Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Policy & Governance Review Telaah Bisnis
Idham Ibty
Department Of Public Administration, Faculty Of Social And Political Sciences, Universitas Proklamasi 45 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penggunaan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Program Kerja Dompet Dhuafa Yogyakarta Djoko Wijono; Idham Ibty
Telaah Bisnis Vol 16, No 1 (2015): Juli 2015
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (372.729 KB) | DOI: 10.35917/tb.v16i1.31

Abstract

Abstract Manager always faced to make a choice from various alternatives. Here the necessary prioritization and test the consistency of the choices that have been made. In complex situations, decision-making is not influenced by one factor alone but is multifactorial and includes various levels and interests. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, based on mathematics and psychology. It was developed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s and has been extensively studied and refined since then. The AHP helps decision makers find one that best suits their goal and their understanding of the problem. It provides a comprehensive and rational framework for structuring a decision problem, for representing and quantifying its elements, for relating those elements to overall goals, and for evaluating alternative solutions. In this study, AHP used for decission making in Dhompet Dhuafa planning programs. First we decompose their decision problem into a hierarchy of more easily comprehended sub-problems, The elements of the hierarchy can relate to any aspect of the decision problem. The AHP converts these evaluations to numerical values that can be processed and compared over the entire range of the problem. This study use metodhologies: brain storming discuss, indepth interview, and collect secondary data. Find Dhompet Dhuafa solution problems by AHP.The good point of this study is showed how to use AHP for decision making.
Analysis of the Implementation of Risk-Mitigation Governance in Public Services Near Yogyakarta International Airport Idham Ibty; Subando Agus Margono; Erwan Agus Purwanto
Policy & Governance Review Vol 7 No 2 (2023): May
Publisher : Indonesian Association for Public Administration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30589/pgr.v7i2.660

Abstract

The public service risk mitigation implemented by local governments in Indonesia in tackling potential risks and the impact of development on local areas is important for governance reform. This study aims to analyze the public service risk mitigation carried out by the Government of Kulon Progo Regency in the YIA area. This study is a type of qualitative research with an instrumental case study methodology. Data were collected by analyzing secondary data, as well as primary data through interviews and observations. The analysis was carried out using triangulation techniques, policy adoption, comparison, searching for data explanations and inductive reasoning, and FGDs. The study findings show that risk-mitigation governance can shape public service providers to face potential risks due to reducing negative impacts on citizens’ basic rights and inequalities in the community. The risk-mitigation governance implementation runs led by the commitment of risk-oriented-local leaders, harmonization of regulations has not integrated to local-sector- law, stakeholder involvement with engagement the participation of basic service users, the private sector, as well as university, community representatives, media, and NGOs, with a collaborative and adaptable approach. Compliance and synergy among stakeholders are the most important factors forming public service risk mitigation.
Co-Authors Djoko Wijono Erwan Agus Purwanto Subando Agus Margono