Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Childfree in the Perspective of Islamic Feminism: A Comparative Study of the Thoughts of K.H. Husein Muhammad, Amina Wadud, and Fatima Mernissi Moch Aufal Hadliq Khaiyyul Millati Waddin; Naser Ali Abdulghani
Santara: Journal of Islamic Law and Humanity Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Islamic Law and Humanity
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Tarbiyah Islam, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59373/santara.v1i2.209

Abstract

The childfree phenomenon among contemporary Muslims has sparked theological and social debate, highlighting the tension between the normative construction of motherhood in Islam and women's growing awareness of their bodily authority and social roles. This study aims to analyze and compare the responses of three Islamic feminist figures, K.H. Husein Muhammad, Amina Wadud, and Fatima Mernissi, to the childfree issue. The method used is a qualitative approach through literature study and comparative-critical discourse analysis. The results show that although their approaches differ, namely maqāṣidiyah (Husein Muhammad), textual hermeneutics (Amina Wadud), and historical-sociological criticism (Fatima Mernissi), all recognize women's right to autonomy over their bodies and reproductive decisions. Husein Muhammad emphasizes the aspect of maslahah within the framework of sharia, Wadud highlights spiritual justice and mutual benefit, while Mernissi views the childfree phenomenon as a form of resistance to the patriarchal narrative of motherhood. This article contributes to broadening the horizons of contemporary Muslim women through a synthesis of women's, theological, and sociological approaches to the discourse on Muslim women's reproductive rights.
Comparative Analysis of Al-Miftah and Al-Jurumiyah Methods in Accelerating Arabic Literacy Acquisition: A Study on Turath Reading Skills Zulfan Syahansyah; Abdurrahman; Naser Ali Abdulghani
Attractive : Innovative Education Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Attractive : Innovative Education Journal
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/aj.v7i3.1752

Abstract

The low level of Turath literacy caused by the complexity of classical grammar necessitates effective methodological innovations for novice learners. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Al-Miftah method and the Nahwu Putih Al-Jurumiyah scheme in enhancing the ability to read kitab kuning (classical Islamic texts). Utilizing a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design, the research was conducted at Pondok Pesantren Raudlatul Ulum 1 through purposive sampling. Data analysis using the Independent Sample T-Test and Repeated Measures ANOVA revealed that Al-Miftah is significantly superior in terms of comprehension speed and functional reading fluency. Conversely, the Nahwu Putih Al-Jurumiyah method contributes more significantly to the accuracy of I’rab (grammatical parsing) and demonstrates more stable long-term memory retention consistency (with a decline of only 5.0% compared to 12.0% for Al-Miftah). These findings substantiate a trade-off between cognitive speed and analytical depth. The impact of this research provides a new framework for Islamic educational institutions to integrate both methods, creating an accelerated Arabic literacy system that is both agile and precise for contemporary learners.
Inter-Islamic Law Simulation in Education as an Effort to Build a Community Legal Culture Naser Ali Abdulghani; Sarkanto; Wahyudin Khairul Sya'ban
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i1.607

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the implications of inter-law simulation in education on the formation of a community's legal culture. The writing method used is normative juridical research with a conceptual and sociological approach, supported by a literature study of laws and regulations, legal theories, and relevant scientific literature. The results of the study show that inter-law simulation in education is able to increase students' legal awareness through direct experience in applying legal norms, social, Islamic legal values and cultural values contextually. This approach not only strengthens cognitive legal understanding, but also forms sustainable law-abiding attitudes and behaviors, thus contributing significantly to strengthening the legal culture of society.
Geography, space and education in the qur'anic story of moses: A hermeneutical perspective Safa Alrumayh; Nahid Ayad; Abraheem Alriteemi; Mohieddin Masoud; Mowafg Masuwd; Sami Barkah; Naser Ali Abdulghani; Husna Nashihin
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 4 No. 4 Oktober 2025: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v4i4.481

Abstract

This study explores the role of spatiality in the Qur’anic narrative of Prophet Moses, examining six central locations, Egypt, the river, the palace, Midian, the sea, and Mount Ṭur as transformative stages in the prophetic journey.  Drawing upon classical Qur’anic exegesis and Gadamerian hermeneutics, the research employs a textual-analytical approach to explore how each place functions not merely as a geographical site but as a locus of divine pedagogy and existential formation. The study addresses a gap in Qur’anic studies and educational philosophy by highlighting how spatial interpretation reveals the pedagogical dimensions of prophetic experience and the construction of spiritual identity. Through this lens, the paper contributes to developing a Qur’anic philosophy of sacred space and deepens understanding of divine education in the Qur’anic worldview.
ULTIMUM REMEDIUM AND THE LEGAL POLITICS OF TAX CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IN INDONESIA Arridho Abduh; Irma Romi Anto; Naser Ali Abdulghani
Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Almatani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/jkih.v4i2.1700

Abstract

The enforcement of tax criminal law in Indonesia faces a structural dilemma between the principle of ultimum remedium, which emphasizes the recovery of state financial losses, and the tendency to apply primum remedium, which is punitive. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a statutory, conceptual, case-based, and comparative approach to analyze the normative construction of the KUP Law, law enforcement practices, and Supreme Court jurisprudence related to tax crimes. The results show that the ambiguity of the discretionary formulation of Article 44B of the KUP Law, as well as the inconsistency of the ratio decidendi in court decisions, have given rise to legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of taxpayers. As a novelty, this article deconstructs the binary paradigm of ultimum remedium–primum remedium and proposes the Integrative Justice Model as an alternative theoretical framework. This model is designed as a legal triage mechanism that classifies tax crimes based on the level of seriousness of the act and the degree of culpability (mens rea) of the perpetrator, thus allowing for proportional differentiation of settlement paths through: (1) administrative-restorative paths, (2) hybrid restorative-punitive paths, and (3) punitive-preventive paths. The Integrative Justice Model is offered as a normative solution to bridge the interests of state financial restoration with just, effective, and legal certainty-oriented criminal law enforcement.