Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Korporasi di Bidang Lingkungan Hidup: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batam Nomor 932/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm Dekky Tiara Pra Setia; Markoni Markoni; Wasis Susetio; I Made Kanthika
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): July : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i4.329

Abstract

Environmental damage in Indonesia is getting worse day by day. This condition has directly threatened human life. Environmental law enforcement is an action and/or process of coercion to comply with the law which is based on the provisions of statutory regulations. The aim of this research is to analyze efforts to resolve cases against corporations that damage the environment in Indonesia. Case Study Batam District Court Decision Number 932/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm. The method used in this research is normative juridical, namely library legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of his research are that law enforcement against corporations that damage the environment can be subject to criminal sanctions, administrative sanctions, and civil lawsuits can also be filed by the government. This is regulated in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. The criminal sanctions received by PT. Kayla Alam Sentosa, who has intentionally committed an act that results in exceeding the Standard Criteria for Environmental Damage, is subject to a fine of Rp. 6,000,000,000,- (six billion rupiah). The conclusion is that criminal liability for corporations as perpetrators of environmental crimes is also subject to criminal penalties, apart from criminal penalties, they can also be subject to administrative sanctions, namely in the form of revocation of business permits. If it is deemed that the impact of environmental damage is greater than the criminal fine imposed, the corporation can also be sued civilly.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANGGOTA KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM SEJAHTERA BERSAMA ATAS HOMOLOGASI YANG TIDAK OPTIMAL Niken Raras Kusumastuti; I Made kanthika
Jurnal Cinta Nusantara (JCN) Vol. 2 No. 04 (2024): JURNAL CINTA NUSANTARA
Publisher : CV. Bunda Ratu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63754/jcn.v2i04.58

Abstract

Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sejahtera Bersama (KSP-SB) as one of the savings and loan cooperatives established since 2004 and has developed in several provinces in Java with 97 service offices, a total of around 181,000 members and is one of the best and largest savings and loan cooperatives in Indonesia. Since early 2020, KSP-SB there has been a failure to pay profit sharing to members which resulted in KSP-SB being in PKPU. PKPU has ended with a peace agreement through a homologation decision, but KSP-SB did not implement the peace agreement. The problem raised in this study is what form of legal protection is provided to KSP-SB members after the homologation decision. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials are sourced from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which are analyzed based on the theory of legal protection. The results of the study show that the form of legal protection that can be provided to KSP-SB members is repressive legal protection which aims to restore the losses experienced by KSP-SB members. The conclusion of this study is that the management of KSP-SB must be responsible for making payments to members in accordance with the peace agreement in the homologation decision, so that legal protection and legal certainty are achieved for the members of KSP-SB.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA PENERIMAAN MAHASISWA BARU ANTARA INSTANSI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI X DENGAN KONSULTAN PENDIDIKAN Y Ayu Purwaningsih; I Made Kanthika
Jurnal Cinta Nusantara (JCN) Vol. 2 No. 04 (2024): JURNAL CINTA NUSANTARA
Publisher : CV. Bunda Ratu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63754/jcn.v2i04.59

Abstract

Peningkatan mahasiswa baru di Instansi Pendidikan Tinggi X dapat dilakukan melalui kerjasama dengan Konsultan Pendidikan Y. Namun terjadi sengketa, karena Konsultan Pendidikan Y tidak mencapai target penerimaan mahasiswa. Selain itu, terdapat dualisme akun e-campus dan ketidaksingkronan dalam perjanjian kerjasama. Dengan permasalahan, kepastian hukum perjanjian kerjasama penerimaan mahasiswa baru antara Instansi Pendidikan Tinggi X dan Konsultan Pendidikan Y, serta penyelesaian sengketa kerjasama penerimaan mahasiswa baru antara kedua pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian kerjasama tersebut berkepastian hukum karena memenuhi syarat sahnya perjanjian, meskipun tidak terdapat batasan yang jelas mengenai jangka waktu dan pelaksanaan perkuliahan dalam perjanjian kerjasama. Perjanjian kerjasama tersebut tidak bersifat antisipatif terhadap kemungkinan sengketa para pihak. Oleh karenanya sengketa perjanjian kerjasama penerimaan mahasiswa baru diselesaikan melalui negosiasi, yang menghasilkan keputusan untuk mengakhiri kerjasama penerimaan mahasiswa. Namun, ketentuan sharing pendapatan 30% dan 70% tetap berlaku hingga mahasiswa yang terdaftar lulus. Karena jika terjadinya sengketa semakin lama berkemungkinan merugikan mahasiswa. Kesimpulannya yaitu penyelesaian sengketa dilaksanakan dengan cara damai, dengan menerapkan win win solution agar tidak semakin merugikan para pihak. Dalam melakukan perjanjian kerjasama sebaiknya memperhatikan tahapan pra kontrak serta mengedepankan itikad baik.