Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Yustitia : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Realism: Law Review
Fanny Tanuwijaya
University of Jember
Arts Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
The Legal Consequences of Heirs Not Submitting the Notary Protocol To The Regional Supervisory Board Dinda Suryo Febyanti; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Echwan Iriyanto
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 4 No. 2: November 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v4i2.43763

Abstract

The legal issue faced by heirs who do not submit a notary's protocol when a notary passes away. Although Indonesian law does not explicitly outline the responsibilities of heirs in this regard, based on this, the research subject to be examined is the legal consequences for heirs who do not submit a notary's protocol and the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board in resolving notary protocols. The research method used in this study is a notarial juridical approach, using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the legal issues. The research findings indicate that the failure to submit a notary's protocol can have negative legal consequences. Notary protocols, considered as state archives, must be preserved and maintained by notaries, and heirs do not have legal rights to them. The duty to submit notary protocols lies with the Regional Supervisory Board for documentation processes. These protocols include agreements, deeds, acknowledgments, and legal acts performed before a notary and are not part of the notary's personal estate but belong to the state. The authority of the Regional Supervisory Board in handling the handover of notary protocols. The MPD plays a vital role in receiving reports of notary deaths, facilitating the handover process, and ensuring the preservation of protocols. However, there are no specific sanctions that the MPD can impose on heirs who fail to fulfill their obligations. This legal gap may result in violations by heirs who do not report the notary's death or fail to submit the notary protocol. Therefore, this research emphasizes the importance of establishing clear and comprehensive regulations regarding the responsibilities of heirs regarding notary protocols to ensure legal certainty and clarity for all parties involved. KEYWORDS: Legal Consequences, Heirs, Notary Protocol Submission, Regional Supervisory Board
Kedudukan Keterangan Saksi Dalam Pembuatan Putusan Pidana Berkaitan Dengan Pasal 169 KUHAP (Studi Putusan Nomor: 575/Pid.B/2020/PN Cbi) Wanda Eka Sri Masrita; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v8i1.6390

Abstract

A court decision is a judge's statement regarding the criminal justice process issued by the court. The verdict contains all the facts and circumstances related to the evidence and the judge's considerations at the trial. One of the pieces of evidence is witness testimony. The position of witness testimony occupies the first position in the hierarchy of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Then how can a witness who is still in a husband and wife relationship with the defendant be used as evidence? However, the verdict is not explained explicitly in accordance with the provisions of Article 169 of the Criminal Procedure Code. If the verdict is not explained in detail, it will cause ambiguity. The author uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The verdict does not explicitly state that the witness has received approval from the public prosecutor and the defendant and the witness want it. Based on the provisions of Article 168 letter c of the Criminal Procedure Code, the testimony of a wife or husband who has a relationship with the defendant cannot be heard and can be withdrawn. A good verdict, the judge in his considerations must explain the facts and circumstances accompanied by evidence that proves the defendant's guilt. The results of this study are that a good verdict must contain all the facts during the trial process to ensure justice, certainty and benefit to the community.
Legal Consequences Of Self-Promotion By Notaries Through Social Media Yustisya Zaharon; Fendi Setyawan; Fanny Tanuwijaya
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v9i2.11523

Abstract

Social media is one example of the many uses of technology due to the current of globalization. One profession that uses social media is the profession of notary to promote themselves. The form of self-promotion by Notaries through social media is a violation of Article 4 paragraph (3) of the Notary Code of Ethics, that Notaries are prohibited from publishing or promoting themselves, either alone or together by including their name and position, using print and/or electronic media, in the form of advertisements, congratulations, thanks, marketing activities, sponsorship activities, whether in the social, religious, or sports fields. The purpose of this study is to determine the results of legal self-promotion by notaries through social media. The research method used is normative juridical with a regulatory-statute approach and a conseptual approach. The results of the study revealed that the legal consequences for notaries who promote themselves through social media are only regulated in Article 6 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Notary Code of Ethics, the legal consequences of paragraph (1) include: Reprimand, Warning, Schorsing (temporary dismissal) from the Association, Onzetting (dismissal) from the Association, and Dishonorable Dismissal from the Association. Then, paragraph (2) states that sanctions imposed on members who violate the Code of Ethics are adjusted according to the quantity and quality of the violations committed. In conclusion, self-promotion by Notaries through social media is only regulated in Article 4 paragraph (3) of the Notary Code of Ethics. There is still ambiguity in Article 17 paragraph (1) letter i of the Notary Law, which only stipulates that Notaries are prohibited from engaging in other work that conflicts with religious norms, morality, or propriety that could affect the honor and dignity of the Notary position. However, it does not further regulate what work falls within the qualifications to affect the honor and dignity of the Notary position. This certainly creates legal uncertainty for Notaries.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PENCANTUMAN IDENTITAS ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN OLEH APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM Vito Sheridan Prayitno; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Sapti Prihatmini
Realism: Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v1i3.21

Abstract

Kerahasiaan identitas anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum ialah salah satu hak yang diberikan kepada anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum agar dapat menjaga nama baik anak karena anak masih memiliki hidup yang panjang dan merupakan pilar-pilar untuk memajukan bangsa Indonesia. Untuk melindungi hak anak tersebut negara telah menciptakan aturan yang melindungi hak dan juga kewajiban anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum Dalam prakteknya sendiri masih sering terdapat pencantuman identitas anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dalam putusan pengadilan yangmana hal ini tentunya tidak sesuai dengan aturan yang telah berlaku sehingga hal ini merugikan anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Terlebih ketika pengungkapan identitas anak yang berhadapan ini terdapat dalam putusan pengadilan sehingga pelaku dari pengungkapan identitas anak ini merupakan pejabat dalam struktural pengadilan dan merupakan aparat penegak hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normative dengan membawa pengaturan terkait kerahasiaan identitas anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum sehingga dapat dihasilkan pengkajian berkaitan dengan siapa yang bertanggungjawab terhadap penghitaman dan pengaburan informasi yang wajib dikaburkan dalam putusan pengadilan dan bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidananya.
Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Preventif bagi Notaris dan Para Pihak Siti Naimah; Rahmadi Indra Tektona; Fanny Tanuwijaya
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3445

Abstract

Notaris berwenang membuat akta autentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna sehingga harus memenuhi syarat formil dan materiil sesuai ketentuan hukum. Kelalaian dalam menjalankan jabatan dapat menyebabkan akta terdegradasi, batal demi hukum, atau dapat dibatalkan, serta menimbulkan tanggung jawab hukum bagi Notaris. Namun, dalam praktik masih terdapat Notaris yang digugat meskipun bukan pihak dalam akta. Kondisi ini dipengaruhi oleh kekaburan norma Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) yang belum memberikan parameter yang jelas mengenai frasa “bertindak saksama” sebagai dasar penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus melalui studi kepustakaan serta analisis deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa belum adanya standar yang terukur mengenai prinsip kehati-hatian menimbulkan multitafsir, ketidakseragaman penerapan, dan ketidakpastian hukum dalam praktik kenotariatan. Selain itu, penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian belum optimal sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa terhadap akta autentik serta tanggung jawab perdata, administratif, maupun pidana bagi Notaris. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan UUJN, khususnya melalui penyempurnaan Pasal 16 ayat (1) dengan memberikan penjelasan yang lebih komprehensif mengenai frasa “bertindak saksama” beserta parameter yang jelas dan terukur guna menjamin kepastian hukum, perlindungan preventif, dan profesionalitas Notaris.
Co-Authors Dinda Suryo Febyanti Echwan Iriyanto Fendi Setyawan Rahmadi Indra Tektona Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Sapti Prihatmini Siti Naimah Vito Sheridan Prayitno Wanda Eka Sri Masrita Yustisya Zaharon