Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Religi�: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Achmad Murtafi Haris, Achmad Murtafi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
a Study on Bisri Mustofa, Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah [Hamka] and Quraish Shihab’s Tafsîr on Isrâ’îlîyât Haris, Achmad Murtafi; Margana, Sri; Al Makin, Al Makin
Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Vol 6 No 2 (2016): September
Publisher : Program Studi Studi Agama-Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.39 KB)

Abstract

Umat Islam sekarang sinis terhadap kisah isrâ’îlîyât atau kisah-kisah yang berasal dari Yahudi dan Kristen. Fenomena intelektual ini bertentangan dengan respons Muslim awal yang akrab dengan materi-materi isrâ’îlîyât. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk membedah kisah-kisah isrâ’îlîyât yang ditulis oleh Bisri, Hamka, dan Quraish dalam tafsir masing-masing: Tafsîr al-Ibrîz, Tafsîr al-Azhar, dan Tafsîr al-Miṣbah. Titik tekan dari artikel ini adalah latar belakang yang kemudian mempengaruhi persepsi mereka dalam menafsir ayat-ayat isrâ’îlîyât. Artikel ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dan pendekatan sejarah intelektual untuk mengetahui perkembangan ide manusia pada isu tertentu. Makalah ini berakhir pada kesimpulan bahwa sikap toleransi Bisri dan Hamka dan penolakan Quraish isrâ’îlîyât dipengaruhi oleh latar belakang sosial dan akademik masing-masing.  
Investigating Cohesiveness of QS. Al-Mā’idah: A Review on Michel Cuypers Implementation of Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq; Aziz, Husein; Haris, Achmad Murtafi
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.2022.2301-03

Abstract

This article examines Michel Cuyper’s interpretation of the Qur’an which is the result of the application of Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) in QS. Al-Mā’idah. Although SRA’s implementation has demonstrated the coherence of the Qur’anic text; however, no one has properly articulated the cohesiveness of the Qur’anic text as the basis of that coherence. Thus, to ascertain the text’s cohesiveness in terms of positions and forms from the SRA’s perspective, this study applied cohesion text theories to Cuypers’ implementation of SRA in QS. Al-Mā’idah. A thesis of the paper is that, according to SRA, the cohesiveness of a qur’anic text in QS Al-Mā’idah can be shown through the pairings of words or sentences inside particular groupings of text particles following the principles of Semitic Rhetoric. The Semitic Rhetoric’s principle of parallel, concentric, or mirror symmetry in those text particle groups determined which words or phrases are paired in a text particle group. As a result, from an SRA perspective, the Qur’anic text’s cohesiveness may be discovered at each level of the text particle group, demonstrating multi-layered cohesiveness. In Cuypers’ reading of QS Al-Mā’idah, synonyms and repetition are used to maintain lexical cohesion, while ellipsis, substitution, and reference established grammatical cohesion.
تولي المرأة لمنصب القضاء في ليبيا : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة في الفقه الإسلامي والقانون الليبي Yousuf, Salih Abdulrahman Alsounusi; Wargadinata, Wildana; Rofiq , Aunur; Haris, Achmad Murtafi
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 28 No 1 (2025): Al-Qanun, Vol. 28, No. 1, Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2025.28.1.53-72

Abstract

This study aims to explore the prevailing view in Libyan society towards women assuming the position of judge, focusing on the opinions and evidence of jurists on this subject, discussing their different points of view, and comparing this with legal legislation in Libya and Islamic jurisprudence. The problem of the research lies in the fact that Libyan society adheres strongly to its traditions and customs, and the problem also arises in the different opinions of jurists on the ruling on women assuming the judiciary in Islam, which prompted the researcher to study the reasons for this difference and divergence in opinions. The researcher relied in his study on a set of research methods: he used the descriptive approach to provide a picture of the issue, and he also used the analytical method to study the data, and used the comparative method to compare different jurisprudential opinions with each other, as well as compare them with legal legislation, in order to reach conclusions about the reasons for the difference. The researcher reached several main conclusions, the most important of which is that the prevailing traditions in Libya reject women taking over the judiciary because of the prevailing culture. In contrast, Libyan law provides that women may hold the judiciary absolutely. In Islamic jurisprudence, jurists have differed in four main directions: the public prohibits women from taking over the judiciary absolutely, while some Shafi'is believe that this is permissible in necessity. As for the Ahnafs, they allow her to judge in matters in which she testifies, while Ibn Jarir al-Tabari and those with him believe that it is permissible for her to assume the judiciary absolutely.  
Co-Authors Al Makin Al Makin, Al Makin Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi Husein Aziz Rofiq , Aunur Sri Margana Wildana Wargadinata Yousuf, Salih Abdulrahman Alsounusi