Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.679
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Multidisciplinary Research Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Referendum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Agustinus Hedewata
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial

 1 
Kewenangan Berhak dan Kewenangan Bertindak Menurut Hukum Perdata Suatu Kajian Normatif Sebastianus Nong Mario Zakaria; Agustinus Hedewata; Yossie M. Y. Jacob
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1751

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the concepts of entitled authority and acting authority in civil law as well as the relevance and implications of regulating entitled authority and acting authority in civil law practice. The type of research used by the author is Normative Law research, the type of data used in this research is qualitative data. The data used in research is based on the relevance of the source data, namely primary and secondary data. The results of this research are that the results of the research show that Rightful Authority is defined as the authority of an individual or a legal entity to carry out a legal act in a community's social life which is considered valid because it constitutes his or her essence as a human being or individual or as a legal entity while the Authority to Act is defined as Special authority. The special authority referred to is authority that only applies to certain people and for certain legal actions, whereas the relevance and implications show that there is no relevance in regulating the authority to have rights and the authority to act in civil law. This is shown by cases that frequently occur. for example, early marriage.
Analisis Yuridis Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Berdasarkan Putusan Perkara Perdata Nomor: 13/Pdt.G/2021/Pn End Maria Angelica Dei Nai; Agustinus Hedewata; Husni Kusuma Dinata
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1755

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the juridical ownership of customary land rights based on the decision of civil case Number: 13/Pdt.G/2021/Pn End. The type of research used by the author is Normative Legal research. The sources of legal materials used in this research are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The method of processing legal materials through 4 (four) stages, namely identification of legal materials, inventory of legal materials, verification of legal materials and interpretation of legal materials which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Based on the research results, the Plaintiff was unable to prove that the disputed object was his property and vice versa the Defendants were unable to prove that the disputed object was customary land belonging to the Kila Da Tribe. This is because there are inconsistencies regarding the structure, hierarchy, and mechanism of worship in the Customary Law Community that differ in the evidence of the Plaintiff and the Defendants. The Plaintiffs and Defendants were also unable to prove recognition by executive agencies regarding ownership of the disputed object. In addition, the Plaintiff was unable to prove that he was a legitimate heir as stipulated in Article 832 of the Civil Code. Likewise, the Defendants were unable to prove that they were the legitimate heirs of Kila Da from Wednesday Kila's descendants. The author argues that the consideration of the Panel of Judges in giving a decision in this case was correct, by rejecting the Plaintiff's claim in its entirety. Because all the arguments of the lawsuit regarding ownership of rights to customary land, cannot be proven by the Plaintiff.
Co-Authors Alvintho Tiumlafu Ana Maria Clarisa Dhiu Sawi Cornelia Selan Darius Mauritsius Dicky Kolodikson Selan Dio Afriyanto Minta Helsina Fransiska Pello Heribertus Virgi Golot Husni Kusuma Dinata Ignasius Lawe Makin Lidia Anjelina Laos Margaretha Adeyanti Manek Maria Angelica Dei Nai Maria Grezhella Rihi Maria Oktafiani Wona Ledun Miftahul Chair Nono, Carolin P. Orpa J Nubatonis Orpa J. Nubatonis Orpa Juliana Nubatonis Petornius Damat Petronela Haba Manu Romualdo Erlangga B Kosad Putra Rona Pili Mangngi Rustam Soewandi Sebastianus Nong Mario Zakaria Sukardan Aloysius Toumeluk, Dean Monica Yossie Maria Yulianti Jacob