Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENDAMPINGAN BIMBINGAN BELAJAR UNTUK MENUMBUHKAN MOTIVASI PADA SISWA DI TPQ NURUL WATHAN DESA TRIWUNGAN KABUPATEN PROBOLINGGO Juhairiyah Juhairiyah; Purwaning Putri; Mariatul Kiftiah Wasilah; Yahmun Yahmun; Susandi Susandi; Ike Dian Puspita Sari
JPM PAMBUDI Vol 7 No 02 (2023): JPM Pambudi
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (P2M) IKIP Budi Utomo Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33503/pambudi.v7i02.3339

Abstract

Community Service which is one of the ways or efforts to implement the tri dharma of higher education. This is done with the aim of fostering student motivation and interest in the learning provided by the teacher. The learning assistance methods that are applied to students at TPQ Wathan, include; students and students carry out learning and teaching procedures directly. This tutoring assistance is carried out at TPQ Wathan, Triwungan Village, Probolinggo Regency, the material provided and taught by the teacher in tutoring assistance is desired by students The target object in the tutoring assistance research is students at the elementary level grades 1-6.
Forensic Linguistic Analysis of Critical Speech in the Haris Azhar & Fatia Video: Between Freedom of Expression and Defamation Munawwir Hadiwijaya; Yahmun Yahmun
Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy
Publisher : UIBU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33503/journey.v8i1.1874

Abstract

This article examines the speech delivered in a YouTube video by Haris Azhar and Fatia Maulidiyanti, which led to a defamation lawsuit filed by a high-ranking Indonesian official. Using a forensic linguistic approach, the study investigates whether the utterances constitute defamatory speech or protected public criticism. A descriptive qualitative method is employed to analyze the lexical, syntactic, pragmatic, and discourse-level features of the video. The analysis identifies three categories of speech—false factual claims, critical opinions, and data-driven statements—and finds that the utterances fall primarily within the latter two, characterized by cautious language such as “allegedly” and “according to reports.” These linguistic mitigations indicate a lack of intent to defame and reflect research-based criticism. The study concludes that the speech acts, from a forensic linguistic perspective, do not fulfill the criteria for criminal defamation, but rather exemplify constitutionally protected freedom of expression.