Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Academia Praja : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Pemerintahan dan Administrasi Publik JDP (Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan)
Riant Nugroho
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Proses Kebijakan di Daerah: Formulasi Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Riau tentang Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai Reski Lestari; Riant Nugroho; Syed Agung Afandi
T JDP (JURNAL DINAMIKA PEMERINTAHAN) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Januari 2021
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Abdurrab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36341/jdp.v4i1.1632

Abstract

The decline in watershed conditions in Indonesia was marked by an increase in landslides, erosion and sedimentation, flooding, and drought. Each watershed has its own problems, so that in watershed management, special rules are needed to regulate problems in the watershed. The management of the Riau Province watershed requires specific regulations governing the Riau Province watershed in accordance with the clarification of the watershed. In this case, an initiative draft of the DPRD Commission B appeared in the management of watersheds in Riau Province. This article uses a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis methods, data collection is done by interview, observation and documentation. The results showed that in the formulation of the Riau Province Regional Regulation on Watershed Management, there were several processes and stages, namely the formulation of problems, the policy agenda, the selection of alternative policies to solve problems, and finally the stage of determining the policy. From the formulation process that was carried out, the initial draft with the draft after the Plenary Meeting that had been carried out did not experience significant changes, the changes only revolved around adding concepts in watershed management which were embodied in the Regional Regulation Draft.
G-20 SUMMIT 2022 LESSON LEARNED: THE DEFENSE DIPLOMACY LENSES Rui Duarte; Anak Agung Banyu Perwita; Jonni Mahroza; Herlina Juni Risma Saragih; Editha Praditya; Riant Nugroho
Jurnal Academia Praja Vol 6 No 2 (2023): Academia Praja : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Pemerintahan, dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Universitas Jenderal Ahmad Yani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36859/jap.v6i2.1764

Abstract

As the president of G-20 in 2022, Indonesia held the Summit of 19 countries plus one region, representing 80% of the world's GDP, 75% of global exports, and 60% of the global population. Indonesia's interests in G-20 Bali were on strategic and direct appeal. The strategic benefits were (a) taking G 20 as a strategic forum to discuss global issues: global health, financial stability, and climate change, (b) showcasing Indonesia's economic recovery efforts during the Covid-19 pandemic, and (c) showcasing Indonesia's role as a meeting leader that will support the formation of global policies. The immediate benefits were (a) an increase in foreign exchange from delegation visits to Indonesia, (b) a revival of the hospitality sector, (c) support for the increase in domestic consumption, (d) optimising the role of MSMEs, and (e) increase employment absorption. Using the defence diplomacy lens instrument, the research found that the Summit has reached a profound performance, as the total commission is reaching 3,89 from 4.00. The economic interest of the nation has been delivered at the score of 3.66, which means the level of defence diplomacy has almost reached the 4th level –the regulator—which puts Indonesia as a very high-impact country. The political interest was delivered at the score of 2.00, which means the performance level was facilitator, the ow impact country. The general interest was shown at a 3.00 score, which means the negotiator, which means that Indonesia might have been a high-impact country.
GOVERNANCE: STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND CHAOTIC Riant Nugroho; Agustina Setiawan
Jurnal Academia Praja Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Academia Praja : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Pemerintahan, dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Universitas Jenderal Ahmad Yani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36859/jap.v8i2.4545

Abstract

Governance is the key success of Government. The reforming governance among developing countries is difficult, costly, and exhausted. It was caused by the less-comprehensive of the understanding of governance itself. There are three types or mode of governance, historically: static, dynamic, and chaotic. The static is governance concept which was develop in 1980s and still as mainstream until today practices among Government, includes in Indonesia. The finding of the second types of dynamic governance has been introduced, but in fact it was facing some new challenges from character of the people to the policy. Some countries with factor of a fit culture for dynamic governance are effectively able to develop the capabilities to exercise governance. Some other countries do not have, or they have but insufficient. Chaotic governance is the new imperative for today and tomorrow government. It is governance in the digital age. Scholars and leaders of Governments need to have a same premise and commitment to use the recent technology of digital profoundly.
Co-Authors Afandi, Syed Agung Anak Agung Banyu Perwita Editha Praditya Herlina Juni Risma Saragih Mahroza, Jonni Reski Lestari Rui Duarte Setiawan, Agustina