Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Poligami Indonesia dan Maladewa: Sebuah Perbandingan atas Keberanjakan Hukum Keluarga Islam suci ramadhani putri; Deva Yulinda; Weis Arqurnain
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 7 No 1 (2023): January 2023
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.196

Abstract

This article aims to provide an overview of Indonesia and the Maldives as well as the development of Islamic family law in each country, then compare the provisions of polygamy in both countries, both the similarities and the differences. This is followed by analyzing the changes in polygamy provisions that have occurred in the two countries. This article is qualitative research that uses library research. The primary data source for this research is the laws and regulations in both countries that regulate polygamy. The secondary data source is any literature that is relevant to this research. These various data were analyzed using deductive analysis techniques. Legal reforms in the realm of Islamic family law have been carried out by many Muslim countries in the world, including Indonesia and the Maldives. Even though Indonesia and the Maldives share the majority of the Syafiʽi sect, both of them have various differences as well as various similarities regarding the provisions of polygamy. These differences are inseparable from various factors, such as history and geographical location; legal system; social, economic, and cultural; gender relations; and development of family law. This article argues that the Islamic family law reform method for the topic of polygamy in Indonesia tends to apply both intra-doctrinal reform and extra-doctrinal reform. The Maldives tend to only apply the extra-doctrinal reform.
Memilih Setia: Studi Terhadap Keluarga Tanpa Anak di Desa Menggala, Pemenang, Lombok Utara Suci Ramadhani Putri; Deva Yulinda; Weis Arqurnain
The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law Vol 6 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51675/jaksya.v6i1.990

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui motivasi pasangan suami istri tanpa anak di Desa Menggala, Pemenang, Lombok Utara, Nusa Tenggara Barat; tetap setia, respon masyarakat di Desa Menggala terhadap pasangan tersebut, dan menganalisisnya menggunakan teori Tindakan Sosial oleh Max Weber dan teori Stigma oleh Erving Goffman. Dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, sudah sepatutnya untuk hidup dengan saling menghargai. Terhadap pasangan suami istri yang memilih setia (tidak bercerai atau berpoligami) pada pasangannya, meskipun belum dikaruniai anak, maka patut diapresiasi motivasi yang dimiliki. Sebaliknya, tidak seharusnya kita justru memberikan stigma negatif. Motivasi pasangan suami istri tanpa anak untuk tetap setia di Desa Menggala didukung oleh empat faktor, yaitu; agama, pendidikan, keluarga, dan psikologi. Respon masyarakat terhadap pasangan tersebut, ada yang bersikap biasa saja dan ada juga yang memberikan stigma negatif. Menggunakan Teori Tindakan Sosial oleh Max Weber, maka yang dilakukan pasangan suami istri di Desa Menggala termasuk ke dalam tiga kategori tindakan sosial, yaitu; rasionalitas yang berorientasi nilai (werk rational), tindakan afektif/tindakan yang dipengaruhi emosi (affectual action), dan tindakan tradisional/tindakan karena kebiasaan (traditional action). Dan menggunakan Teori Stigma oleh Erving Goffman, maka respon masyarakat terhadap pasangan tersebut masuk ke dalam stigma jenis abominations of the body atau stigma terhadap fisik.
The Legal Framework and Governance Challenges of Sovereign Wealth Funds in Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Danantara and the Indonesia Investment Authority Deva Nabilah; Benny Sultan; Deva Yulinda; Muhammad Izzi
ELQONUN: HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN ISLAM Vol 3 No 2 (2025): ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/elqonun.v3i2.32041

Abstract

Indonesia is undergoing a major transformation in its sovereign investment management through the establishment of two key entities: the Indonesia Investment Authority (INA) and Danantara. While both were established with the aim of strengthening long-term economic performance and increasing public and international investment, various challenges related to good governance have emerged—such as political interference, lack of transparency, potential conflicts of interest, and weak legal oversight. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the institutional structures and legal frameworks of INA and Danantara, and to evaluate the extent to which their practices adopt the principles of good governance (including accountability, transparency, effectiveness, the rule of law, and public participation). The research method is a normative qualitative approach with juridical-documentary studies and interviews with relevant stakeholders, as well as comparative analysis between institutions. The research results are expected to identify gaps between regulations and field practices, highlight key risks in the management of sovereign wealth funds in Indonesia, and provide policy recommendations to strengthen accountability and oversight mechanisms, increase transparency, and strengthen the independence of sovereign investment institutions. This research contributes to the literature on SWF governance and state administration and provides a policy foundation for sustainable institutional improvement.