Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bimbingan Teknis Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan dengan Metode Mediasi sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Junaidi Junaidi; Indianto Indianto; Randi Aritama; Mila Surahmi; Desmawaty Romli; Citra Dewi; M. Martindo Merta; Zaimah Husin
Jurnal Pengabdian UNDIKMA Vol. 4 No. 4 (2023): November
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jpu.v4i4.8968

Abstract

This community service aims to provide understanding and community empowerment regarding land dispute resolution using mediation methods following laws and regulations to increase public legal awareness in Sirah Pulau Padang District, Ogan Komering Ilir Regency, South Sumatra Province. Implementing this service used technical guidance and interactive discussions—data collection methods through questionnaires, interviews, and observations. Based on the evaluation results, it was found that 50.5% of the participants understood very well, 13.5% understood, 27.2% understood quite well, 5.9% did not understand, and 2.9% did not understand. The results of this service showed that the community's understanding of other options in resolving land conflicts had increased, namely using mediation methods that could save time cost and have a simple process to reach an agreement. Village heads could resolve land conflicts in the community through mediation, following applicable laws and regulations.
The Balance Between Judicial Process Efficiency And Justice In The Implementation Of Plea Bargaining In The National Criminal Code (KUHP) Hendra; Tri Nugroho Akbar; M. Martindo Merta
Justice Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Justice Law Review
Publisher : PT Justitia Legal Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64317/jlr.v2i1.30

Abstract

The implementation of plea bargaining in Indonesia's criminal justice system, although offering efficiency in resolving cases, must be carried out with caution to ensure a balance between the efficiency of the judicial process and fairness for the defendant. This mechanism, which is included in Article 199 of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RKUHAP), aims to expedite the judicial process by allowing case resolution through an agreement between the public prosecutor and the defendant. However, the main challenge in its implementation is ensuring that plea bargaining does not sacrifice the defendant's rights, especially in cases involving serious crimes. Therefore, while this mechanism can reduce case backlogs and speed up legal processes, it is crucial to maintain transparency, protect human rights, and prevent system abuse. Clear regulations in the RKUHAP and strict supervision from the judiciary and society are essential to ensure that the application of plea bargaining aligns with the principles of substantive justice, without infringing on the defendant's rights.