Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

1.152

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Pendidikan Multikultural Jurnal Konstitusi

Mirin Primudyastutie

FH Universitas Islam Malang

Author-ID : 625789

Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

Interpretasi Hukum oleh Hakim Konstitusi dalam Mendekonstruksi Anatomi Korupsi Migas Sulistyono, Anang; Wahid, Abdul; Primudyastutie, Mirin
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Penafsiran hukum merupakan salah satu cara yang dilakukan dapat oleh hakim saat menangani atau menyelesaikan problem yuridis yang dihadapkan atau dimohonkan kepadanya. Hakim konstitusi sudah seringkali melakukan penafsiran hukum terhadap permohonan uji materiil Undang-undang yang dinilai oleh pemohon bertentangan dengan Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia. Penafsiran yang dilakukan hakim konstitusi ini membuat konstitusi menjadi lebih bermakna. Kebermaknaan (kemanfaatan) konstitusi ini dapat terbaca dalam putusannya terkait judicial review terhadap Undang-undang Migas. Dalam putusan hakim konstitusi ini, interpretasi yang digunakannya mampu memberikan tekanan kepada negara supaya serius menunjukkan keseriusannya dalam mebongkar praktik-praktik mafia migas. Negara memang akhirnya menunjukkan iktikad baiknya dengan membangun tata kelola migas yang baik, namun seiring dengan itu, terbukti bahwa interpretasi hakim konstitusi terbukti, bahwa salah satu kejahatan serius di Indonesia adalah korupsi migas.

Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Anang Sulistyono; Abdul Wahid; Mirin Primudyastutie
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

In the implementation of constitutional review by the Constitutional Court, one of the dynamics occur is the emergence of conditionally constitutional unconstitutional decisions. Furthermore, the utilization of these types of decisions also has its dynamics, especially concerning the interpretation of conditional decisions. It can be indicated by the existence of anomalies decisions, which in the legal consideration, states that the norms reviewed are conditionally constitutional, but in its verdict, the norms are declared conditionally unconstitutional. Therefore, this paper aimed to comprehend the utilization of conditional decisions in constitutional review and to understand how is the anomaly in conditional clause implementation, as well as what Constitutional Court can do to prevent the anomalies to occur. Based on the analysis of conditional decision’s anomalies, there are at least three points that need to be pointed out. First, the anomalies increasingly show that conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional are substantially the same. Second, the use of conditionally constitutional clause as a ratio decidendi is considered to have no impact on the implementation of decisions. Third, the seven decisions analyzed further emphasized the Constitutional Court views that conditionally constitutional clause is deemed to be more effective in the implementation.

Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abdul Wahid Anang Sulistyono Bambang Satriya Dwi Ari Kurniawati Shohib Muslim Siti Marwiyah Yaqub Cikusin

Title Search

Found 2 Documents Search Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi