Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum The Republic: Journal of Constitutional Law Doh Gisin Syattar; Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum dan Pendidikan
La Syarifuddin
Universitas Mulawarman
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Law Enforcement Against The Crime Of Human Trafficking At Line Two, Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong Rahman Risanto; La Syarifuddin; Rini Apriyani
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/ay.v1i2.8628

Abstract

Indonesia has provided a legal basis for the criminal conduct of human trafficking  in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Crime of Human Trafficking. The disclosure of the case of human trafficking at the coffee shop pangku on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong which was carried out directly by the Tenggarong Sebrang police found one of the practices of human trafficking under the guise of a coffee shop, on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong. Even though the stalls have been brought under control several times, in reality these stalls are quickly operating again. So it can be seen that law enforcement against the crime of human trafficking under the guise of a coffee shop on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong has not been fully running well. The purpose of this study is to determine the enforcement of criminal law against perpetrators of criminal conducts of human trafficking in the Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong. The two authors want to know the efforts that have been made by the government to overcome the practice of human trafficking in Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong. Based on the collection of legal data, the authors get answers regarding law enforcement against the perpetrators of the criminal conduct of human trafficking in Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong, only 1 case was carried out in 2018 against the defendant Wiwik Julianto with an underage victim, in which the defendant was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment. Apart from this case, law enforcement has not been carried out against the perpetrators of the criminal conduct of human trafficking at the coffee shop on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong by the Tenggarong Seberang sector police on the grounds that they have not found strong evidence of the existence of human trafficking in the form of prostitution, although they also admit that there are many and still active prostitution activities in the coffee shop. The government's efforts against the practice of human trafficking in the Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong, efforts by the Satpol PP of Kutai Kartanegara Regency were hampered by field conditions which were indeed protected by community organizations that protected coffee shops on the Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong and the unpleasant treatment by shopkeepers. The shop is a threat to the safety of its officers. Legal efforts made by the Tenggarong Seberang Police are only limited to data collection, raids on alcohol and arrests traffickers in the form of prostitution only if they receive a report
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM TERHADAP UPAYA PENYELESAIAN PERKARA BERDASARKAN HUKUM ADAT La Syarifuddin
SYATTAR Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penyelesaian perkara berdasarkan hukum adat sebagai alternatif pilihan dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara diluar pengadian. Keberadaannya merupakan legitimasi dari nilai-nilai yang lahir dari masyarakat Indonesia yang hingga sekarang masih konsisten dipertahankan dibanyak komunitas. Secara hukum telah diakui dan dihormati terhadap kesatuan-kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya termasuk peradilan dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara baik pidana maupun perdata yang ada dan dimiliki oleh masyarakat hukum adat.
CRIMINALIZATION OF COHABITATION UNDER INDONESIA’S 2023 CRIMINAL CODE: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE Ridha Islamika; La Syarifuddin; Orin Gusta Andini
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i1.6895

Abstract

Cohabitation, defined as unmarried couples living together, has recently been criminalized under Article 412 of Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code. This policy reflects the state’s intention to regulate moral conduct and protect social values within society. However, the criminalization of private conduct raises important questions regarding its effectiveness and efficiency, particularly when assessed through a law and economics perspective. This study aims to analyze the criminalization of cohabitation under the 2023 Criminal Code using a cost-benefit analysis framework and to examine its legal consequences within the broader legal system. The research employs a doctrinal legal method, supported by a conceptual approach grounded in law and economics theory. The findings indicate that, from a cost-benefit perspective, the criminalization of cohabitation offers potential benefits, including the protection of social norms, moral values, and the institution of family, as well as the prevention of related social problems. However, these benefits are accompanied by significant costs, such as increased burdens on the criminal justice system, higher state expenditures, and potential socio-economic repercussions. Furthermore, as an absolute complaint offense, the enforcement of Article 412 depends on reports from specific parties, which may limit its practical effectiveness. At the systemic level, this provision also risks creating legal disharmony with existing regulations, including marriage and child protection laws. In conclusion, the criminalization of cohabitation in Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code reflects a normative commitment to moral regulation but raises concerns regarding its efficiency and coherence within the broader legal framework.Keywords: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cohabitation; Criminalization; Law and Economics; Indonesian Criminal Code
GESTURE PROGRESIF BANGUNAN SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA M Fauzi; Musthafa; La Syarifuddin
The Republic : Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): THE REPUBLIC : Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/htn.v3i2.2252

Abstract

Legal challenges arise as society continues to evolve, necessitating rules to guide people's actions and serve as the basis for decision-making by law enforcement. Progressive law operates in the realm of ideas and advocacy to make law more beneficial to humanity thru a legal system that is liberating, conscientious, and utilizes spiritual intelligence in serving law to humanity. This goal seems inconsistent with legal positivism, which is the general pattern for the structure of written legal systems in modern countries. The study results indicate that some joints of the Indonesian legal system have gestures that can be used to progressively move the existing legal system. Based on Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, Indonesia is a state of law with a tendency toward the rule of law that prioritizes justice over legal certainty based on written law. The gap between societal norms and dynamics can be filled either thru responsive legislation or thru the progressive legal discovery by judges. Judges are obliged to explore, follow, and understand the legal values and sense of justice that exist within society. The development of judicial review of legislative products in the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court also shows a shift in perspective from merely textual thinking toward a more progressive legal way of thinking. The task of enforcing and upholding the law is one that requires seriousness and steadfastness against temptation, so what is needed is a good societal culture and law enforcement resources in order for the legal system to improve.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST ACTORS INVOLVED IN THE SELLING OF IMPORTED SECONDHAND CLOTHING (THRIFTING) IN SAMARINDA CITY Fahrul Rozy; La Syarifuddin; Amsari Damanik
JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES Vol. 4 No. 01 (2026): FEBRUARY 2026
Publisher : Media Inovasi Pendidikan dan Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The phenomenon of importing used clothes or thrifting has grown rapidly in Samarinda City, in accordance with Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 40 of 2022 which prohibits the import of used clothes. This study aims to analyze effective criminal law enforcement strategies for sellers of imported used clothes who have transformed into digital entrepreneurs with increasingly sophisticated modus operandi. The results of the study show that the majority of business actors operate without adequate permits, creating an economic paradox in which these activities contribute positively to the community's economy but are detrimental to the rule of law and economic justice. Law enforcement faces obstacles in coordination between agencies. This study recommends a holistic and progressive law enforcement strategy through tripartite coordination between the Police, Customs and Excise, and the Trade Office that not only focuses on repressive law enforcement but also education, coaching, and developing a digital surveillance system to anticipate the innovation of the modus operandi of thrifting business actors in the future.
Pertimbangan Anak sebagai Saksi Mahkota (Kroongetuige) dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika La Syarifuddin; M. Fauzi; Musthafa Musthafa
Doh Gisin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Kesetaraan Gender dan Perlindungan Anak Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/dohgisin.3038

Abstract

Anak sebagai saksi dalam perkara pidana telah diakui secara sah dalam KUHAP. Namun, menurut pembentuk Undang-Undang, keterangan mereka tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara sempurna dalam hukum pidana. Oleh karena itu, mereka tidak dapat diambil sumpah atau janji dalam memberikan keterangan; keterangan mereka hanya dipakai sebagai petunjuk atau tambahan alat bukti sah lainnya, atau untuk menambah keyakinan hakim. Kemudian, kehadiran anak sebagai saksi mahkota dalam perkara pidana narkotika wajib mendapat perlindungan yang tidak dapat dilepaskan dari konteks hukum perlindungan terhadap anak. Hukum, yang merupakan kaidah tertinggi, harus diikuti oleh masyarakat dalam melakukan interaksi sosial, serta oleh penguasa negara sebagai penyelenggara kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat.
Co-Authors Amsari Damanik Fahrul Rozy M Fauzi M. Fauzi Musthafa Musthafa Musthafa Orin Gusta Andini Rahman Risanto Ridha Islamika Rini Apriyani