Naser Ali Abdulghani
University of Benghazi, Libya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Childfree in the Perspective of Islamic Feminism: A Comparative Study of the Thoughts of K.H. Husein Muhammad, Amina Wadud, and Fatima Mernissi Moch Aufal Hadliq Khaiyyul Millati Waddin; Naser Ali Abdulghani
Santara: Journal of Islamic Law and Humanity Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Islamic Law and Humanity
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Tarbiyah Islam, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59373/santara.v1i2.209

Abstract

The childfree phenomenon among contemporary Muslims has sparked theological and social debate, highlighting the tension between the normative construction of motherhood in Islam and women's growing awareness of their bodily authority and social roles. This study aims to analyze and compare the responses of three Islamic feminist figures, K.H. Husein Muhammad, Amina Wadud, and Fatima Mernissi, to the childfree issue. The method used is a qualitative approach through literature study and comparative-critical discourse analysis. The results show that although their approaches differ, namely maqāṣidiyah (Husein Muhammad), textual hermeneutics (Amina Wadud), and historical-sociological criticism (Fatima Mernissi), all recognize women's right to autonomy over their bodies and reproductive decisions. Husein Muhammad emphasizes the aspect of maslahah within the framework of sharia, Wadud highlights spiritual justice and mutual benefit, while Mernissi views the childfree phenomenon as a form of resistance to the patriarchal narrative of motherhood. This article contributes to broadening the horizons of contemporary Muslim women through a synthesis of women's, theological, and sociological approaches to the discourse on Muslim women's reproductive rights.
Comparative Analysis of Al-Miftah and Al-Jurumiyah Methods in Accelerating Arabic Literacy Acquisition: A Study on Turath Reading Skills Zulfan Syahansyah; Abdurrahman; Naser Ali Abdulghani
Attractive : Innovative Education Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Attractive : Innovative Education Journal
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/aj.v7i3.1752

Abstract

The low level of Turath literacy caused by the complexity of classical grammar necessitates effective methodological innovations for novice learners. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Al-Miftah method and the Nahwu Putih Al-Jurumiyah scheme in enhancing the ability to read kitab kuning (classical Islamic texts). Utilizing a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design, the research was conducted at Pondok Pesantren Raudlatul Ulum 1 through purposive sampling. Data analysis using the Independent Sample T-Test and Repeated Measures ANOVA revealed that Al-Miftah is significantly superior in terms of comprehension speed and functional reading fluency. Conversely, the Nahwu Putih Al-Jurumiyah method contributes more significantly to the accuracy of I’rab (grammatical parsing) and demonstrates more stable long-term memory retention consistency (with a decline of only 5.0% compared to 12.0% for Al-Miftah). These findings substantiate a trade-off between cognitive speed and analytical depth. The impact of this research provides a new framework for Islamic educational institutions to integrate both methods, creating an accelerated Arabic literacy system that is both agile and precise for contemporary learners.