Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Percepatan Pembangunan Jalan Tol Trans Sumatera Seksi Padang-Sicincin Lewat Pendekatan Holistik dan Legal dengan Perjanjian Izin Kompensasi Perubahan Bentuk Lahan Defi Adrian; Yusup Hidayat; Anas Lutfi
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 3 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Oktober 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i3.387

Abstract

Konflik pembangunan jalan tol Trans Sumatara seksi Padang-Sicincin telah berlarut larut serta menimbulkan permasalahan yang kompleks dan memakan waktu lebih dari 2 (dua) tahun. Penulis yang ditugaskan sebagai Project Manager dari pembangunan jalan tol ini lalu berdiskusi dan mencoba menemukan jalan tengah penyelesaian ini dengan melakukan metode systematic literature review untuk dapat membandingkan permasalahan sejenis pada negara lain. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan penyelesaian masalah akusisi lahan harus dilakukan dengan pendekatan sistematis dan mempertimbangkan aspek aspek seperti sosial, politik dan hukum secara holistik untuk dapat menemukan solusi yang mampu diterima semua pihak.
Efficiency of KPU and Bawaslu Regulations on Ad Hoc Agency Selection in the 2024 Election Process Muhammad Ali Husain; Suparji Suparji; Yusup Hidayat
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 11 (2024): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v5i11.1253

Abstract

Ad hoc organizers such as PPK, PPS, PPLN, KPPS, KPPSLN, Panwascam, PKD, Overseas Panwaslu, and TPS Supervisors are pioneers in the process of organizing elections in Indonesia. Therefore, the selection process carried out must be honest, fair, and independent to make ad hoc organizers professional and integrity. To create a professional election administration with integrity, regulations or guidelines are needed so that the ad hoc body has guidance in working so that the election administration carried out produces independent elections. The method in this writing is a qualitative descriptive method. The main data collection that the author uses in this article is a journal on Election Management. Article analysis uses analysis content. The result of this research informs us that in the ad hoc election body selection process, there are still several regulations issued by the KPU and BAWASLU that are still less efficient in the election ad hoc body selection process which results in the selected election organizers being less qualified. This article hoped to provide input on the process of holding elections in the following year.
Beyond Reception: A Critical Reassessment of Snouck Hurgronje and the Formation of Islamic Legal Historiography in the Nusantara Archipelago (14th–16th Centuries) Sariat Arifia; Yusup Hidayat; Bambang Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.9644

Abstract

The Receptie Theory formulated by Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje has long occupied a central position in the study of Islamic law in the Nusantara, often treated as an objective explanatory framework for the relationship between Islamic law and customary law. However, this dominance has generated a historiographical problem by obscuring the pre-colonial legal realities of the region. This study critically reassesses the Receptie Theory by situating it within the broader context of colonial knowledge production and legal governance, arguing that it functioned not merely as an academic proposition but as an epistemic instrument of colonial power aimed at subordinating Islamic law. Methodologically, the research employs an interdisciplinary approach that integrates Critical Legal Studies, Postcolonial Theory, and Indo-Archaeo-Islamology. The analysis is grounded in extensive field research conducted over five years across more than fifty cities in four countries. Thousands of archaeological artifacts—particularly Islamic tombstones and epigraphic inscriptions dating from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries—are examined and treated as primary legal-historical sources. The findings demonstrate that Islamic law had already operated as an autonomous, authoritative, and socially institutionalized legal system in the Nusantara well before the advent of European colonial rule. These empirical data directly challenge the foundational assumption of the Receptie Theory, which posits that Islamic law applied only to the extent that it was accepted by customary law. Instead, the evidence reveals a complex legal order in which Islamic norms functioned as positive law within political, social, and judicial structures. This study makes an academic contribution by deconstructing a long-standing colonial paradigm and reconstructing a more integrative historiography of Islamic law in the Nusantara. It advances postcolonial legal studies by offering an empirically grounded model for decolonizing Islamic legal historiography and re-centering indigenous Islamic legal agency in Southeast Asian history