Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Education Mathematics

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI POKOK HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Ikawati, Nur; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.52 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the student Adversity Quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Group Investigation with scientific approach (GI-S), the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair Share with scientific approach (TPS-S), and model of classical learning with scientific approach (K-S). The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all students of Junior High School in Bantul regency on academic year 2014/2015. The samples of  the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaires of AQ. The hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The results of the research are as follows. 1) GI-S gives better mathematics achievements than TPS-S, and both gives better mathematics achievements than K-S. 2) Students with AQ type of climber have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of camper and type of quitter, while students with AQ type of camper have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of quitter. 3) For GI-S and TPS-S, students with AQ type of climber and type of camper have the same mathematics achievements, and students with AQ type of climber and type of camper gives better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of quitter. For K-S, students with AQ type of climber have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of camper and type of quitter, and both have the same mathematics achievements. 4) For students with AQ type of climber and type of quitter, GI-S, TPS-S, and K-S gives the same mathematics achievement. For students with AQ type of camper, GI-S and TPS-S gives the same mathematics achievements, and both gives better mathematics achievements than K-S.Keywords: GI, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ 
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENILAIAN PORTOFOLIO PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERORIENTASI KEMAMPUAN AWAL Rufiana, Intan Sari; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (248.13 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to: (1) produce a learning device in STAD cooperative learning model with a portfolio that was good for the subject of algebra in seventh grade junior high school, (2) know the effectiveness of cooperative learning of STAD type with portfolio assessment when it is viewed from early ability. This research was a kind of research and development. The development procedure used in this study was the development of a learning device according Thiagarajan et al, which was consisted of four stages: define, design, development, and disseminate. In disseminate stage, the experiment was conducted with portfolio assessment. Experiments conducted on the two junior high schools, they were Muhammadiyah Yanggong junior high school and Muhammadiyah Jenangan junior high school. Based on the inferential analysis, it showed that (1) the learning outcomes of students who were taught mathematics STAD cooperative learning with portfolio assessment was better than the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught STAD cooperative learning on the subject of algebra, (2) students who had high early ability had better performance than who had low early ability, (3) in the high ability, the students who were taught by using STAD cooperative learning model with portfolio assessment had better learning achievement than the students who were taught by using STAD cooperative model STAD without portfolio assessment, (4) in the low early ability, the students who were taught using STAD cooperative learning model with portfolio assessment had the same performance with STAD cooperative learning model without portfolio assessment, (5) the students who were taught by the STAD cooperative learning without portfolio assessment, students who had high early ability had better performance than who had low early ability, and (6) the students who were taught by using STAD cooperative learning model with portfolio assessment, the students who had high early ability had better performance than the students who had early ability.Key words: Cooperative STAD, Portfolio Assessment, Early ability
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF MURDER RME DAN MURDER PADA MATERI STATISTIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS XI SMA Wahyuningtyas, Widyana; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (515.923 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student self-regulated learning. The learning models compared were MURDER (Mood Understand Recall Detect Elaborate Review) using RME (Realistic Mathematics Education) approach, MURDER, and direct learning. This study was a quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was students in grade XI science of Senior High School in Ponorogo on academic year 2015/2016. Instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire. Two ways anova with 3x3 of factorial design and significance level 0,05 are used for hypothesis test. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) MURDER RME gives better achievement than MURDER and direct learning, and MURDER gives the same achievement as direct learning, (2) students with high self-regulated learning has the same achievement as those who has middle self-regulated learning. Students who have high and middle self-regulated learning have better achievement than low self-regulated learning, (3) in the MURDER RME and MURDER, students who have high, middle, and low self-regulated learning have the same achievement. In the direct learning, students who have high self-regulated learning have the same achievement as those who have high and low self-regulated learning, and students who have high self-regulated learning have better achievement than those students who have low self-regulated learning, (4) for high self-regulated learning, MURDER RME produces better achievement than MURDER; MURDER RME and MURDER produce the same achievement as direct learning. For middle and lowself-regulated learning, MURDER RME, MURDER, and direct learning produce the same achievement which is categorized as good.Keywords: MURDER, RME, Self-Regulated Learning
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENTS (TGT) PADA MATERI LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KABUPATEN WONOGIRI Murdoko, Yustinus; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (493.096 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning models compared were TAI (Team Assisted Individualization), TGT (Teams Games tournament) and direct teaching learning. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of junior high school  in Wonogiri regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of sample was 234 students consisted of 77 students in the first experimental group, 76 students on the second experimenta groupl, and 81 students on the tirth experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test, questioner, and the likert scale instrument. The data was analyzed using analisis of variance two way.  Conclusions of the research were as follow. (1) the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievements of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model; (1) the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievements of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model; (2) the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic styles have the same learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have the same learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning style, the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: TAI, TGT, direct learning, learning style, achievement
Co-Authors Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Arianto, Febri ‘Aini, Addin Zuhrotul Budi Usodo Cahyono, Heri Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dewi, Noviana Sukma Ikawati, Nur Intan Sari Rufiana Iswahyudi, Gatut Juniarto, Suci KH, Abdul Aziz Lestari, Fajar Marfuah, Ismiyati Murdoko, Yustinus Muslikhah, Muslikhah Musmiratul Uyun Pambudi, Pangesti Arum Primasari, Dessy Marlinda Proborini, Ellen Purnamasari, Anita Rahayu, Nastiti Riyadi Riyadi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Roswitha, Mania Rosyida, Entyka Mayhasti Safitri, Rini Dewi Savitri, Maria Endah Sri Subanti Sujadi, Imam Suprapto, Suprapto Suryanto, Suryanto Sutrima, Sutrima Thalib, Faradila Triyanto, Triyanto Utin Desy Susiaty Wahyuningtyas, Widyana Wardani, Endang Purwati Wicaksana, Hafid Widodo, An Nur Ami YAFITA ARFINA MUTI Yundari, Yundari