Muhammad Shiddiq Abdillah
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Meninggalkan Salat Berjemaah Tanpa Uzur Menurut Perspektif Mazhab Syafii dan Mazhab Hambali Irman Irman; Muhammad Shiddiq Abdillah; Awal Rifai
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol 2 No 4 (2023): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v2i4.1101

Abstract

This research aims to find out what the law is for leaving congregational prayers without delay according to the perspective of the Syafii school of thought and the Hambali school of thought. The problems that researchers raise in this research are: First, what is the position of congregational prayer in Islam. Second, what is the law regarding leaving congregational prayers without delay according to the Syafii school of thought and the Hambali school of thought. This research is library research. This research uses a type of qualitative descriptive research (non-statistical), which focuses on the study of manuscripts and texts, using normative and comparative approach methods. The results of the research show that congregational prayer has an important position and role in Islam, congregational prayer can strengthen the bonds of brotherhood among Muslims. Apart from that, congregational prayer also has many virtues and wisdom, congregational prayer is twenty-five to twenty-seven degrees more important than praying alone. According to the Syafii school of thought, there are three opinions regarding the law of congregational prayer, some are of the opinion that it is sunnah muakadah, some are of the opinion that it is fardu kifayah and there are others that are of the opinion that the law is fardu ain, but the most valid in the Syafii school of thought is the law of fardu kifayah, while the Hambali school of thought is of the opinion that the law is fardu ain. The Syafii school of thought is of the opinion that it is not permissible to leave congregational prayers without a reason, and they are of the opinion that the prayer of someone who prays alone but in congregation is better. Meanwhile, the Hambali school of thought has different opinions regarding the law of leaving congregational prayers, the first opinion says the prayer is invalid while the second opinion says the prayer is valid but one is guilty of leaving the obligation, namely congregational prayer. It is hoped that the implications of this research will provide scientific insight and become a reference on the legal issue of leaving congregational prayers without delay.
Hukum Investasi Saham Menurut DSN-MUI dan AAOIFI: Tinjauan Fikih Muamalah Muhammad Shiddiq Abdillah; Islahuddin Ramadhan Mubarak; Andi Khaula Al Hannan
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol 2 No 6 (2023): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v2i6.1574

Abstract

This research aims to determine the legal status of stock investment according to DSN-MUI and AAOIFI and to analyze their opinions from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh muamalah). This study employs a descriptive qualitative method through library research. The findings of the research are as follows. Firstly, DSN-MUI holds that investment in joint-stock companies with elements of usurious transactions is permissible under certain conditions and requirements. Secondly, AAOIFI also considers it permissible under specific conditions and requirements. Thirdly, based on the analysis of fiqh muamalah, the correct opinion is that trading in stocks is entirely prohibited if there are elements of usury or impermissibility within a company. Despite various considerations of fiqh principles, maslahat istishlahiy, and other rules, it remains prohibited because the prohibition of usury is clear in the Quran, which states that Allah permits trade and forbids usury. Based on the results of this research, it is advised for those who wish to invest in joint-stock companies to first investigate the company they are interested in. If there are usurious transactions within it, participation in the company is prohibited. However, if there are no usurious transactions, then participation in the company is allowed.
Aktualisasi Kaidah al-Ḥājah Tunazzalu Manzilah al-Ḍarūrah pada Akad Istiṣnā’ Paralel Nurhikmah Huswat; Muhammad Shiddiq Abdillah; Riska Riska
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol 3 No 4 (2024): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1651

Abstract

The study aims to determine the Actualization of al-Ḥājah Tunazzalu Manzilah Al-Ḍarūrah’s rules (Necessity is treated as emergency) in parallel istishna’sale and purchase. This research is employs a qualitative descriptive research approach focused on the analysis of manuscripts and texts,utilizing normative and analytical methods. From the research findings it was discovered that the application of the principle of al-Ḥājah Tunazzalu Manzilah Al-Ḍarūrah in parallel istiṣnā’contracts has been actualized by observing that initially, the legality of parallel istiṣnā’contracts was prohibited due to certain transaction modes not conforming to the provisions of Islamic commercial law. For instance, a party acting as Ṣāni’ to sell goods without prosessing them. Or when acting as the manufacturer, not meeting the criteria as a genuine producer because they require someone else to fulfill the order. The principle in Islamic jurisprudence of al-Ḥājah Tunazzalu Manzilah Al-Ḍarūrah explains that urgent needs criteria can occupy an emergency position, specially primary or fundamental needs. For example, humans require housing to ensure safety and security in their lives but lack funds to purchase a home and have no other means available. In such conditions, parallel istiṣnā’ contracts are permissible. This akigns with the principle of al-Ḥājah Tunazzalu Manzilah Al-Ḍarūrah, which elucidates the position where needs can occupy an emergency situation. The implications of this research are to strengthen Islamic legal theory, provide practical guidance in the Islamic financial sector, address contract limitations, and offer boundaries and understanding of the provisions set by Islamic law.