Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis
Muhammad Saiful Mujab, Muhammad Saiful
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ABDURRAHMAN WAHID’S CONCEPT OF NON-VIOLENT APPROACH TO BUILDING PEACE Mujab, Muhammad Saiful
Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora - UIN Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/tos.v4i2.1712

Abstract

Abdurrahman Wahid is a prominent moslem scholar in Indonesia and Indonesia’s fourth president (and the first president voted by people’s representative council). He was born from traditionalist muslim family. His grand father is Hasyim Asy’ary, the founder of Nahdlatul Ulama’, the biggest islamic organization in theworld with 25 million member. His father, Wahid Hasyim, is the first minister of religious affairs. He was also the chairman of Nahdlatul Ulama’ for several periods.His contribution to create peace is countless. He is well known as the father of pluralism in Indonesia. After his death, many people started to fund organizations learning about his thoughts of pluralism, culture and religion, protecting minorities, respecting diversities, creating peace, etc.This article is attempting to explain his non-violance approach to create peace, in the case of terrorism prefention. Firstly, the writer define the term terrorism in general and Abdurrahman Wahid’s version. Secondly, it is explained three backgrounds of the emergence of terrorism; (1). the feeling of inferiority (2). Superficial understanding towards religion (3) the weak system of Indonesia government. And the third is the solution of those three causes; (1). Dialogue (2). Islamic Education (3). Improving the system of the government.
THE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND RELIGIOUS HOSPITALITY IN OPEN DAG PPME AL IKHLASH AMSTERDAM Mujab, Muhammad Saiful
Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora - UIN Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/tos.v8i1.4495

Abstract

This article describes and analyses the Open dag event held by PPME Al Ikhlas Amsterdam. It is an annual event and a form of religious hospitality in which the members of PPME Al Ikhlas Amsterdam warmly welcome the guests or strangers. This study uses a perspective of hospitality from either scriptural or theoretical basis. In terms of scripture, religious hospitality is highly commended by Islamic and Christian scriptures. While in terms of theoretical perspective, there are many scholars who discussed the theme based on various approaches; theology, sociology, ethics. I found that Open Dag allows people from various backgrounds to meet in person and to become aquianted with the existence of PPME Al Ikhlas Amsterdam. The civic engagement which is gained through religious hospitality practiced by PPME Al Ikhlas Amsterdam leads to peace building among communities
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AL-JAM’U METHOD ON MUKHTALIF AL-HADITS AND ITS LEGAL ISTIDLAL: Hadith Study on the Limits of Male Awrah Saerozi, Ahmad; Mujab, Muhammad Saiful; Hanafi, Abdullah
RIWAYAH Vol 10, No 1 (2024): Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis
Publisher : ilmu hadis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/riwayah.v10i1.25657

Abstract

Scholars offer three methods to resolve the mukhtalif al-hadits: al-jam’u (reconciliation), al-naskh (abolishing the ruling of the hadith that first appears), and al-tarjih (favoring one of the traditions). Among the examples of traditions that fall under the category of mukhtalif are the traditions about the limits of the awrah of men. The researcher in this article will discuss the implementation of the al-jam’u method on the hadith about the limits of male genitalia. This research is a type of qualitative research with a library research model through a philosophical approach, and data processing techniques using descriptive-analytical methods and then analyzed using content analysis techniques.  The results of this study are that there are two hadiths about the limits of male awrah that are outwardly contradictory. The first hadith comes from Jarhad who says that the male thigh is awrah. While the second tradition which comes from Anas bin Malik says that the Prophet’s thigh is not awrah. The implementation of the al-jam’u (reconciliation) method related to this issue is that although in terms of sanad quality the first tradition is stronger which says, the madzahib arba’ah agree that the thigh is a male awrah which should not be shown to others. Only Dawud Zhahiri and Ustukhri say that the thigh is not awrah. The madzahib arba’ah’s interpretation of the hadith about the opening of the Prophet’s thighs explains his inadvertence because his clothes were uncovered and in a critical situation. In addition, after his thighs were exposed, he immediately covered them.[Untuk menyelesaikan mukhtalif al-hadis, para ulama menawarkan tiga metode, yaitu: al-jam’ (rekonsiliasi), al-naskh (menghapus hukum hadis yang pertama kali muncul), dan al-tarjih (mengunggulkan salah satu hadis). Di antara contoh hadis yang termasuk kategori mukhtalif adalah hadis seputar batasan aurat laki-laki. Artikel ini akan mengulas seputar implementasi metode al-jam’u terhadap hadis seputar batasan aurat laki-laki dan istidlal hukumnya. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan model kepustakaan (library research) melalui pendekatan filosofis, serta teknik pengolahan data menggunakan metode deskriptif-analitik kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis isi (content analysis).  Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu terdapat dua hadis tentang batasan aurat laki-laki yang secara lahiriahnya bertentangan. Hadis pertama bersumber dari Jarhad yang mengatakan paha laki-laki adalah aurat. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan perintah Nabi kepada Jarhad untuk menutup pahanya. Sementara hadis kedua yang bersumber dari Anas bin Malik mengatakan paha Nabi bukanlah aurat. Hal ini berdasarkan pada hadis yang menjelaskan bahwa paha nabi terlihat saat menuju ke perang Khaibar. Implementasi dari metode al-jam’u (rekonsiliasi) terkait masalah ini yaitu meskipun dari segi kualitas sanad lebih kuat hadis pertama, tapi madzahib arba’ah sepakat mengatakan paha merupakan aurat laki-laki yang tidak boleh diperlihatkan kepada orang lain. Hanya Dawud Zhahiri dan Ustukhri yang mengatakan paha bukan aurat. Keduanya mengatakan aurat laki-laki hanya kemaluan depan dan belakang.  Istidlal madzahib arba’ah dari hadis tentang terbukanya paha Nabi menjelaskan ketidaksengajaan beliau karena pakaiannya tersingkap dan dalam keadaan genting (perjalanan perang Khaibar). Di samping itu setelah pahanya terlihat, beliau langsung menutupnya.]
Co-Authors Hanafi, Abdullah Saerozi, Ahmad