Dea Ayu Lestari
Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kesiapan Pedagogical Content Knowledge Calon Guru Matematika Mengembangkan Modul Ajar Lydia Lia Prayitno; Ninik Mutianingsih; Dea Ayu Lestari; Annisa Dewi Ainur Rosyidah
SNHRP Vol. 5 (2023): Seminar Nasional Hasil Riset dan Pengabdian (SNHRP) Ke 5 Tahun 2023
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Adi Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kemampuan mengembangkan modul ajar merupakan modal dasar yang harus dimiliki oleh calon guru. Penelitian deskriptif ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kesiapan PCK calon guru dalam mengembangkan modul ajar. Empat calon guru semester 6 program studi Pendidikan Matematika yang memprogram mata kuliah PLP menjadi subjek penelitian. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan metode dokumentasi yaitu melalui modul ajar yang dikembangkan calon guru. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis berdasarkan empat komponen dan hasilnya diperoleh calon guru siap mengembangkan modul ajar jika ditinjau dari pemilihan modul pembelajaran, pemunculan profil pelajar pancasila, dan topik materi. Akan tetapi dari topik materi tersebut, mayoritas calon guru belum memaparkan diferensiasi di modul ajar yang dikembangkan. Untuk itu perlu dilakukan workshop bagi para dosen pengajar PLP agar memiliki bekal dalam mengembangkan modul ajar sehingga dapat memberikan pengetahuannya kepada calon guru.
Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Model PISA ditinjau dari AQ Dea Ayu Lestari; Lydia Lia Prayitno
MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology Vol 8 No 1 (2023): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/must.v8i1.18210

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to describe student’s mathematical literacy abilities in solving PISA model questions seen from the adversity quotient. This research uses a qualitative method while the type of descriptive qualitative. The results showed that subject with the category adversity quotient climber and camper had good mathematics literacy abilities. Based on the work on the test mathematics literacy abilities, two subject climbers and camper comply with five indicators, that is 1)Communication, 2)Mathematizing, 3)Reasoning and argument, 4)Using mathematical tools, 5) Devising a strategy for solving problems. While the subject with the category adversity quotient quitter had passable mathematics literacy abilities. Based on the work on the test mathematics literacy abilities, subject quitter comply with four indicators, that is 1)Mathematizing, 2) Reasoning and argument, 3)Using mathematical tools, 4) Devising a strategy for solving problems. There are two differences found by researchers, that is 1) The subject quitter is underprivileged to comply the indicator communication, while the subject climber and camper can comply with the indicator. 2) In the indicator using symbolic, technical, formal, language, and operation, subject climber and camper are underprivileged to comply this indicator, while the quitter is unable to comply this indicator.
Kesalahan Calon Guru Matematika Dalam Mengembangkan Modul Ajar Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Lydia Lia Prayitno; Ninik Mutianingsih; Dea Ayu Lestari; Annisa Dewi Ainur Rosyidah; Dadang Sumianto
Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath : Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Dr. Soetomo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (722.021 KB) | DOI: 10.25139/smj.v11i1.5694

Abstract

Teachers are educators who are required to have pedagogical, professional, social, and personality competencies. The role of educational institutions prepares prospective teachers to have these competencies. This paper is a descriptive study involving 25 prospective mathematics teachers who program field experience courses in schools. This course requires a prospective teacher to develop mathematics teaching modules for the high school level. So, the purpose of this study describes the mistakes of prospective mathematics teachers in developing mathematics teaching modules. The data is collected through the documentation by collecting mathematics teaching modules developed by the prospective teachers, and then analyzed based on three components, such are general information, core information, and attachments. The results of this study indicate that the mistakes made by prospective teachers in the general information component happen in determining the model, approach, learning method, diagnostic results, time duration, and meetings assigned. Then, the mistakes in core components happen when prospective teachers determine meaningful understanding, triggering questions, designing assessments, not explaining learning syntax, scientific approach, 21st-century skills, Pancasila student profiles, and differentiation. Furthermore, in the attachment component, the mistakes happen in the development of LKPD which is not yet constructivist and can be done individually, has not developed appropriate learning media, has not been appropriate in developing remedial and enrichment programs, and has not written glossarial in mathematics teaching module. Keywords: mistakes, development, teaching module, Merdeka curriculum