Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : MLJ Merdeka Law Journal

Implikasi Yuridis terhadap Calon Independen dalam Pilkada menurut Undang-Undang Tentang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Andi Ahmad Mappasiling; Supriyadi Supriyadi
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.6239

Abstract

This legal research is based on the focus of the problem regarding the Juridical Basis of Independent Candidates in the Regional Head General Election System (Pilkada) and the Legal Implications Faced by Independent Candidates in the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) based on the Law on Regional Head Elections. This research includes normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The conclusion of this study, the juridical basis behind individual candidates in the Pilkada is the Constitutional Court Decision No. 5/PUU-V/2007. The success of individual candidates in participating in regional head elections cannot be separated from the role played by Lalu Ranggalawe, a member of the DPRD in Central Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara who conducted a judicial review of the Constitutional Court. The Legal Implications Faced by Independent Candidates in the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) is the frequent occurrence of difficulties that make prospective candidates from individual candidates fail, especially those of an administrative nature. In addition to the requirements for candidacy which are difficult to fulfill, namely a number of supports from voters, there is also a provision that all support must be factuated by using the census method by meeting directly with each candidate's supporters.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i1.6239
Kedudukan Program Subsidi Bahan Bakar Minyak dan Penghapusannya dalam Perspektif Teori Negara Kesejahteraan Petrus Pidi Seda; Supriyadi Supriyadi; Samsul Wahidin
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November 2020 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v2i1.5533

Abstract

Indonesia is a country that adopts the concept of a welfare state. The welfare state refers to the role of the government which is responsible for managing and organizing the people's economy. The state is expected to be able to carry out its responsibility to ensure the availability of basic rights welfare services for its citizens. The provision of subsidies is a government program to ensure the welfare of the people. The research objective is to examine the position of the subsidy program from the perspective of the welfare state and the elimination of fuel subsidies by the government as a welfare state. This research is normative legal research, which deals with the policy of eliminating fuel subsidies from the perspective of the welfare state. The approach used is statutory and conceptual. In a legal concept, the position of the subsidy policy is to help improve people's welfare. The removal of fuel subsidies is a government action that is following the concept of the welfare state because the use of BBM is not included in the basic needs of the community which must be subsidized or intervened by the government.AbstraksIndonesia merupakan negara yang menganut konsep negara kesejahteraan. Negara kesejahteraan mengacu pada peran pemerintah yang bertanggungjawab dalam mengelola dan mengorganisasikan perekonomian masyarakat. Negara diharapkan mampu menjalankan tanggung jawabnya untuk menjamin ketersediaan pelayanan kesejahteraan hak-hak dasar bagi warganya. Pemberian subsidi merupakan program pemerintah untuk menjamin kesejahteraan rakyat. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengkaji kedudukan program subsidi dalam perspektif negara kesejahteraan, dan penghapusan subsidi BBM oleh pemerintah sebagai negara kesejahteraan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, yang berhubungan dengan kebijakan penghapusan subsidi BBM dalam perspektif negara kesejahteraan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Secara konsep hukum, kedudukan kebijakan subsidi untuk membantu meningkatkan kesejahteraan rakyat. Penghapusan subsidi BBM merupakan tindakan pemerintah yang telah sesuai dengan konsep negara kesejahteraan karena penggunaan BBM tidak termasuk dalam kebutuhan dasar masyarakat yang harus disubsidi atau diintervensi oleh pemerintah. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i2.5533 
Penerapan Sanksi Denda Tilang Elektronik Traffic Law Enforcement (E-TLE): Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan Anjar Rudi Admoko; Supriyadi Supriyadi
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2022): November 2022 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v3i2.9220

Abstract

This study aims to examine several things, namely the imposition of fines and obstacles in the application of Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (E-TLE) fines in the Sura-baya City area and solutions in overcoming obstacles in the application of Electronic Traffic Law Enforce-ment (E-TLE) tickets to traffic violators in the Surabaya City area. The type of research used is the legal research method. The results showed that the application of E-tickets, the application of fines for electronic traffic law enforcement (E-TLE) tickets went smoothly. The number of violations encountered in the field during the process is motorcycle drivers not wearing helmets, violating markings, and violating speed limits. The solutions carried out in overcoming the obstacles that occur during the implementation of the electronic ticketing system are: a) Increase the number of CCTV installations on a number of roads in Surabaya City, b) Expand the socialization of electronic ticketing, and c) Reduce the name transfer fee.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v3i2.9220 
Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 dalam Perkara Narkotika Pasca Pandemi (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen Kabupaten Malang) Asma F; Supriyadi Supriyadi
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2023): May 2023 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/mlj.v4i1.11400

Abstract

Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 aims to guarantee the right of the accused to obtain prompt legal certainty for the criminal offence alleged to him through trial without undue delay. After the Covid-19 pandemic, how did Perma's execution take place in Kepanjen State Court. The issues in this study include: how the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 in the case of post-pandemic narcotic drugs covid-19 and whether the obstacles to the application of the Rules of the High Court No. The method used in this research is empirical jurisprudence, i.e. primary data or data obtained directly from the research site as well as secondary data that comes from legislative regulations and books. The results of the study revealed that the State Court for the Post-Covid-19 pandemic in conducting the trial is still being conducted online due to difficulties in presenting the accused. So the most effective thing to do is an online trial. There are rules on the legality of electronic proceedings through the Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 on Administrative and Criminal Proceedings in Electronic Courts.