Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Faculty of Law Udayana University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Protection Toward Balinese Arak as Intangible Cultural Heritage I.B. Deva Harista Setiawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i02.p04

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation of traditional drinks as intangible cultural heritage and to analyze the protection of Balinese Arak as one of the traditional knowledge that is used commercially in the context of intangible cultural heritage. This article uses normative legal research with statute, analytical, and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the regulation of traditional drinks as intangible cultural heritage, specifically traditional knowledge, is regulated in several laws and regulations such as the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Law No. 5 of 2017 on Advancement of Culture, Bali Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2020 on Strengthening and Promotion of Balinese Culture as well as Bali Governor Regulation Number 1 of 2020 on the Management of Balinese Fermented and/or Distilled Drink. Although IHC is for preservation, however, it can be interpreted that Law No. 5 of 2017 on Advancement of Culture is more than just preservation as it already regulates in general the commercialization of the object of cultural advancement. The protection of Balinese Arak as one of the traditional knowledge that is used commercially is protected under Articles 37 and 38 of Law No. 5 of 2017 on Advancement of Culture where the Indonesian Government gives permission to big industry and/or foreign parties who want to take advantage of Indonesian cultural advancement objects on the condition that they must meet the principle of benefit sharing as a form of protection.
Model Penguatan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal: Transplantasi Muatan Kebijakan Termasuk Benefit-Sharing Berbasis Undang-Undang Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Desak Putu Dewi Kasih; Putri Triari Dwijayanthi; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.235-252

Abstract

Regulations regarding the protection of communal intellectual property in Indonesia are currently scattered in various regulations that are not explicitly stated in the form of Laws, and do not regulate benefit-sharing comprehensively. The purpose of this research is to elaborate on a protection strengthening model of Communal Intellectual Property based on the transplantation of policy content related to works of tradition, culture, custom, traditional knowledge, genetic resources and potential geographical indications from various existing legal policies and other sources both locally, nationally and internationally into the legal form of a Law, as well as a benefit-sharing regulation mechanism related to the commercial use of Communal Intellectual Property. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, comparative, conceptual and analytical approaches. The results of the research showed that the current policy regarding Communal Intellectual Property in Indonesia is still in the hierarchy of Regulations of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and Government Regulations, namely Permenkumham 13/2017 and PP 56 of 2022. Several articles in the provisions of statutory regulations on Intellectual Property in Indonesia have regulated Communal Intellectual Property, but its nature is still very general. For stronger protection and legal certainty it is very urgent to regulate the protection policy in the form of a Law through a transplantation model of the substance of existing legal products related to Communal Intellectual Property, as well as strengthening of policy content including benefit-sharing in relation to the commercial use of Communal Intellectual Property.
Co-Authors Desak Putu Dewi Kasih I Gede Agus Kurniawan I.B. Deva Harista Setiawan Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Putri Triari Dwijayanthi