Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Law Enforcement Against The Crime Of Human Trafficking At Line Two, Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong Rahman Risanto; La Syarifuddin; Rini Apriyani
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/ay.v1i2.8628

Abstract

Indonesia has provided a legal basis for the criminal conduct of human trafficking  in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Crime of Human Trafficking. The disclosure of the case of human trafficking at the coffee shop pangku on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong which was carried out directly by the Tenggarong Sebrang police found one of the practices of human trafficking under the guise of a coffee shop, on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong. Even though the stalls have been brought under control several times, in reality these stalls are quickly operating again. So it can be seen that law enforcement against the crime of human trafficking under the guise of a coffee shop on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong has not been fully running well. The purpose of this study is to determine the enforcement of criminal law against perpetrators of criminal conducts of human trafficking in the Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong. The two authors want to know the efforts that have been made by the government to overcome the practice of human trafficking in Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong. Based on the collection of legal data, the authors get answers regarding law enforcement against the perpetrators of the criminal conduct of human trafficking in Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong, only 1 case was carried out in 2018 against the defendant Wiwik Julianto with an underage victim, in which the defendant was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment. Apart from this case, law enforcement has not been carried out against the perpetrators of the criminal conduct of human trafficking at the coffee shop on Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong by the Tenggarong Seberang sector police on the grounds that they have not found strong evidence of the existence of human trafficking in the form of prostitution, although they also admit that there are many and still active prostitution activities in the coffee shop. The government's efforts against the practice of human trafficking in the Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong, efforts by the Satpol PP of Kutai Kartanegara Regency were hampered by field conditions which were indeed protected by community organizations that protected coffee shops on the Line Two Poros Samarinda-Tenggarong and the unpleasant treatment by shopkeepers. The shop is a threat to the safety of its officers. Legal efforts made by the Tenggarong Seberang Police are only limited to data collection, raids on alcohol and arrests traffickers in the form of prostitution only if they receive a report
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM TERHADAP UPAYA PENYELESAIAN PERKARA BERDASARKAN HUKUM ADAT La Syarifuddin
SYATTAR Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penyelesaian perkara berdasarkan hukum adat sebagai alternatif pilihan dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara diluar pengadian. Keberadaannya merupakan legitimasi dari nilai-nilai yang lahir dari masyarakat Indonesia yang hingga sekarang masih konsisten dipertahankan dibanyak komunitas. Secara hukum telah diakui dan dihormati terhadap kesatuan-kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya termasuk peradilan dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara baik pidana maupun perdata yang ada dan dimiliki oleh masyarakat hukum adat.
CRIMINALIZATION OF COHABITATION UNDER INDONESIA’S 2023 CRIMINAL CODE: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE Ridha Islamika; La Syarifuddin; Orin Gusta Andini
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i1.6895

Abstract

Cohabitation, defined as unmarried couples living together, has recently been criminalized under Article 412 of Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code. This policy reflects the state’s intention to regulate moral conduct and protect social values within society. However, the criminalization of private conduct raises important questions regarding its effectiveness and efficiency, particularly when assessed through a law and economics perspective. This study aims to analyze the criminalization of cohabitation under the 2023 Criminal Code using a cost-benefit analysis framework and to examine its legal consequences within the broader legal system. The research employs a doctrinal legal method, supported by a conceptual approach grounded in law and economics theory. The findings indicate that, from a cost-benefit perspective, the criminalization of cohabitation offers potential benefits, including the protection of social norms, moral values, and the institution of family, as well as the prevention of related social problems. However, these benefits are accompanied by significant costs, such as increased burdens on the criminal justice system, higher state expenditures, and potential socio-economic repercussions. Furthermore, as an absolute complaint offense, the enforcement of Article 412 depends on reports from specific parties, which may limit its practical effectiveness. At the systemic level, this provision also risks creating legal disharmony with existing regulations, including marriage and child protection laws. In conclusion, the criminalization of cohabitation in Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code reflects a normative commitment to moral regulation but raises concerns regarding its efficiency and coherence within the broader legal framework.Keywords: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cohabitation; Criminalization; Law and Economics; Indonesian Criminal Code
GESTURE PROGRESIF BANGUNAN SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA M Fauzi; Musthafa; La Syarifuddin
The Republic : Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): THE REPUBLIC : Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/htn.v3i2.2252

Abstract

Legal challenges arise as society continues to evolve, necessitating rules to guide people's actions and serve as the basis for decision-making by law enforcement. Progressive law operates in the realm of ideas and advocacy to make law more beneficial to humanity thru a legal system that is liberating, conscientious, and utilizes spiritual intelligence in serving law to humanity. This goal seems inconsistent with legal positivism, which is the general pattern for the structure of written legal systems in modern countries. The study results indicate that some joints of the Indonesian legal system have gestures that can be used to progressively move the existing legal system. Based on Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, Indonesia is a state of law with a tendency toward the rule of law that prioritizes justice over legal certainty based on written law. The gap between societal norms and dynamics can be filled either thru responsive legislation or thru the progressive legal discovery by judges. Judges are obliged to explore, follow, and understand the legal values and sense of justice that exist within society. The development of judicial review of legislative products in the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court also shows a shift in perspective from merely textual thinking toward a more progressive legal way of thinking. The task of enforcing and upholding the law is one that requires seriousness and steadfastness against temptation, so what is needed is a good societal culture and law enforcement resources in order for the legal system to improve.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST ACTORS INVOLVED IN THE SELLING OF IMPORTED SECONDHAND CLOTHING (THRIFTING) IN SAMARINDA CITY Fahrul Rozy; La Syarifuddin; Amsari Damanik
JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES Vol. 4 No. 01 (2026): FEBRUARY 2026
Publisher : Media Inovasi Pendidikan dan Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The phenomenon of importing used clothes or thrifting has grown rapidly in Samarinda City, in accordance with Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 40 of 2022 which prohibits the import of used clothes. This study aims to analyze effective criminal law enforcement strategies for sellers of imported used clothes who have transformed into digital entrepreneurs with increasingly sophisticated modus operandi. The results of the study show that the majority of business actors operate without adequate permits, creating an economic paradox in which these activities contribute positively to the community's economy but are detrimental to the rule of law and economic justice. Law enforcement faces obstacles in coordination between agencies. This study recommends a holistic and progressive law enforcement strategy through tripartite coordination between the Police, Customs and Excise, and the Trade Office that not only focuses on repressive law enforcement but also education, coaching, and developing a digital surveillance system to anticipate the innovation of the modus operandi of thrifting business actors in the future.
Pertimbangan Anak sebagai Saksi Mahkota (Kroongetuige) dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika La Syarifuddin; M. Fauzi; Musthafa Musthafa
Doh Gisin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Kesetaraan Gender dan Perlindungan Anak Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/dohgisin.3038

Abstract

Anak sebagai saksi dalam perkara pidana telah diakui secara sah dalam KUHAP. Namun, menurut pembentuk Undang-Undang, keterangan mereka tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara sempurna dalam hukum pidana. Oleh karena itu, mereka tidak dapat diambil sumpah atau janji dalam memberikan keterangan; keterangan mereka hanya dipakai sebagai petunjuk atau tambahan alat bukti sah lainnya, atau untuk menambah keyakinan hakim. Kemudian, kehadiran anak sebagai saksi mahkota dalam perkara pidana narkotika wajib mendapat perlindungan yang tidak dapat dilepaskan dari konteks hukum perlindungan terhadap anak. Hukum, yang merupakan kaidah tertinggi, harus diikuti oleh masyarakat dalam melakukan interaksi sosial, serta oleh penguasa negara sebagai penyelenggara kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana dengan Disabilitas Mental atau Intelektual Mery Maryati; Rosmini Rosmini; La Syarifuddin
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6740

Abstract

This research examines criminal liability concerning offenders who are suspected of experiencing mental disorders. The focus of the research is directed toward the mechanism for determining the mental condition of offenders and its implications for deciding whether the offender can be held criminally responsible, as regulated under Article 44 of the Indonesian Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 39 of Law Number 1 of 2023. As a study employing a doctrinal legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the findings indicate that within the evidentiary mechanism, particularly regarding the issuance of medical certificates as evidence, such documents are used to assist judges in assessing the offender’s capacity for criminal responsibility. However, at the level of legal implementation, inconsistencies remain due to the absence of clear and detailed regulations concerning the classification of mental disabilities/intellectual disabilities in relation to criminal liability as referred to in Article 44 of the Indonesian Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 39 of Law Number 1 of 2023. Consequently, the determination of whether a person can be held criminally responsible tends to depend on case-by-case assessments, thereby creating the potential for legal uncertainty.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Atas Pencurian Saldo Pulsa Berbasis Aplikasi Digital (Studi Putusan Nomor 9/PID.SUS/2021/PN.PLI) Yasmine Noor Fadhilla; La Syarifuddin; Sulung Nugroho
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 10: September 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i10.20305

Abstract

Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi yang semakin luas tidak hanya memberikan manfaat bagi masyarakat, tetapi juga membuka peluang munculnya berbagai bentuk kejahatan di ruang siber. Salah satu bentuk kejahatan tersebut adalah pengurangan saldo pulsa melalui aplikasi digital yang dilakukan dengan cara mengakses sistem elektronik secara tidak sah. Perbuatan ini menyebabkan kerugian bagi pengguna karena saldo yang dimiliki berkurang tanpa persetujuan maupun kewenangan yang sah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku pencurian saldo pulsa berbasis aplikasi digital serta mengidentifikasi kesesuaian sanksi pidana yang dijatuhkan dalam Putusan Nomor 9/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pli dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan pendekatan normatif yang berfokus pada pengkajian peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan berbagai sumber kepustakaan yang relevan. Sumber bahan hukum terdiri atas bahan hukum primer berupa Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik serta Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, jurnal ilmiah, serta karya tulis yang berkaitan dengan kejahatan siber. Seluruh bahan hukum tersebut dianalisis untuk mengkaji aspek pertanggungjawaban pidana, pertimbangan hukum hakim, serta proporsionalitas sanksi pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada pelaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pencurian saldo pulsa berbasis aplikasi digital lebih tepat dikualifikasikan sebagai kejahatan terhadap sistem elektronik berdasarkan UU ITE karena dilakukan melalui akses tanpa hak, penyalahgunaan sistem, dan manipulasi data elektronik. Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku dapat dibebankan karena terpenuhinya unsur kemampuan bertanggung jawab, kesalahan dalam bentuk kesengajaan, hubungan kausal antara perbuatan dan akibat, serta tidak adanya alasan penghapus pidana. Sanksi pidana yang dijatuhkan dalam Putusan Nomor 9/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pli pada prinsipnya telah sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam UU ITE, namun argumentasi hukum mengenai pidana kurungan sebagai pengganti denda belum dijelaskan secara memadai sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum.