Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Persepsi Nelayan Terhadap Kegiatan Penyuluhan Perikanan Desa Muara Muntai Ulu Kecamatan Muara Muntai Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara: Persepsi Nelayan Terhadap Kegiatan Penyuluhan Muhammad Rizky; Eko Sugiharto; Gusti Haqiqiansyah
Jurnal Pembangunan Perikanan dan Agribisnis Vol 10 No 2 (2023): edisi online
Publisher : 2339-1324

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Extension activities in an effort to develop fishing are held to improve the performance of fishermen in Muara Muntai Ulu Village. With the extension, it can help fishermen in increasing productivity, business efficiency, business income, improving the quality of life as well as increasing awareness in preserving environmental functions. Fisheries extension activities cause various perceptions from various fishermen in Muara Muntai Ulu. This study aims to determine the level of perception of fishermen on fishery extension activities in Muara Muntai Ulu Village, Muara Muntai District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency. This study uses the Total Sampling method. Data analysis used descriptive qualitative Likert scale. According to the results of the Likert scale analysis of all indicators, the average Fisheries Extension activity is in the medium category. In the Fishermen's Perception research on Extension activities partially, all indicators are in the medium and high categories. Indicators that get a moderate score are facilitating the learning process of key players and business actors, Ensuring easy access of fishermen to sources of information, technology, and other resources, assisting fishermen in developing their capabilities so that they are highly competitive, productive, good sustainable business governance and Help analyze and solve fishermen's problems. While the indicators that get high scores are improving leadership, managerial and entrepreneurial abilities.
Perlindungan Hukum dan Kepastian Hukum terhadap Perdagangan Data Pribadi dalam UU PDP Muhammad Rizky; Rini Apriyani; Nur Aripkah
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v3i1.1488

Abstract

Article 20 of the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) normatively regulates the protection of data subjects and constitutes a pivotal provision that underscores the principle of consent as the legal basis for the processing of personal data for commercial purposes. This normative framework safeguards individuals’ right to privacy, encompassing the validity of explicit consent, the right to withdraw such consent, and the accountability of data controllers. In parallel, Articles 65 to 70 of the PDP Law substantively establish various categories of criminal offenses within the context of personal data protection. These include the unlawful acquisition, disclosure, processing, falsification, and utilization of personal data. Collectively, these provisions reflect the State’s commitment to ensuring criminal legal protection against violations of personal data.This research adopts a doctrinal legal methodology with a descriptive-normative approach to address two primary issues: First, to examine and identify the scope of legal protection concerning the trade of personal data under the PDP Law; and Second, to assess and determine the degree of legal certainty afforded to the trade of personal data within the framework of the PDP Law.Notwithstanding the protective intent embodied in Article 20—particularly concerning the commercial use of personal data—this provision gives rise to legal uncertainty due to the absence of comprehensive regulatory clarity on several critical aspects. Similarly, Articles 65 to 70 continue to exhibit significant legal ambiguities, particularly with respect to the constituent elements of offenses, the definition of harm, corporate liability, regulatory overlap with other legislative instruments, and the lack of clear enforcement mechanisms and implementing institutions.