Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Examining the Role of International Human Rights Tribunals in Promoting Accountability for Human Rights Violations Yolanda Mona Salainti
The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 03 (2023): The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights (ESLHR)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/eslhr.v1i03.87

Abstract

This study investigates the crucial role of international human rights courts in advancing accountability for human rights abuses. Its primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of these tribunals in holding accountable those — individuals, states, and non-state actors are to blame for major human rights violations. As part of the research methodology, relevant literature, case studies, and legal decisions from international human rights tribunals are thoroughly examined. The International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Court of Justice, and local human rights courts are all part of this. The scope of the investigation includes War crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity, torture, and enforced disappearances. The findings underscore the substantial contribution made by international human rights courts in ensuring justice, truth-seeking, and redress for victims of human rights abuses. These tribunals have played a pivotal role in establishing legal precedents, clarifying the extent of human rights obligations, and fostering international cooperation to address impunity. The study also explores the challenges confronted by international human rights courts, including limited jurisdiction, enforcement capacity, and political opposition. Additionally, it examines potential synergies between international tribunals and national justice systems to strengthen accountability mechanisms at both the international and domestic levels. The findings of this study have significant implications for policymakers, individuals who advocate for human rights, and those who work in the legal field because they highlight the importance of a powerful and independent international human rights court in promoting accountability and providing justice for victims of human rights violations all over the world.
Kurangnya Perhatian Orang Tua Terhadap Pergaulan Bebas Pelajar di Kelurahan Watulambot Salainti, Yolanda; Pijoh, Feibe Engeline; Mongdong, Novita; Mesra, Romi
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 7, No 2 (2023): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) (Maret)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v7i2.4681

Abstract

Free association that occurs in Watulambot Village needs serious handling because this is very important for the better future of students. deviant behavior that occurs will only bring many bad effects if not handled because there will be more problems that arise from association free among students. The research method used in this study is a qualitative research method. Data collection techniques in this study were carried out by interviews and observation. Data analysis techniques in this study used data analysis techniques from Miles and Hubermen, including data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing / verification. The results of this study are: the factors that cause promiscuity among students are cultural shifts, lack of attention from parents, and close friends. The impact of promiscuity among students is decreasing school achievement, dropping out of school, and getting pregnant out of wedlock
Perlindungan Warga Sipil Dalam Konflik Bersenjata (Studi Kasus Penggunaan Asas Pembedaan Dalam Konflik Di Suriah) Lombok, Lesza Leonardo; Singkoh, Angel Christi; Salainti, Yolanda
INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law Vol 2 No 1 (2025): INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Pusat Kajian - Universitas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70358/invention.v2i1.1471

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji perlindungan warga sipil dalam konflik bersenjata di Suriah melalui penerapan asas pembedaan dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Asas ini mengharuskan pihak yang bertikai membedakan antara kombatan dan warga sipil serta target militer dan objek sipil. Namun, dalam praktiknya, sering terjadi pelanggaran yang mengakibatkan tingginya korban sipil. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengenal isi Konvensi Jenewa 1949 dan Protokol Tambahan 1977. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa meskipun regulasi hukum internasional telah menetapkan perlindungan, pelanggaran masih marak terjadi. Untuk itu, peneliti merekomendasikan penguatan pengawasan internasional, edukasi hukum humaniter, serta sanksi tegas bagi pelaku pelanggaran guna meningkatkan perlindungan warga sipil
PELANGGARAN TERHADAP HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KORPORASI MENURUT PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Juvelentina Claudia Gabriela Ugu; Delbert C. H. Mongan; Yolanda Salainti
Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026 : Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science
Publisher : PT. Lembaga Penerbit Penelitian Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65244/jggls.v2i1.404

Abstract

Perlindungan hak desain industri bertujuan untuk memajukan industri yang mampu bersaing di tingkat nasional dan internasional melalui penciptaan iklim yang mendorong kreativitas dan inovasi masyarakat sebagai bagian dari sistem Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Perlindungan hukum menjadi penting untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak pendesain atas karya yang dihasilkannya, mengingat masih banyak terjadi pelanggaran hak desain industri di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk tindak pidana dan sanksi dalam perlindungan hak desain industri serta pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi atas pelanggaran tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak pidana desain industri meliputi pelanggaran hak eksklusif pendesain, penghapusan nama pendesain, serta pembocoran rahasia permohonan. Pelanggaran tersebut dikenakan sanksi pidana penjara dan/atau denda sesuai UU No. 31 Tahun 2000, serta dapat dipertanggungjawabkan kepada korporasi maupun pengurusnya.
Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia di Era Digital: Jaminan Konstitusional, Pembatasan yang Sah, dan Arah Reformasi Regulasi Indrasatya Octavianus Nasirun; Yolanda Salainti; Hendrasari B. Rawung; Lutfia Harimu; Ridho Pakaya
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Agustus: Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2605

Abstract

Freedom of opinion is an essential constitutional right for democratic accountability, citizen participation, and the exchange of ideas in digital public spaces. This right is guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and various international human rights instruments that Indonesia has ratified. However, the expansion of social media, disinformation, hate speech, doxing, cyberharassment, and inconsistent law enforcement have made its protections even more complex. Tensions arise between the need to maintain order and protect the dignity of individuals on the one hand, and the state's obligation not to silence legitimate expressions on the other. This article examines the legal position of freedom of opinion in Indonesia, the validity of its restrictions in the digital environment, and the direction of reform after the amendment of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) in 2024 and the latest Constitutional Court ruling. Using normative juridical methods through legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes how positive legal norms are applied in practice and how arrangements in other countries can be referenced. The results of the study show that multi-interpreted articles have the potential to cause excessive criminalization and a chilling effect on freedom of expression. Therefore, this article emphasizes the need to shift from a multi-interpretive and punitive model to a governance based on rights, proportionality, and transparency, so that the protection of freedom of opinion can run in balance with the protection of the rights of other citizens in the digital era.