Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Mohammad Novrizal
Faculty Of Law, University Of Indonesia, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PRAKTIK DEMOKRASI MODERN DALAM PEMERINTAHAN NAGARI DI MINANGKABAU Fitra Arsil; Mohammad Novrizal; Ryan Muthiara Wasti; Yunani Abiyoso; Ali Abdillah
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01503.8

Abstract

The adat governance of Minangkabau has adopted the democratic principles long before the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has such principles. This was due to the character of Minangkabau society and its culture which are inherited from their ancestors in Minangkabau society. This paper examines how forms of democratic practice in Minangkabau are related to democratic theory and the division of power. This normative legal research is supported by conducting interviews with some prominent adat figures in the Minangkabau society. In conclusion, it shows that the democratic principles in Nagari can exist until now because of the influence of adat figures. The adat figures preserve and combine such principles with religious norms as their indigenous values to be the main reference to run the Nagari.
Measuring the Reinstatement of the Closed Proportional System in Indonesia Dinaka, Burhan Robith; Bahar, Mohammad Novrizal
JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol 7, No 4 (2023): JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) (November)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jisip.v7i4.5624

Abstract

Menjelang perhelatan Pemilu 2024 ini, otak-atik dalam pemilihan sistem pemilu di Indonesia kembali mencuat. Perdebatan tersebut setidaknya selalu terjadi dalam setiap perhelatan menjelang pesta demokrasi tersebut. Sistem pemilu adalah sebuah cara untuk menerapkan dan memberi kebebasan seluas-luasnya kepada setiap warga negara untuk menggunakan hak pilihnya memilih wakil rakyat yang dikehendaki. Sejak pemilu pertama kali dilaksanakan pada tahun 1955 lalu, peneliti melihat jika sistem pemilu proporsional adalah sistem yang paling cocok untuk diterapkan di Indonesia, terlepas dari perdebatan model sistem pemilu proporsional terbuka atau tertutup. Tulisan ini akan mengkaji sebuah pilihan sistem pemilu proporsional terbuka atau tertutup yang digunakan di Indonesia pada Pemilu 2024 mendatang. Dengan pendekatan kajian hukum normatif, tulisan ini juga menyuguhkan perbandingan kelebihan dan kekurangan sistem proporsional daftar terbuka atau tertutup.
Strengthening the Constitutional Court’s Authority to Adjudicate on Disputes Regarding the Result of Regional Head Election In Indonesia: an Urgency to Clarify the Constitutional Framework Rayhan Naufaldi Hidayat; Mohammad - Novrizal
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4022

Abstract

Since the Constitutional Court is the guardian of democracy and the constitution, it is responsible for ensuring that elections in Indonesia are held in a democratic manner. The power rotation process must be carried out calmly and collectedly, without any significant breaches of people's fundamental rights or acts of violence. The instrument of authority is a necessary component for the Constitutional Court to achieve all of the goals stated in the text. The functioning of the Constitutional Court's authority to resolve disputes relating to the outcomes of Indonesia's regional head elections will be further examined in this research. Then, in order to determine the necessary treatments, a worldwide comparison of the increasing symptoms with those of other countries will be carried out. The research methodology used is doctrinal legal study using a comparative constitutional research strategy. The findings demonstrated the weakness of the Constitutional Court's authority to resolve disputes over the outcomes of regional head elections. It was observed that there were three distinct interpretations of the norms that formed the basis for legitimacy, which resulted in progressive changes to this authority. The Republic of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution's ambiguous normative framework for regional head elections has led to ongoing interpretations It is really unique in light of the fact that the constitutions of 43 of 72 unitary nations in the world fully regulate election procedures and the course of dispute settlement in the event of a dispute. In fact, they specifically mention in one or more of the Constitutional Court's complete authority articles the nature of authority and the scope of elections. It is imperative to promptly establish the precedent with clear legal politics declaring that regional head elections are elections in order to guarantee that the Constitutional Court hears the majority of cases.
Co-Authors Ali Abdillah Dinaka, Burhan Robith Fitra Arsil Rayhan Naufaldi Hidayat Ryan Muthiara Wasti Yunani Abiyoso