Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peran Sat. Polairud Polres Baubau Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Ilegal Fishing di Wilayah Hukum Perairan Polres Baubau Darojatun Andara; Kaswandi; Muhammad Yasri Susanto
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i1.5354

Abstract

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Peran Sat. Polairud Polres Baubau Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Ilegal Fishing di Wilayah Hukum Perairan Polres Baubau. jenis penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Upaya preventif dan represif dilakukan oleh Satpolairud Polres Baubau untuk mencegah perburuan ilegal di perairan Baubau. Upaya preventif mencakup meningkatkan sosialisasi peraturan perundang-undangan kepada masyarakat dan meningkatkan patroli diperairan sesuai dengan jangkauan tugas mereka. Upaya represif, yaitu mengambil tindakan tegas terhadap mereka yang melakukan perburuan ilegal dengan tujuan untuk memberikan efek jera dan terus-menerus memberikan arahan agar mereka tidak melakukan hal yang sama di masa depan. Hambatan Satpolairud Polres Baubau dalam penangulangan illegal fishing yaitu kurangnya personil, dan sumber daya manusia nelayan yang masih terbilang rendah, kelengkapan sarana dan fasilitas pendukung yang masih terbatas dalam meningkatkan patroli rutin dalam melaksanakan tugas pengawasan, perlindungan dan pengayoman masyarakan khsusunya nelayan di perairan Kata Kunci: Polairud baubau, Penegakan Hukum, Ilegal Fishing
Testing Witness Testimony According to the Criminal Code and Qanun Kaswandi; Hayun; Muh Sutri Mansyah
Justice Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Justice Law Review
Publisher : PT Justitia Legal Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64317/jlr.v1i1.18

Abstract

Witnesses who testify in court are required to speak the truth; however, there are also instances where witnesses provide false testimony. The challenges of implementing Articles 291 and 373 of the current Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and Article 170 of the Aceh Qanun in prosecuting witnesses who give false testimony are important to examine and analyze. This research uses a normative method with legislative, historical, conceptual, and futuristic approaches. The analytical techniques employed in this study are descriptive and prescriptive. Legal materials are analyzed by evaluating the collected data. The interpretation methods used are systematic and grammatical. The findings of this study show that the primary objective of Articles 291 and 373 of the current Indonesian Criminal Code and Article 170 of the Aceh Qanun is to ensure that witnesses provide truthful testimony in court based on what they have seen, experienced, or heard, whether directly or indirectly. However, challenges also arise in prosecuting witnesses who give false testimony. There is potential for multiple interpretations because neither Articles 291 and 373 of the Criminal Code nor Article 170 of the Aceh Qanun specify how many times a witness must give false testimony before these articles can be applied, or whether a single instance of false testimony is sufficient for the application of these articles. This creates the potential for judges to apply these articles subjectively. Therefore, future legislation by the government and lawmakers must establish clear benchmarks for determining when a witness has provided false testimony.