Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An-natiq: Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Jurnal Restorasi Hukum
M. Natsir Asnawi
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Strategi Advokasi Bagi Korban KDRT Dalam Memperjuangkan Hak Asus Anak Pasca Perceraian Azima Amalia; Bella Asri Pratiwi; Maskana Qurrota Ayyun; M.Ravi Al-Muntashir; M. Natsir Asnawi; Wagianto
An Natiq Vol 6 No 1 (2026): An Natiq
Publisher : Institute for Islamic Studies and Aswaja (LPIK) of Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/an-natiq.v6i1.25155

Abstract

Divorce resulting from domestic violence (KDRT) raises complex legal issues in determining child custody (hadhanah), particularly when normative legal provisions intersect with the need to ensure effective protection for both children and victims of violence. In the practice of Religious Courts, custody decisions are not solely based on textual legal provisions but also take into account the child's safety, welfare, and best interests. This article aims to analyze the normative construction of child custody following divorce caused by domestic violence from the perspective of Islamic Family Law and to formulate advocacy strategies that strengthen the substantive protection of children's custodial rights. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through a library-based examination of legislation, the Compilation of Islamic Law, Religious Court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that although custody of children who have not yet reached the age of discernment (mumayyiz) is generally granted to the mother, judges may depart from this principle in cases involving domestic violence when such a decision is necessary to ensure the child's safety and best interests. The study further finds that effective advocacy requires strengthening legal arguments based on victim protection, comprehensive evidence of the impact of domestic violence on children, and the consistent application of the best interests of the child principle. Therefore, the principles of best interests of the child and maslahah al-thifl should serve as the primary foundation for hadhanah decisions. The harmonization of Islamic law and Indonesian positive law provides a stronger framework for protecting both children and victims of domestic violence while promoting substantive justice in child custody disputes.
Model Advokasi Istri dalam Ketimpangan Relasi Perspektif Maqashid dan Feminist Legal Theory Cahya Alifya Nazwa; Suaidah; Dodi Ferdiansyah; M. Natsir Asnawi
Jurnal Restorasi Hukum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Restorasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/9jns1m54

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tingginya angka kekerasan terhadap istri di Indonesia yang mencapai 83,7% berdasarkan data CATAHU Komnas Perempuan 2024, yang menunjukan adanya kesenjangan antara teks hokum nurmatif dengan realitas perlindungan praksis. Meskipun instrument hukum seperti UU PKDRT dan KHI telah tersedia, istri tetap berada dalam posisi rentan akibat hambatan structural yang sistemik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor penyebab kegagalan perlindungan tersebut dan merumuskan model advokasi hukum yag ideal bagi istri dalam ketimpangan relasi. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan maqashid al-syariah dan Feminist Legal Theory, Kajian ini menemukan bahwa kegagalan perlindungan dipicu oleh tekanan budaya patriarki yang mengakar, rendahnya literasi hukum, keterbatasan lembaga layanan, serta bias aparat penegak hokum. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa advokasi hukum berperan sebagai instrumen transformatif melalui pendampingan komprehensif yang memanfaatkan PERMA No. 3 Tahun 2017 untuk memitigasi bias yudisial . Sebagai kontribusi konseptual, penelitian ini merumuskan Model Advokasi Integratif Maqāṣid-Feminis yang bersifat holistik, berperspektif gender, dan berakar pada nilai kemaslahatan Islam . Model ini menekankan pentingnya perubahan sistemik melalui pembentukan lembaga penagih nafkah nasional guna memastikan putusan pengadilan memberikan keadilan substantif yang nyata bagi perempuan.
Co-Authors Azima Amalia Bella Asri Pratiwi Cahya Alifya Nazwa Dodi Ferdiansyah M.Ravi Al-Muntashir Maskana Qurrota Ayyun Suaidah Wagianto