Ahmadi Abdul Adzim
Magister of Islamic Education, Islamic University of Madinah

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Premeditated Murder in the Modern Era Comparative Study of Perspectives on Islamic Law and the Criminal Code Tina Oktatianti; Mahmoud Saleh Mubarak Bin Humaid; Rozi Irfan Rosyadi; Ahmadi Abdul Adzim; Muthoifin
Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humani
Publisher : Walidem Institute and Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (786.26 KB) | DOI: 10.61455/sicopus.v1i01.28

Abstract

This study tries to 1) identify the elements that lead murderers to plan their crimes, and 2) understand those elements. The judge's factors to consider when determining murder cases with intent to kill, 3). Comparing the Criminal Code with Islamic law's definition of premeditated murder. To gather data for this study, a library research technique known as a normative juridical approach to literature evaluation was used. The Criminal Code, followed by the Koran, Hadith, and translations into Indonesian, as well as relevant scholarly works, books, and articles, served as the source for legal information. The study's findings led to the conclusion that Indonesian law's Criminal Code Articles 338–350 govern the crime of murder. In the Criminal Code, premeditated murder is defined as a purposeful killing, whereas in Islamic criminal law, the victim's life is the first thing that is intended to be taken. According to Article 340 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrator of a premeditated murder may be sentenced to life in prison by a jury of judges. Whereas in Islamic criminal law, as mentioned in QS. Al-Maidah verse 45 and Hadith, the perpetrator's acts might result in a death sentence (Qishash) for committing purposeful murder.
Sharia Views on Music and Songs: Perspective Study of Muhammadiyah and Madzhab Four Muthoifin; Aisha Bahaaeldin Eprahim Ali; Thufail Al-Mutawakkil; Nazar Fadli; Ahmadi Abdul Adzim
Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia
Publisher : Walidem Institute and Publishing (WIP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (150.835 KB) | DOI: 10.61455/deujis.v1i01.6

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to uncover the law of singing and music according to the decision of the majlis tarjih and tajdid muhammadiyah and the opinions of the scholars of the four Madzhab. This research method is a type of literature, and qualitative model, which relies on the method of content analysis and comparison. The result of the study was that the difference of opinion between the tarjih council and the four Madzhab only occurred on two issues: first, the law of musical instruments, and second, singing that was hummed by certain rules that made the heart fall apart. The council of tarjih and tajdid holds that both are permissible as long as they do not contain things that are forbidden by Shari'a, and stick to the original rule of law, that is, everything is permissible. While the four Madzhab think that such singing is without the legal instrument makruh and reprehensible, either makruh which means better abandoned, as the opinion of jumhur or makruh meaning haram as hanafiyyah opinion, as if accompanied by musical instruments then they agreed on the prohibition, arguing with the evidence of the Quran, sunnah, and ijma'.