Roza Kurniati
Pulmonology Subdivision, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas/Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Difference of Survival Rate COVID-19 in Patients with Initiated Hemodialysis and Regularly Hemodialysis Deka Viotra; Harnavi Harun; Drajad Priyono; Fauzar; Roza Kurniati; Alexander Kam; Abdul Alim Rahimi; Jersivindo Ranazeri; Zaki Mahmudi Dasril
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 10 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v7i10.877

Abstract

Background: Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus called SARSCoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) has caused an international outbreak of respiratory illness described as COVID-19. This study aimed to describe the difference in the survival rate of COVID-19 induced AKI with hemodialysis and COVID-19 in patients with CKD on hemodialysis in Dr. M Djamil General Hospitals. Also, in this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of data on the factors that may be affected by COVID-19 survival rates in patients with COVID-19 induced AKI with hemodialysis and COVID-19 in patients with CKD on hemodialysis. This study was conducted to analyze the survival of COVID-19 with initiated or regular HD patients in Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, Indonesia. Methods: This study was conducted from January 2021 to July 2021 in Dr. M. Djamil General Hospital, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia. Data for this study was collected through medical records of patients admitted for COVID-19 with CKD in hemodialysis and acute renal failure induced by COVID-19 to show the demographics, comorbidities, and survival rates of the patients who underwent hemodialysis. Results: Factors associated with survival in COVID-19 with hemodialysis were COVID-19 severity and abnormal potassium serum level (Table 3). Moderate COVID-19 patients tend to survive than severe COVID-19 patients (OR 60; 95% CI 16.034 – 224.525). There was no significant difference in survival between initiated and regular HD (p = 0.829). Conclusion: There is no difference in clinical outcome from patients with COVID-19 who initiated hemodialysis or regularly HD to the survival rates.
Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Preference of One-Month (1HP) versus Three-Month (3HP) Rifapentine-Based Regimens for Latent Tuberculosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of HIV, Silicosis, and General Risk Populations Muhammad Ridwan; Roza Kurniati; Fauzar
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i3.1544

Abstract

Background: The programmatic management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is undergoing a paradigm shift from long-course isoniazid monotherapy to short-course rifamycin-based regimens. While the 3-month weekly rifapentine/isoniazid (3HP) regimen is well-established, the ultra-short 1-month daily rifapentine/isoniazid (1HP) regimen offers a potential advancement in adherence. However, concerns regarding systemic hypersensitivity reactions, hepatotoxicity mechanisms, and efficacy in non-HIV populations like silicosis remain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) utilizing a random-effects frequentist model. We executed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials comparing rifapentine-based regimens. We analyzed data comprising over 10,000 participants to evaluate the efficacy (prevention of active TB), safety (hepatotoxicity and hypersensitivity), and completion rates of 1HP, 3HP, 4-month rifampin (4R), and 9-month isoniazid (9H). We specifically integrated novel data on silicosis patients and patient preference metrics. Results: The network analysis demonstrated that 1HP was non-inferior to 9H in preventing active tuberculosis (Incidence Rate Difference: -0.02 per 100 person-years). 1HP achieved the highest treatment completion rate (97%), significantly superior to 3HP (82%) and 9H (69%). Safety analysis revealed a distinct divergence: 3HP was associated with a higher incidence of systemic flu-like drug reactions (3.5%) compared to 9H (0.4%), whereas 1HP demonstrated a safety profile that minimized both the hepatotoxicity of isoniazid and the hypersensitivity of intermittent rifapentine. In silicosis patients, modified 1-month regimens proved safe. However, preference analysis indicated that 81% of patients preferred the weekly dosing of 3HP over the daily burden of 1HP. Conclusion: 1HP represents the most effective strategy for maximizing treatment completion without compromising bactericidal activity. The daily dosing of 1HP appears to induce immune tolerance, mitigating the hypersensitivity reactions observed in weekly 3HP dosing. While 3HP remains a viable option for those preferring less frequent dosing, 1HP is the superior clinical recommendation for rapid sterilization of latent reservoirs.
Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Preference of One-Month (1HP) versus Three-Month (3HP) Rifapentine-Based Regimens for Latent Tuberculosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of HIV, Silicosis, and General Risk Populations Muhammad Ridwan; Roza Kurniati; Fauzar
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i3.1544

Abstract

Background: The programmatic management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is undergoing a paradigm shift from long-course isoniazid monotherapy to short-course rifamycin-based regimens. While the 3-month weekly rifapentine/isoniazid (3HP) regimen is well-established, the ultra-short 1-month daily rifapentine/isoniazid (1HP) regimen offers a potential advancement in adherence. However, concerns regarding systemic hypersensitivity reactions, hepatotoxicity mechanisms, and efficacy in non-HIV populations like silicosis remain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) utilizing a random-effects frequentist model. We executed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials comparing rifapentine-based regimens. We analyzed data comprising over 10,000 participants to evaluate the efficacy (prevention of active TB), safety (hepatotoxicity and hypersensitivity), and completion rates of 1HP, 3HP, 4-month rifampin (4R), and 9-month isoniazid (9H). We specifically integrated novel data on silicosis patients and patient preference metrics. Results: The network analysis demonstrated that 1HP was non-inferior to 9H in preventing active tuberculosis (Incidence Rate Difference: -0.02 per 100 person-years). 1HP achieved the highest treatment completion rate (97%), significantly superior to 3HP (82%) and 9H (69%). Safety analysis revealed a distinct divergence: 3HP was associated with a higher incidence of systemic flu-like drug reactions (3.5%) compared to 9H (0.4%), whereas 1HP demonstrated a safety profile that minimized both the hepatotoxicity of isoniazid and the hypersensitivity of intermittent rifapentine. In silicosis patients, modified 1-month regimens proved safe. However, preference analysis indicated that 81% of patients preferred the weekly dosing of 3HP over the daily burden of 1HP. Conclusion: 1HP represents the most effective strategy for maximizing treatment completion without compromising bactericidal activity. The daily dosing of 1HP appears to induce immune tolerance, mitigating the hypersensitivity reactions observed in weekly 3HP dosing. While 3HP remains a viable option for those preferring less frequent dosing, 1HP is the superior clinical recommendation for rapid sterilization of latent reservoirs.