Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara
Imam Sucipto
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PAHAM INKAR AS-SUNNAH DAN PROPAGANDANYA TENTANG HADIS NABI SAW (STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP PANDANGAN INKAR AS-SUNNAH TENTANG KEDUDUKAN DAN KEHUJJAHAN HADIS NABI SAW) Faridi Faridi; Imam Sucipto; Engkos Kosasih
Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara Vol 5, No 1 (2023): JSHN VOL 5 NO 1 JUNI 2023
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/jshn.v5i1.15032

Abstract

This research aims to answer the accusations of the Inkar as-Sunnah who rejectthe hadiths of the Prophet, either in whole or in part. This study used the libraryresearch method by tracing and examining the books of scholars, journal articles,youtube etc. There are two very basic doubts argued by munkiru as-Sunnah inaccording with this problem; namely first, the inauthenticity of hadith since it hadbeen only written after the Prophet Muhammad died, so that they only adhered tothe Qur’an as a source of Islamic teachings and second, the rejection of hadithĀhād for its poorness of trustworthy. These two doubts are answered, first by thefact that some of the Prophet's companions had written hadith since he still alive.Meanwhile, the following doubts are disputed by the validity of religious teachings,even though only conveyed by one or two men.
ISTINBĀṬ AL-AḤKĀM IN CLASSICAL SUNNI JURISPRUDENCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE FOUR MADHHABS Deasy Silvya Sari; Imam Sucipto
istinbath Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026): Contextualizing Islamic Law and Economics
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ijhi.v25i1.1094

Abstract

The discourse on istinbāṭ al-aḥkām the derivation of Islamic legal rulings remains central to understanding how Islamic law maintains its relevance across time and context. This study explores istinbāṭ al-aḥkām as a dynamic epistemological framework within classical jurisprudence, focusing on how the four major Sunni jurists Abū Ḥanīfah, Mālik ibn Anas, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs al-Syāfi‘ī, and Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal constructed distinct yet complementary methodologies in applying revelation to social realities. Employing a qualitative library-based approach, the research analyzes primary classical sources such as al-Risālah and al-Muwaṭṭa’, alongside modern interpretations by Kamali, Auda, and Aziz, through a comparative-descriptive method. Data were collected through textual documentation and analyzed through content and comparative synthesis to identify the distinctive reasoning patterns of each imam. The findings reveal that the four imams shared common sources of law al-Qur’ān, al-Sunnah, ijmā‘, and qiyās but diverged in methodological emphasis: Abū Ḥanīfah through rational-analogical reasoning (istiḥsān), Mālik through communal practice and maṣlaḥah, al-Syāfi‘ī through linguistic textualism, and Aḥmad through transmitted authenticity. This diversity demonstrates that istinbāṭ al-aḥkām functions as a plural yet unified system of reasoning, balancing revelation, reason, and context. The study concludes that methodological plurality in uṣūl al-fiqh strengthens, rather than fragments, Islamic jurisprudence, ensuring its adaptability and ethical coherence across changing times and conditions.
Co-Authors Deasy Silvya Sari engkos kosasih Faridi Faridi