Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Priviet Social Sciences Journal Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ius Comparatum: Journal of Law Studies
Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro
Universitas Jember
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Transhumanistic cybercrime analysis using a posthuman criminology approach to digital identity threats in artificial intelligence era Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro; Muhammad Kuttub Firdausy
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i9.558

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence has disrupted conventional legal assumptions about identity, subjectivity, and criminal responsibility. This study investigated the normative and systemic inadequacies of Indonesia’s legal system in responding to transhumanistic cybercrime, particularly involving the manipulation of digital identities. Employing a normative juridical method and incorporating statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study critically analyzes structural, substantive, and cultural inertia within the legal framework. Drawing on Lawrence Friedman’s legal system theory and post-human criminology, this study identifies a deep ontological crisis wherein non-human actors and synthetic identities remain legally unrecognized. A comparative analysis of the European Union, the United States, Estonia, and Japan illustrates the varying degrees of legal adaptation, from algorithmic accountability to digital identity sovereignty. The findings reveal that Indonesia lacks a coherent legal regime to address algorithm-driven harm or recognize digital identity as an autonomous legal subject. The study proposes legal reforms that include establishing a dedicated legal framework for digital identity protection, extending criminal liability to autonomous systems, and integrating post-human perspectives into legal education. In the age of algorithmic governance, law must transcend biological essentialism to remain legitimate, responsive, and just.
Pluralisme Hukum dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Gastrokolonialisme yang Menggerus Identitas Budaya Masyarakat Adat Firdausi Nuzula Rahmadani; Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Desember-Februari
Publisher : Samudra Ilmu Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dalam beberapa dekade terakhir, gastrokolonialisme, penetrasi makanan yang diproduksi secara industri dan sangat diproses ke dalam sistem pangan adat, telah mengubah pola makan, ekonomi, dan hubungan hukum di Indonesia. Makalah ini mengkaji bagaimana pluralisme hukum dapat menahan rezim makanan gastrokolonialisme dan menilai dampak kebijakan food estate yang dipimpin negara terhadap kedaulatan adat dan kesehatan masyarakat. Menggunakan desain metode campuran, studi ini menggabungkan analisis hukum doktrinal terhadap undang-undang dan yurisprudensi Indonesia, tinjauan kebijakan instrumen perkebunan pangan dan peraturan presiden, sintesis empiris statistik nutrisi dan penggunaan lahan, serta studi kasus lapangan komparatif di Merauke dan Dogiyai. Temuan mengungkapkan pergeseran yang dipercepat dari makanan lokal yang beragam menuju produk olahan, peningkatan terukur dalam indikator yang terkait dengan beban ganda malnutrisi dan penyakit tidak menular, serta kesenjangan yang persisten antara perlindungan konstitusional untuk hak-hak adat dan praktik di lapangan, terutama implementasi Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) yang lemah, prioritas administratif untuk alokasi lahan berskala besar, dan pengakuan yang tidak memadai terhadap hak ulayat. Kerangka teoretis yang mengacu pada Vandana Shiva menekankan kedaulatan benih, kritik ekofeminisme terhadap monokultur, dan kewajiban moral untuk melindungi keanekaragaman hayati serta pengetahuan komunitas. Pluralisme hukum dapat menyelaraskan hukum agraria, kehutanan, dan pangan dengan norma-norma adat hanya jika langkah-langkah perlindungan prosedural dapat ditegakkan (pendaftaran partisipatif, FPIC yang mengikat, metrik dampak yang sensitif secara budaya) dan upaya untuk mengatasi kerugian non-ekonomi diinstitusionalisasi. studi merekomendasikan integrasi indikator kesehatan dan keanekaragaman hayati ke dalam perizinan dan penilaian dampak, pengakuan yuridis dan pendaftaran hak ulayat masyarakat adat, serta pendanaan terarah untuk alternatif agroekologis yang dipimpin oleh komunitas agar pengembangan kawasan pangan mendukung (bukan merusak) kedaulatan masyarakat adat, kesehatan masyarakat, dan ketahanan ekologi.
Constitutional Question dan Constitutional Complaint: Pembaharuan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Terjaminnya Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro; Syedna Ahmad Albanna; Antikowati Antikowati; Igam Arya Wada
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): AL-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.5030

Abstract

The constitutional rights of citizens are the main rights that should be protected and guaranteed by the state. However, in practice, there are still several violations of the constitutional rights of citizens in Indonesia, for example in the process of making legal products, namely laws and regulations, which do not include participation from citizens and the increasingly narrowing of citizens' right to freedom in expressing their suggestions and input in public. . Seeing the problems above, researchers try to provide recommendations by internalizing adjudicating Constitutional Question and Constitutional Complaint cases as one of the powers of the Constitutional Court. This research is very important as a basis for state officials in guaranteeing the constitutional rights of citizens in the future. This research uses normative legal methods and a statutory approach. The data collection method was carried out using library research. The results of the research found legal facts that the concepts of Constitutional Question and Constitutional Complaint had not yet been adopted as part of the authority of the Constitutional Court and found several dynamics of violations of citizens' constitutional rights. In practice, the Constitutional Court only has the authority to hear and decide cases where the applicant feels disadvantaged by the existence of the law, not by state officials. Researchers recommend synergies in increasing the accessibility of public services for handling Constitutional Court cases online as well as the implementation of adjudicating Constitutional Question and Constitutional Complaint cases in Indonesia.
Judicial Preview: Pembaharuan Prosedur Verifikasi Konstitusionalitas Sebagai Wujud Harmonisasi Nilai Kepastian dan Keadilan Hukum Syedna Ahmad Albanna; Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro; Budi Indra Cahaya; Alejandro Yudhas Rangga Putra; Moh. Affan Ghaffar Shafarida
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): AL-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.5271

Abstract

The Indonesian legal system is still confronted with the antinomy between the values of legal certainty and justice. This can be seen from the numerous laws that have been annulled by the Constitutional Court (MK) due to their inconsistency with the constitution. This research aims to analyze the urgency of implementing the concept of Judicial Preview in Indonesia as a solution to the antinomy between the values of legal certainty and justice in the formation of legislation. This research uses a normative legal method and is conducted through conceptual and legal approaches. Through a legal approach, it is intended to analyze the problem of the high number of annulled laws by the Constitutional Court. This research also utilizes secondary data, such as laws. The data collection method is carried out through a literature study process that examines literature materials, such as scientific journals, books, and online websites. The research results indicate that Judicial Preview, as a mechanism for testing laws before enactment, can be a solution to prevent laws that are inconsistent with the constitution. Judicial Preview can provide legal certainty to the public that enacted laws will not violate their constitutional rights. Additionally, Judicial Preview can also help realize legal justice. The implementation of the Judicial Preview concept in Indonesia can be an effective solution to address the antinomy between the values of legal certainty and justice in the formation of legislation. By implementing Judicial Preview, it is hoped that higher quality laws, in line with constitutional values, can be created, providing legal certainty and justice for society.
Intersection Between Administrative Freies Ermessen and Maladministration in Strategic Nickel Industrial Area Development in Morowali Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro; Muhammad Fadirah Fauzi
Journal of Ius Comparatum Law Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Justice in The Legal System
Publisher : Faculty of Law |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/icjls.v1i2.12028

Abstract

The development of the nickel industrial zone in Morowali Regency reflects a critical intersection between administrative discretion (freies Ermessen) and the growing risks of maladministration. While the project, primarily through the Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park (IMIP), contributes significantly to national economic growth and global energy transition, its implementation often circumvents legal and ethical governance frameworks. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to examine the legal boundaries of administrative discretion within strategic national projects. Findings reveal that discretion has been exploited to accelerate permits, land acquisition, and fiscal incentives without sufficient public participation, transparency, or legal compliance. Such practices have led to environmental degradation, agrarian conflicts, and diminished public trust in government institutions. Key indicators of maladministration include abuse of authority, discriminatory policies favoring large corporations, procedural violations, and the absence of effective oversight mechanisms. The research underlines that discretion, when detached from its foundational legal and moral principles, transforms into a tool of unchecked bureaucratic power, undermining good governance and democratic values. It argues for stricter regulatory oversight, clearer discretionary boundaries, and participatory frameworks to prevent misuse in future development agendas. Ultimately, the paper contributes to advancing administrative law discourse by emphasizing the urgent need for institutional reforms to align discretionary practices with the principles of accountability, legality, and public interest in state administration.
Implementasi Green Bond dalam Sektor Investasi Infrastruktur di Indonesia Guna Mewujudkan Sustainable Economic Development Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro; Alfin Dwi Novemyanto
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): October : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v2i4.1191

Abstract

Indonesia faces significant challenges in achieving sustainable development, particularly due to the negative environmental impacts of rapid economic growth, such as deforestation, air and water pollution, and the increase in greenhouse gas emissions. Green Bonds have great potential as a financial instrument to promote sustainable development in Indonesia. Indonesia is actively working to develop the market through key policies such as the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No. 51/POJK.03/2017, which regulates the issuance and offering of sustainable bonds, thus enhancing the suitability of green bonds to finance environmentally friendly projects. The research method used in this study is a normative legal approach with a focus on laws and regulations (UU) and a library research method. Through this approach, the study analyzes relevant regulations and existing literature to explore the potential and challenges Indonesia faces in implementing green bonds, particularly in the infrastructure investment sector. The implementation of green bond investments in Indonesia, especially in the infrastructure sector, is a strategic step in line with efforts to achieve sustainable development. To achieve this, Indonesia must also consider integrating green bonds into broader development policies. This includes developing strategies that combine economic, social, and environmental aspects in the planning and implementation of infrastructure projects.
Co-Authors Alejandro Yudhas Rangga Putra Alfin Dwi Novemyanto Antikowati Antikowati Budi Indra Cahaya Firdausi Nuzula Rahmadani Moh. Affan Ghaffar Shafarida Muhammad Fadirah Fauzi Muhammad Kuttub Firdausy Syedna Ahmad Albanna Wada, Igam Arya