Demokrasi Terpimpin (5 Juli 1959-12 Maret 1967) Notonagoro mendaulat Soekarno sebagai pencipta (dimensi-material) Pancasila. Sedangkan di era Orde Baru, Notonagoro menghapus Soekarno dari semua penjelasannya mengenai sejarah pembentukan Pancasila. Dengan demikian, diperlukan pendekatan kritis terhadap pemikiran dan cara berpikir Notonagoro yang menjadi legitimasi bagi pengembangan wacana Pancasila di era Orde Baru dan relevansinya saat ini dengan kondisi ideologis dan politik bangsa serta kenegaraan Indonesia berupa liberalisasi pemahaman dan pengamalan ideologi Pancasila pasca Reformasi 1998.
BUNG KARNO’s POLITICAL THOUGHT ACCORDING TO PANCASILA: A Study of Bung Karno’s Speech on June 1, 1945, and the President Soekarno/Bung Karno’s Pancasila Course Throughout 1958-1959 Razuni, Ganjar
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) October
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jwp.v8i2.50119

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of Bung Karno’s Pancasila concept, tracing its origins from his pivotal June 1, 1945 speech and the comprehensive elucidation of Pancasila during the 1958 Pancasila Course, a crucial moment in shaping its official formulation. Pancasila has become an enduring cornerstone of Indonesian ideology. This prompts a closer examination of Sukarno’s political ideals. This study scrutinizes Bung Karno’s Pancasila ideology within the context of his political philosophy. Methodologically, this article employs a Qualitative-Descriptive approach, primarily drawing on literature and documentary sources. The concept of deconstruction has also used in this article. The findings underscore how Sukarno’s political convictions found expression in Pancasila. His political thought was deeply influenced by Indonesia’s social and political landscape, emphasizing the nation’s diverse yet interconnected destiny and history. Sukarno ingeniously infused this diversity with spiritual unity, encapsulated in the five principles known as “Pancasila.” For Sukarno, Pancasila wasn’t theoretical; it was his practical political tool to manage diversity and avert polarization among Indonesian citizens. The first principle, “Believe in One Supreme God,” was particularly pivotal, serving as the foundation on which the others relied to maintain their integrity. This study sheds light on how Pancasila became more than just a concept; it was Sukarno’s practical response to the complexities of Indonesia’s socio-political landscape, emphasizing unity amidst diversity.
Pancasila Democracy According to Sukarno's Thought and its Potential for Formulation a New Model of Indonesian Democracy Razuni, Ganjar
IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science Vol 5 No 1 (2024): VOL 5 NO 1 APRIL 2024
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL PENELITI EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN TEKNOLOGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/ijess.v5i1.255

Abstract

Until now, the concept of Pancasila democracy has not been formulated properly and comprehensively. Moreover, this formulation is based on the thoughts of the Pancasila explorers, namely; Ir. Sukarno. The absence of a formulation of the democratic concept of Pancasila based on Sukarno's thinking is caused by the process of dehistoricization of Pancasila that has occurred since the New Order. In fact, both in his Speech on June 1 1945 and at the Pancasila Course Session on People's Sovereignty Principles on July 22 1958, Sukarno explained his various thoughts about the principles of democracy in Pancasila. Sukarno's thoughts on Pancasila democracy have potential for the formulation of a new model of Pancasila Democracy, which is different from other models of democracy, especially the liberal democracy model. Therefore, the formulation of a new Pancasila model of democracy based on Sukarno's thinking is an urgent scientific need and is our common concern.
Mobilization and Control: Ethnic Political in Local Parliament Members Election in Indonesia Af Sigit Rochadi; Diana Fawzia; Ganjar Razuni
Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024): March 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v16i1.6488

Abstract

This research aims to describe and analyze the mobilization and control of ethnic ties in politics.Ethnic mobilization is prevalent in the era of Indonesian democracy, specifically at local level, as evidenced by the increasing demands for forming new autonomous regions. Various regions implement restrictions on labor externally and prioritize local ethnicities to become civil servants. These phenomena give rise to paguyuban, showing ethnic communities, and political mobilization. Therefore, this study aimed to discuss the phenomena of ethnic mobilization in Batam City, Indonesia. The city has become an industrial region crowded with local and foreign companies, exhibiting contrasting phenomena, such as industrialization, democracy, and ethnic mobilization. Data was collected by interviewing leaders of the North Sumatra Family Association ethnic community, Chair of the Malay Traditional Institution, East Java Community Association, leaders of political parties and members of local parliament (Golkar Party, PDIP, PKS, PSI). The result showed that ethnic mobilization in Indonesian local political occurs by activating differences through politicians. Paguyubans are controlled by leveraging ties, indebtedness, and money political. It persists due to the inheritance from the Dutch colonial government, decentralization that motivates the diversification of local elites, and the needs of local elites to attain political positions. Furthermore, ethnic political is not a phenomenon unique to new democratic states, necessitating a reevaluation of mobilization theories within nations.
Co-Authors Adilita Pramanti AF Sigit Rochadi Diana Fawzia Pramanti, Adilita