Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Aulia, Muhammad Zulfa
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMUSATAN KEPEMILIKAN MEDIA MASSA DI INDONESIA: TINJAUAN ASPEK HUKUM Aulia, Muhammad Zulfa; Raffles, Raffles
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Today, mass media tend to be exclusively possessed by certain business groups who generally have affiliation to authorities or political parties. This article disscusses the concentration of mass media ownership in the light of constitutional and competition law. The article argues that the privatisation of business and politics towards public information through mass media, which is inevitable, has to be minimized. This due to the fact that mass media is one of pillars to which the democracy of a nation relies on. Despite the ownership of mass media which is a part of expressions (by some elites) of the people to performs such duties as the one guaranteed by the Constitution, the restriction of its ownership has to be attempted, since the business field uses limited public space to conduct business and perform democracy attached in it. In terms of the ownership of mass media centralizes among certain business holders, people have only few alternatives of information despite various media people might choose.
The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication: Penggunaan Frasa Hukum Progresif dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Konteks, Makna, dan Implikasi Aulia, Muhammad Zulfa; Hantoro, Bimo Fajar; Sanjaya, Wawan; Ali, Mahrus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2034

Abstract

As an influential legal idea, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law has colored various legal discourses and practices in Indonesia. Court decisions, as legal texts that record and summarize the trial process, also show that litigants, experts, and court judges often use this legal idea. This research will examine how progressive legal phrases are used in court decisions and whether the users have considered their underlying assumptions, pillars, or principles. This research is limited to Constitutional Court decisions in law review cases. The use of progressive legal phrases is generally accompanied by several progressive legal assumptions proposed by Satjipto Rahardjo. However, these are selected and used partially according to the needs and interests of their users, and thus can have bias implications when compared and examined comprehensively based on other assumptions or pillars.
Co-Authors Bimo Fajar Hantoro Mahrus Ali Raffles Raffles SANJAYA, WAWAN