Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

REPOSITIONING THE ROLE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTORS AS DOMINUS LITIS IN CORRUPTION CASES: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW IN GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT: Raden Nanda Setiawan; Reda Manthovani; Agus Surono; Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Focus Journal : Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Focus Journal Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2
Publisher : Universitas Bali Dwipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62795/fjl.v5i2.304

Abstract

This study aims to examine the urgency and potential of applying the Economic Analysis of Law Principle by the State Attorney of Indonesia in its capacity as Dominus Litis in handling corruption cases, in this case in the Government Procurement sector. This study aims to determine the policy related to the authority of the State Attorney as Dominus Litis in handling corruption cases in government procurement. This research is a normative legal study, as well as a case approach using illustrations of corruption cases related to government procurement of goods and services. This approach aims to build the author's legal argument through a review of cases related to the issues to be examined in this paper. Therefore, this research uses a descriptive approach in the form of prescriptive research. The results of this study are the existing conditions of the role of the Public Prosecutor as Dominus Litis to be applied in handling corruption cases in government procurement of goods and services, because the Public Prosecutor has been ineffective in considering the economic value of a prosecution policy. The repositioning of the role of the Public Prosecutor is necessary so that they do not only focus on formal and material evidence, but also consider the social and economic costs. The implications of the Economic Analysis of Law approach reveal that efforts to recover state losses and long-term prevention are more important than current criminalization.  
Analysis of Burnout and Job Satisfaction with Intention to Leave among Indonesian Nurses in post Pandemic in Saudi Arabia Uswatin, Nurul; Yayi Suryo Prabandari; Agus Surono; Fahruddin, Akhir
Jurnal Berita Ilmu Keperawatan Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): January
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/bik.v17i1.3877

Abstract

The Covid pandemic has ended but health workers, especially nurses in Saudi Arabia, are still experiencing burnout due to high workloads. This study aims to analyze burnout and job satisfaction related to intention to leave among Indonesian nurses in health services in Saudi Arabia. This research used a qualitative method with a case-study approach. The research subjects used purposive sampling with a typical case of 12 Indonesian nurses who worked in health services and terminated their work contracts in Saudi Arabia. This research used data triangulation, source triangulation, and peer debriefing. In-depth interviews conducted at a predetermined place, data analysis follows 7 steps of Colaizzi's analysis. The results showed that burnout was closely related to emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low appreciation for one's abilities. Indonesian nurses who worked in health services in Saudi Arabia were happy and did not experience burnout. Meanwhile, job satisfaction or nurse satisfaction in dealing with work situations and environments is related to internal factors such as salary and rights to work facilities, while externally, it is related to self-development and professionalism.
Strengthening the Institutional System for Management Confiscated Items on Evidence of The Object of Collateral in Corruption in Indonesia La Uli; Agus Surono; Adek Junjunan Syaid
Fast in Social Sciences Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): December
Publisher : Forum Akademisi dan Dosen Peneliti (FAST)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37640/p136at13

Abstract

This research discusses the strengthening of the institutional system for managing confiscated evidence in corruption cases in Indonesia. The study employs a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, focusing on a literature review of relevant regulations, legal principles, and theories. The research also uses an approach to laws and regulations and case studies to analyze issues related to the mismanagement of confiscated evidence. The findings suggest that the management of confiscated evidence should be entrusted to the RUPBASAN institution, which would be responsible for storing, maintaining, and securing the evidence to preserve its value and quality. RUPBASAN should not have any other interests besides evidence management. This study proposes granting RUPBASAN full authority over confiscated evidence, supported by legal frameworks and supervised by the President, to avoid overlapping authority with other institutions such as the police, the prosecutor's office, and the KPK. Furthermore, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 44 (1), and Government Regulation No. 27 of 1983 outline the RUPBASAN's role in storing confiscated evidence. This concept also includes the sale of evidence that has permanent legal force, with proceeds directed into state revenue through Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP). This approach aims to avoid misuse, damage, and accumulation of confiscated evidence at RUPBASAN, while providing economic benefits through interest on the funds from evidence sales deposited in banks. Ultimately, the concept seeks to enhance the management of confiscated evidence, ensuring justice and legal certainty for all parties involved.
Tinnitus Mechanisms, Comorbidities and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies Fitria Waffi Nur Aini; Agus Surono; Ashadi Prasetyo
JURNAL IMPLEMENTA HUSADA Vol 7, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : UMSU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/jih.v7i2.26178

Abstract

Tinnitus is the perception of sound without an external source and affects about one tenth of the population, with a small proportion experiencing severe disability. It arises from cochlear injury, central auditory hyperexcitability, maladaptive neuroplasticity, and involvement of limbic, prefrontal, and somatosensory systems, with additional contributions from inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic factors. This narrative review summarizes current concepts of tinnitus mechanisms, frequent psychological, auditory, somatosensory, and systemic comorbidities, and available treatments. The strongest evidence supports psychological and sound based interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy, counseling, hearing rehabilitation, and tinnitus retraining therapy, which reduce distress and improve daily functioning even when loudness changes little. Pharmacological therapy mainly targets comorbid depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Adequate intake of zinc and iron may help prevent tinnitus. Despite several promising options, clinical evidence remains heterogeneous and no single therapy is universally effective, so individualized multidisciplinary care informed by underlying mechanisms and further supported by advances in basic research, biomarker development, and rigorous clinical trials is required.
Business Judgment Rule (BJR) Principle in Relation to Corruption Offenses in Regionally Owned Enterprises Muhammad Olik Abdul Holik; Agus Surono; Agung Iriantoro; Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/kwz5j396

Abstract

This research examines legal protection for directors of Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD) through the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in the context of liability for corporate losses often associated with corruption offenses. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing BJR in BUMD governance in Indonesia, examine director liability for corporate losses from the BJR perspective, and formulate a regulatory reform model to provide legal certainty and protection for BUMD directors. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature review and interviews. The findings indicate that BJR application is essential to distinguish between legitimate business risks and criminal offenses. Therefore, regulatory reform is necessary to clearly incorporate BJR principles such as good faith, due care, and rational business judgment as the basis for legal protection of BUMD directors. Such regulation is expected to enhance legal certainty, prevent criminalization of business decisions, and strengthen sound and professional governance of regional enterprises.
Perlindungan Hak Korban Pengadaan Tanah untuk Pembangunan Jalan Tol di Kabupaten Kendal Agus Surono
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 17 No 4 (2017): Edisi Desember
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.391-409

Abstract

Secara yuridis UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah, telah memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan keadilan, namun dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan jalan tol di Kabupaten Kendal, masih banyak terjadi kesalahan administrasi yang pada akhirnya akan sangat merugikan masyarakat yang terkena dampak pembangunan jalan tol. Pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan jalan tol di 27 Desa di Kabupaten Kendal, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, masih belum memperhatikan hak-hak korban dan bahkan cenderung terjadi intimidasi dan pelanggaran hak-hak asasi manusia, serta juga terdapat berbagai kesalahan administrasi dalam tahap pengadaan tanahnya sehingga tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, dapat dikemukakan permasalahan sebagai berikut: pertama, apakah sistem pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan pembangunan jalan tol sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah telah memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi korban? Kedua, bagaimanakah hak-hak korban pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan infrastruktur jalan tol telah diberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan keadilan sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan perundang- undangan di bidang pertanahan? Ketiga, apakah pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan infrastruktur jalan tol di Kabupaten Kendal telah memberikan jaminan perlindungan hukum dan keadilan bagi korban? Sedangkan metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif, dimana data yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder dan didukung data hasil wawancara dan pengamatan langsung ketika penulis melakukan pendampingan kepada sebagaian masyarakat korban pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan jalan tol di Kabupaten Kendal, sebagai salah satu bentuk pengabdian kepada masyarakat. Selanjutnya data yang terkumpul kemudian dilakukan analisis dengan menggunakan metode analisis kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan sebagai berikut: pertama, bahwa sistem pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan pembangunan jalan tol sebagaimana diatur dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah secara subtansi telah memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi korban, yaitu terutama masyarakat yang berhak atas ganti kerugian, namun demikian dalam pelaksanaannya masih terdapat berbagai permasalahan. Kedua, bahwa hak-hak korban pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan infrastruktur jalan tol secara yuridis telah diberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dalam UU No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah, namun demikian dalam kenyataannya masih terdapat berbagai kesalahan administrasi yang sangat merugikan masyarakat terkena dampak pembangunan jalan tol. Ketiga, bahwa pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan infrastruktur jalan tol di Kabupaten Kendal belum memberikan jaminan perlindungan hukum dan keadilan bagi korban. Adapun saran yang dapat dikemukakan meliputi sebagai berikut: pertama, perlu dilakukan sosialisasi terhadap peraturan pengadaan tanah sehingga masyarakat benar-benar memahami akan hak-haknya. Kedua, perlu pelibatan pengawas dari lembaga baik aparat penegak hukum agar dapat dilakukan pencegahan praktek kesalahan administrasi, manipulasi dan markup.