Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas 10 ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar pada Materi Perpangkatan Anisah Anisah; Suhartati Suhartati; Bintang Zaura
Jurnal Peluang Vol 11, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 11, NOMOR 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jp.v11i1.31558

Abstract

Conceptual understanding is a fundamental skill that students must acquire, making it a key objective in mathematics education. However, there is room for improvement in students' comprehension of mathematical concepts in schools. One psychological aspect that can enhance students' success in learning mathematics is their learning independence. This study explores the relationship between students' understanding of mathematical concepts and their level of learning independence, specifically in the topic of powers. The research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive design, involving 30 10th-grade students as participants. Data was collected through independent learning questionnaires, tests assessing understanding of mathematical concepts, and interviews. The study's findings reveal that students' understanding of mathematical concepts varies according to their level of learning independence. Students with high learning independence demonstrate a firm grasp of concepts, falling within the high category and fulfilling all six indicators of understanding mathematical concepts. Those with a moderate level of independence display a solid understanding, falling within the medium category and fulfilling five indicators. In contrast, students with low learning independence exhibit a limited understanding, falling within the low category and fulfilling only one indicator of understanding mathematical concepts.
The force of questioning and pragmatic strategies in courtroom interrogation: A conversation analysis Anisah Anisah; Diana Fauzia Sari
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 11, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v11i2.35587

Abstract

This is a conversation analysis study on courtroom communication. This study aims to investigate how the forces of question (information seeking and confirmation seeking) were achieved and the pragmatic strategies, particularly repetition, and reformulation, used by the prosecutor during a cross-examination of the defendant in an Indonesian murder case; a courtroom trial of a cyanide poisoning case considered weak due to a lack of sufficient evidence against the defendant. The data was obtained from the Kompas TV YouTube Channel and was transcribed using Jeffersons (2004) technique of transcription. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method to discover the force of questions and pragmatic strategies. The data was analyzed by adapting Gibbons (2003) and Archer's (2005) classification of question form and question force. The results demonstrate both information-seeking and confirmation-seeking questions were used by the prosecutor. Gibbons (2003) repetition and reformulation strategies were used to further investigate the pragmatic strategies. The finding shows pragmatic strategies, particularly repetition, and reformulation, were also evidenced in the lines of questioning. The patterns of the findings indicate that the prosecutor attempted to portray the defendants unreliability and untrustworthiness in court. These findings also implicate that the existence of the strict rules of courtroom communication and power imbalance in court allows the prosecutor to influence the defendants response.