Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Scientia Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion
Surya Hamdani
Universitas Haji Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ENHANCEMENT OF ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL EFFECTIVENESS REVIEWS IN CORRUPTION CASES Saritua Silitonga; Sarah Furqoni; Muhammad Dhobit Azhary Lubis; Surya Hamdani
Jurnal Scientia Vol. 12 No. 03 (2023): Education, Sosial science and Planning technique, 2023 (June-August)
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

It seems like you've provided a description of a specific corruption case and the challenges associated with prosecuting and recovering state losses in such cases. This paper discussed difficulties law enforcement faces when dealing with corruption cases and executing judgments related to the return of embezzled state funds. The case of I Putu Sudiartana, who was found guilty of corruption by a District Court Judge, exemplifies these challenges. The research methodology used in the case appears to be normative jurisdiction, which involves analyzing legal principles and regulations. The study draws on both primary data sources, obtained from informants and parties related to the issue, and secondary data sources, such as relevant documents and literature. The primary challenge highlighted is the difficulty in recovering state funds from corrupt individuals. Perpetrators of corruption often hide their ill-gotten gains in financial systems and legitimate business activities, making it challenging for law enforcement, including the Attorney General's office, to trace and seize these assets. The phrase "payment of replacement money" likely refers to the process of recovering the embezzled funds by requiring the convicted individual to pay back the equivalent amount of money they obtained through corruption. This process encounters obstacles due to the complex financial maneuvers used by corrupt individuals to hide their assets. Overall, the passage discusses the complexities and challenges faced by law enforcement and prosecutors in handling corruption cases, particularly when it comes to recovering state losses and executing judgments for the return of embezzled funds. It highlights the need for more effective strategies and measures to tackle corruption and enhance asset recovery efforts.
Reconstructing Corporate Environmental Sanctions through Ecological Justice in Indonesia Saritua Silitonga; Anggiat p. Simamora; Surya Hamdani; Sarah Furgoni
Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): June
Publisher : MASI Mandiri Edukasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58421/misro.v5i2.1582

Abstract

Corporate environmental crime in Indonesia raises a difficult socio-legal problem: sanctions may punish polluting corporations while damaged ecosystems remain unrestored. This article examines how sanctions against corporate polluters are constructed under Indonesian law and how they should be reconstructed in light of ecological justice. The study uses normative legal research with socio-legal sensitivity, applying statutory, conceptual, and prescriptive approaches to legislation, corporate liability doctrine, environmental sanction provisions, and the ecological justice literature. The findings show that Indonesian law recognises corporate criminal liability and additional sanctions, including restoration, profit confiscation, closure of business activities, fulfilment of neglected obligations, and corporate supervision. However, the framework is weakened by discretionary restoration orders, evidentiary difficulty, institutional fragmentation, and an anthropocentric legal culture. The article contributes a restoration-oriented reconstruction model that places ecological recovery, unlawful gain removal, corporate compliance reform, and executable institutional mechanisms at the centre of environmental punishment. It argues that sanctions should be assessed not merely by their punitive severity, but by their capacity to repair ecological harm and prevent recurrence.
Co-Authors Anggiat p. Simamora Muhammad Dhobit Azhary Lubis Sarah Furgoni Sarah Furqoni Saritua Silitonga