Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS)
Nadhira Zahra Farida
Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of the Development of the State Administrative Court System (Case Study of Decision No. 35/G/2019/PTUN.SRG) Tiara Bastari Putri; Nadhira Zahra Farida; Alfatesya Haifa; Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana
Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2023): IPMHI Law Journal, January 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang in collaboration with Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v3i1.57727

Abstract

Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia terus mengalami perkembangan seiring dengan kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan. Perkembangan ini dapat dibuktikan dari pengesahan UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 terkait perubahan UU No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Selain oleh undang-undang tersebut, perkembangan sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara juga dipengaruhi oleh UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Adapun salah satu perkembangan yang paling terlihat adalah adanya perluasan subjek dan objek dalam sengketa tata usaha negara. Pengertian Keputusan Administrasi Pemerintahan/Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara menurut UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 berbeda dengan pengertian menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1986. Hal yang membedakan adalah dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 1986, keputusan harus bersifat konkrit, individual, dan final serta menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi orang atau badan hukum perdata. Sementara, menurut UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 hal tersebut tidak disyaratkan. Dengan adanya perluasan ini, maka kewenangan PTUN dalam mengadili suatu KTUN semakin meluas. Salah satu contoh penerapan dari perluasan objek sengketa ini adalah dengan adanya Putusan PTUN No. 35/G/2019/PTUN.SRG yang mengabulkan gugatan 6 mahasiswa kepada Direktur PKN STAN atas objek sengketa berupa surat keputusan yang menyatakan bahwa 6 mahasiswa ini tidak lulus dalam ujian. Majelis Hakim dalam amar putusannya memutuskan untuk mengabulkan gugatan Penggugat dengan pertimbangan bahwa Keputusan tersebut dibentuk tanpa memperhatikan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik yaitu asas kecermatan dan asas penyelenggaraan tertib penyelenggaraan negara.
Akibat Hukum Perceraian terhadap Harta Bersama pada Pasangan Tanpa Perjanjian Perkawinan dan Istri yang Menjalankan Kewajiban Suami dalam Mencari Nafkah Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Nadhira Zahra Farida; Djanuardi Djanuardi; Sherly MIS
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): Desember: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v3i4.4323

Abstract

In the context of marriage law in Indonesia, divorce brings a number of legal consequences, one of which is the division of joint property. This situation becomes more complex when the couple does not have a marriage agreement and when the wife carries out her husband's obligations in earning a living. Examples of cases like this are contained in Supreme Court Decision Number 266/K/AG/2010 and Supreme Court Decision Number 1636/K/Pdt/2018. This research aims to explain the legal provisions and legal consequences of divorce on the distribution of joint assets between couples without a marriage agreement and wives who carry out their husband's obligations based on the perspective of marriage law and Islamic law. This research uses a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive research specifications. Data collection techniques were carried out through literature study and interviews. The data analysis method used is qualitative juridical. The research results show that in resolving the implementation of the division of joint assets in marriage in Indonesia, legal practitioners can be guided by the Marriage Law and the Civil Code as the legal basis for resolving the division of marital assets. This is in accordance with Article 37 of the Marriage Law which states that in the event of a divorce, joint property is regulated according to respective laws. However, if there is a case where the wife carries out her husband's obligations in terms of earning a living, it will be returned in accordance with the Judge's decision based on consideration of supporting evidence and the portion of each party's contribution to the joint assets collected.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Hukum Terkait Skema Ponzi : Perspektif Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam Perlindungan Investor Rendy Claudio Krisna Iroth; Nadhira Zahra Farida; Ilham Daffi Syabana
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Maret: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v4i1.4826

Abstract

In Indonesia, the use of technology to make investments is getting easier as time goes by. However, it is unfortunate that some companies and individuals use this technology to run illegal businesses without a license from the Financial Services Authority. One form of illegal business that is on the rise is the Ponzi scheme system. A Ponzi scheme is a form of financial fraud in which the perpetrator offers a high rate of return/profit to investors, which is paid using newly incoming funds from subsequent investors. This research uses normative juridical research method, which is a legal research method conducted with the aim of finding legal principles and theories associated with existing practices in the field. This research is conducted by comparing the legal approach between the regulations in Indonesia and the United States related to Ponzi Schemes. Considering that in Indonesia the legal arrangements regarding Ponzi Schemes are generalized which makes Indonesia have no legal certainty for the protection of investors, through comparison with one of the countries with developed economies, namely the United States. This aims to provide a better understanding of the different legal approaches and efforts that can be made to overcome the Ponzi Scheme problem and can provide education to the public who may have a layman's understanding of Ponzi scheme investments.
Co-Authors Adikancana, Santi Hapsari Dewi Alfatesya Haifa Djanuardi, Monica L. Ilham Daffi Syabana Rendy Claudio Krisna Iroth Sherly MIS Tiara Bastari Putri