Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Poligami Indonesia dan Maladewa: Sebuah Perbandingan atas Keberanjakan Hukum Keluarga Islam suci ramadhani putri; Deva Yulinda; Weis Arqurnain
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 7 No 1 (2023): January 2023
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.196

Abstract

This article aims to provide an overview of Indonesia and the Maldives as well as the development of Islamic family law in each country, then compare the provisions of polygamy in both countries, both the similarities and the differences. This is followed by analyzing the changes in polygamy provisions that have occurred in the two countries. This article is qualitative research that uses library research. The primary data source for this research is the laws and regulations in both countries that regulate polygamy. The secondary data source is any literature that is relevant to this research. These various data were analyzed using deductive analysis techniques. Legal reforms in the realm of Islamic family law have been carried out by many Muslim countries in the world, including Indonesia and the Maldives. Even though Indonesia and the Maldives share the majority of the Syafiʽi sect, both of them have various differences as well as various similarities regarding the provisions of polygamy. These differences are inseparable from various factors, such as history and geographical location; legal system; social, economic, and cultural; gender relations; and development of family law. This article argues that the Islamic family law reform method for the topic of polygamy in Indonesia tends to apply both intra-doctrinal reform and extra-doctrinal reform. The Maldives tend to only apply the extra-doctrinal reform.
Poligami Indonesia dan Maladewa: Sebuah Perbandingan atas Keberanjakan Hukum Keluarga Islam putri, suci ramadhani; Yulinda, Deva; Arqurnain, Weis
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 7 No 1 (2023): January 2023
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.196

Abstract

This article aims to provide an overview of Indonesia and the Maldives as well as the development of Islamic family law in each country, then compare the provisions of polygamy in both countries, both the similarities and the differences. This is followed by analyzing the changes in polygamy provisions that have occurred in the two countries. This article is qualitative research that uses library research. The primary data source for this research is the laws and regulations in both countries that regulate polygamy. The secondary data source is any literature that is relevant to this research. These various data were analyzed using deductive analysis techniques. Legal reforms in the realm of Islamic family law have been carried out by many Muslim countries in the world, including Indonesia and the Maldives. Even though Indonesia and the Maldives share the majority of the Syafiʽi sect, both of them have various differences as well as various similarities regarding the provisions of polygamy. These differences are inseparable from various factors, such as history and geographical location; legal system; social, economic, and cultural; gender relations; and development of family law. This article argues that the Islamic family law reform method for the topic of polygamy in Indonesia tends to apply both intra-doctrinal reform and extra-doctrinal reform. The Maldives tend to only apply the extra-doctrinal reform.
Injustice Legal System Ibuism in Indonesian Marriage Law: A Study on Polygamy for Childlessness Reasons Yulinda, Deva; Putri, Suci Ramadhani; Elmhemıt, Hüseyin
Al-Manhaj: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-manhaj.v7i1.19515

Abstract

This research examines the inequality of justice for women in the regulation of polygamy in Indonesia, especially Article 4 paragraph (2) letter c of the Marriage Law and Article 57 letter c of the Compilation of Islamic Law which allows husbands to practice polygamy if the wife cannot produce offspring. This research uses a qualitative approach with a normative legal analysis method. The primary data sources of this research are the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The secondary data sources are Court decisions, academic literature, journals, and expert opinions relevant to this research. The data analysis technique in this research uses the content analysis method. This research argues that there has been an inequality "Legal System Ibuism" in the polygamy permit policy of childlessness families in Indonesia. This research recommends legal reform in three aspects: legal structure (elimination of discriminatory policies by the executive, legislative and judiciary), legal substance (revision of polygamy rules in Article 4 paragraph 2 letter c of the Marriage Law and Article 57 letter c of the Compilation of Islamic Law), and legal culture (changing society's views on the role of women in marriage). As a solution, alternatives such as adoption, foster parents, and reproductive technology can be prioritised over polygamy. With these reforms, the legal system can be more just and inclusive for women.
Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Dispensasi Nikah Anak Dibawah Umur di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Mataram Yulinda, Deva; Lalu Supriadi Bin Mujib; Baiq Ratnah Mulhimmah
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v12i2.173

Abstract

Pertimbangan hakim dalam dispensasi nikah anak di bawah umur di Pengadilan Agama kelas 1A Mataram dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui disparatis putusan permohonan dispensasi pernikahan dapat membantu menekan angka pernikahan dini dengan pendekatan hukum tanpa bersinggungan dengan aturan dan norma lainnya yang berlaku dimasyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apa saja pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan permohonan dispensasi nikah anak di bawah umur dan untuk menganalisis perspektif mashlahat terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus permohonan dispensasi di pengadilan Agama kelas 1A Mataram. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitan ini adalah metode empiris dengan mengkaji praktik dispensasi sebagai sebuah praktik hukum dari diberlakukannya sebuah ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologis hukum dengan pengumupulan informasi menggunakan Teknik wawancara mendalam. Berdasarkan informasi yang peneliti peroleh dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa hakim Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Mataram dalam memutuskan permohonan dispensasi nikah bagi anak di bawah umur didasarkan pada pertimbangan filosofis, sosiologis dan yuridis, dispensasi nikah yang diputus oleh Hakim Pengadilan Agama kelas 1A Mataram dari sisi Mashlahat mengandung makna dan nilai di dalamnya. Keyakinan hakim berdasarkan berbagai pertimbangan sesuai dengan fakta dan keterangan dalam persidangan tentu menghadirkan sebuah kesimpulan yang komprehensif dalam memutuskan suatu permohonan.
Memilih Setia: Studi Terhadap Keluarga Tanpa Anak di Desa Menggala, Pemenang, Lombok Utara Suci Ramadhani Putri; Deva Yulinda; Weis Arqurnain
The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law Vol 6 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51675/jaksya.v6i1.990

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui motivasi pasangan suami istri tanpa anak di Desa Menggala, Pemenang, Lombok Utara, Nusa Tenggara Barat; tetap setia, respon masyarakat di Desa Menggala terhadap pasangan tersebut, dan menganalisisnya menggunakan teori Tindakan Sosial oleh Max Weber dan teori Stigma oleh Erving Goffman. Dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, sudah sepatutnya untuk hidup dengan saling menghargai. Terhadap pasangan suami istri yang memilih setia (tidak bercerai atau berpoligami) pada pasangannya, meskipun belum dikaruniai anak, maka patut diapresiasi motivasi yang dimiliki. Sebaliknya, tidak seharusnya kita justru memberikan stigma negatif. Motivasi pasangan suami istri tanpa anak untuk tetap setia di Desa Menggala didukung oleh empat faktor, yaitu; agama, pendidikan, keluarga, dan psikologi. Respon masyarakat terhadap pasangan tersebut, ada yang bersikap biasa saja dan ada juga yang memberikan stigma negatif. Menggunakan Teori Tindakan Sosial oleh Max Weber, maka yang dilakukan pasangan suami istri di Desa Menggala termasuk ke dalam tiga kategori tindakan sosial, yaitu; rasionalitas yang berorientasi nilai (werk rational), tindakan afektif/tindakan yang dipengaruhi emosi (affectual action), dan tindakan tradisional/tindakan karena kebiasaan (traditional action). Dan menggunakan Teori Stigma oleh Erving Goffman, maka respon masyarakat terhadap pasangan tersebut masuk ke dalam stigma jenis abominations of the body atau stigma terhadap fisik.
The Legal Framework and Governance Challenges of Sovereign Wealth Funds in Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Danantara and the Indonesia Investment Authority Deva Nabilah; Benny Sultan; Deva Yulinda; Muhammad Izzi
ELQONUN: HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN ISLAM Vol 3 No 2 (2025): ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/elqonun.v3i2.32041

Abstract

Indonesia is undergoing a major transformation in its sovereign investment management through the establishment of two key entities: the Indonesia Investment Authority (INA) and Danantara. While both were established with the aim of strengthening long-term economic performance and increasing public and international investment, various challenges related to good governance have emerged—such as political interference, lack of transparency, potential conflicts of interest, and weak legal oversight. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the institutional structures and legal frameworks of INA and Danantara, and to evaluate the extent to which their practices adopt the principles of good governance (including accountability, transparency, effectiveness, the rule of law, and public participation). The research method is a normative qualitative approach with juridical-documentary studies and interviews with relevant stakeholders, as well as comparative analysis between institutions. The research results are expected to identify gaps between regulations and field practices, highlight key risks in the management of sovereign wealth funds in Indonesia, and provide policy recommendations to strengthen accountability and oversight mechanisms, increase transparency, and strengthen the independence of sovereign investment institutions. This research contributes to the literature on SWF governance and state administration and provides a policy foundation for sustainable institutional improvement.
Chain Model Based On Maqasid Syariah And Sdgs: Digital Economic Empowerment Strategy For Women Victims Of Child Marriage In Lombok Benny Sultan; Deva Nabilah; Khadijatul Musanna; Deva Yulinda
Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Vol 12, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/yurisprudentia.v12i1.19891

Abstract

Child marriage in Lombok is still a serious problem that strengthens the structural marginalization of women through school dropouts, economic dependence, and low access to the digital economy. Various empowerment programs have been implemented, but there is no model that integrates the values of Maqasid Sharia, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and a comprehensive digital economy empowerment strategy. This research aims to construct and validate the Chain Model based on Maqasid Syariah and SDGs as a digital economy empowerment strategy for women victims of child marriage in Lombok. The research uses a qualitative approach with an instrumental case study method. The data was obtained through in-depth interviews with 24 informants consisting of women victims of child marriage, religious leaders, program facilitators, and policy makers, and strengthened through focus group discussions and document analysis. The analysis was carried out using thematic analysis with a gender perspective. The results of the study show that women victims of child marriage face economic vulnerability, low digital financial literacy, and high risk of digital economy exploitation. The Chain Model developed integrates the five principles of Maqasid Syariah with the target of SDGs 1, 4, 5, and 8 through seven systematic intervention chains. This model has been proven to strengthen digital financial literacy, increase economic confidence, and expand women's participation in digital platform-based micro-enterprises. These findings offer a contextual, sustainable, and relevant empowerment model as a basis for strengthening policies for women victims of child marriage.
Memilih Setia: Studi Terhadap Keluarga Tanpa Anak di Desa Menggala, Pemenang, Lombok Utara Suci Ramadhani Putri; Deva Yulinda; Weis Arqurnain
The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law Vol 6 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51675/jaksya.v6i1.990

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui motivasi pasangan suami istri tanpa anak di Desa Menggala, Pemenang, Lombok Utara, Nusa Tenggara Barat; tetap setia, respon masyarakat di Desa Menggala terhadap pasangan tersebut, dan menganalisisnya menggunakan teori Tindakan Sosial oleh Max Weber dan teori Stigma oleh Erving Goffman. Dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, sudah sepatutnya untuk hidup dengan saling menghargai. Terhadap pasangan suami istri yang memilih setia (tidak bercerai atau berpoligami) pada pasangannya, meskipun belum dikaruniai anak, maka patut diapresiasi motivasi yang dimiliki. Sebaliknya, tidak seharusnya kita justru memberikan stigma negatif. Motivasi pasangan suami istri tanpa anak untuk tetap setia di Desa Menggala didukung oleh empat faktor, yaitu; agama, pendidikan, keluarga, dan psikologi. Respon masyarakat terhadap pasangan tersebut, ada yang bersikap biasa saja dan ada juga yang memberikan stigma negatif. Menggunakan Teori Tindakan Sosial oleh Max Weber, maka yang dilakukan pasangan suami istri di Desa Menggala termasuk ke dalam tiga kategori tindakan sosial, yaitu; rasionalitas yang berorientasi nilai (werk rational), tindakan afektif/tindakan yang dipengaruhi emosi (affectual action), dan tindakan tradisional/tindakan karena kebiasaan (traditional action). Dan menggunakan Teori Stigma oleh Erving Goffman, maka respon masyarakat terhadap pasangan tersebut masuk ke dalam stigma jenis abominations of the body atau stigma terhadap fisik.