Abdurrahman
Universitas Al-Qolam Malang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Analysis of Al-Miftah and Al-Jurumiyah Methods in Accelerating Arabic Literacy Acquisition: A Study on Turath Reading Skills Zulfan Syahansyah; Abdurrahman; Naser Ali Abdulghani
Attractive : Innovative Education Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Attractive : Innovative Education Journal
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/aj.v7i3.1752

Abstract

The low level of Turath literacy caused by the complexity of classical grammar necessitates effective methodological innovations for novice learners. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Al-Miftah method and the Nahwu Putih Al-Jurumiyah scheme in enhancing the ability to read kitab kuning (classical Islamic texts). Utilizing a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design, the research was conducted at Pondok Pesantren Raudlatul Ulum 1 through purposive sampling. Data analysis using the Independent Sample T-Test and Repeated Measures ANOVA revealed that Al-Miftah is significantly superior in terms of comprehension speed and functional reading fluency. Conversely, the Nahwu Putih Al-Jurumiyah method contributes more significantly to the accuracy of I’rab (grammatical parsing) and demonstrates more stable long-term memory retention consistency (with a decline of only 5.0% compared to 12.0% for Al-Miftah). These findings substantiate a trade-off between cognitive speed and analytical depth. The impact of this research provides a new framework for Islamic educational institutions to integrate both methods, creating an accelerated Arabic literacy system that is both agile and precise for contemporary learners.
Konsep Evaluasi Pembelajaran Menurut Surah Ali Imran Ayat 200 (Studi Pemikiran Al-Ghazali dalam Ihya Ulumuddin) Abdurrahman
Jurnal test Vol 3 No 2 (2024): September
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58363/alfahmu.v3i2.196

Abstract

Verse 200 of Ali Imran's letter, although it does not explicitly mention assessment as Learning (AaL), is interpreted by Al-Ghazali in Ihya Ulumuddin (IU) as a murabathah system that includes six phases. This paper aims to confirm this interpretation with various general theories about the latest AaL challenges, and to build a construction of the interpretation of Al-Ghazali's AaL concept. The method used is library research with a content analysis approach, de-contextualization, and re-contextualization analysis techniques, as well as basic inductive techniques. Research findings state that Al-Ghazali's interpretation of AaL is in line with the latest AaL theory, such as AaL based on SRL (self-regulation of learning), especially based on co-regulation of learning with four main phases: forethought, planning and activation, monitoring, control, reaction, and reflection. Apart from that, it is also in line with formative and summative evaluation theories, as well as theories about feedback. In the area section, AaL Al-Ghazali's interpretation is in line with the areas of cognition, motivation/affect, behavior, and context. This research also succeeded in developing the construction of Al-Ghazali's AaL system which consists of: musyarathah, muraqabah, muhasabah, mu’aqabah, mujahadah and mu’atabah into concrete form.