Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.147
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal AKAL: Abdimas dan Kearifan Lokal terAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Jun Justinar
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENENTUAN STATUS PENGUNGSI DAN PENERAPAN PRINSIP NON-REFOULEMENT DI JERMAN, AUSTRALIA DAN KANADA Jun Justinar
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 9 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v9i1.16638

Abstract

Prinsip non-refoulement merupakan 'landasan', 'pusat' atau 'pokok' dari perlindungan mendasar bagi pengungsi. Prinsip ini terdapat dalam Pasal 33 (1) Konvensi Pengungsi 1951 yang melarang Negara Pihak mengusir atau mengembalikan pengungsi dengan cara apapun ke perbatasan wilayah yang mengakibatkan kehidupan atau kebebasannya akan terancam karena alsan ras, agama, kebangsaan, keanggotaan dari kelompok sosial tertentu. atau opini politiknya. Prinsip non-refoulement merupakan satu-satunya jaminan bahwa pengungsi tidak akan mengalami penganiayaan hingga ia mengungsi sampai memasuki wilayah negara lain. Seseorang harus menjadi pengungsi terlebih dahulu, atau setidaknya menjadi pencari suaka untuk mendapatkan keuntungan dari ketentuan non-refoulement. Penentuan status pengungsi perlu ditetapkan agar seseorang yang mengklaim status pengungsi dan telah terbukti memenuhi kriteria pengungsi segera mendapat jaminan tidak akan mengalami pengusiran. Tulisan ini merupakan bagian dari disertasi berdasarkan penelitian yang menggunakan data sekunder dengan memaksimalkan kajian pustaka. Data yang terkumpul disampaikan secara deskriptif dengan hasil analisis data yang disimpulkan secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penetapan status penting bagi pengungsi agar terpenuhi haknya untuk dilindungi dari pengusiran sesuai dengan prinsip non-refoulement. Penentuan status pengungsi di Jerman dilakukan oleh Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge/Federal Office of Migration and Refugee sedangkan di Australia dilaksanakan oeh Department of Home Affairs; dan di Kanada ditetapkan Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. Penerapan prinsip non-refoulement di Jerman dilakukan berdasarkan Asylum Act and Residence Act dan Asylgesetz [Asylg] [Asylum Act], sementara di Australia berdasarkan Migration Act 1958 dan Immigration Act 1976, sedangkan di Kanada berdasarkan Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Constitution Act 1982 dan Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
PRINSIP NON-REFOULEMENT DALAMPERLINDUNGAN PENGUNGSI DI INDONESIA(BERDASARKAN KASUS PENGUNGSI ETNISROHINGYA DI INDONESIA KARENA KONFLIKRASIAL DI MYANMAR: Principles of non-refoulement in the Protection of Refugees in Indonesia (Based on the Case of Refugees of Rohingya Ethnic  in Indonesia Due To Racial Conflict in Myanmar) Wawo, Arnoldus Jansen Julian; Justinar, Jun
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/wxp6v860

Abstract

Rohingya refugees need humanitarian assistance and have the right to protection from arbitrary return to places where they are at risk of torture. This rule is known as the principle of non-refoulement, which is understood as the basis for international protection for refugees. This thesis results from normative legal research using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection was carried out through literature study and interviews. The issues discussed are: how the principle of non-refoulementis regulated in national law in Indonesia, what is Indonesia's attitude in dealing with Rohingya refugees who have come to seek refugee in Indonesia, and why the principle of non-refoulement is still weak in its implementation in Indonesia. The results of this thesis research show that the principle of non- refoulement is regulated in Indonesia through Constituion of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Article 28G, Act No.1 1979,Act No.5 1998, Act No.29 1999, Act No.37 1999, Act No.6 2011, People'sConsultative Assembly Decision No.17 1998, President Ordinance No.125 2016, Directorate General of Imigration Ordinance No.IMI-1489 2010, Government Ordinance No.31 2013. Even though Indonesia'sfirm stance was demonstrated by not ratifying the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Indonesia still adheres to the principle of non-refoulement. The implementation of the non-refoulement principle inIndonesia is still weak because Indonesia itself has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Additional Protocol.
PENANGANAN PENGUNGSI ROHINGYA DI INDONESIA: HANDLING  OF  ROHINGYA REFUGEES  IN INDONESIA Mylova, Rezha Willy Putra; Naufal, Muhammad; Justinar, Jun
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Mei 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/3vwk3q35

Abstract

Indonesia, as an archipelagic country with a Muslim majority population, has received Rohingya refugees in recent years. This article highlights Indonesia's response to the Rohingya humanitarian crisis, focusing on refugee policies and practices at the national level. This research is a normative legal research that includes research on legal principles with descriptive narratives. This research uses secondary and primary data as its main sources to support the findings. A comparative analysis will compare Indonesia's approach with other countries in the region, such as Malaysia and Thailand. The study shows that the three countries have not yet become parties to the 1951 Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, so the handling of Rohingya refugees in the three countries is handed over to the UNHCR. Thailand and Malaysia often detain refugees because they are illegal migrants. Indonesia, in handling Rohingya refugees, depends on assistance from donations from international organizations and other countries. This does not provide a long-term solution, so a comprehensive approach is needed in handling Rohingya refugees in Indonesia. The principle of non-refoulement binds all countries even if they are not parties to the 1951 Convention because this principle has become customary international law with a jus cogens character.
PERLINDUNGAN PEKERJA MIGRAN ILEGAL INDONESIA KORBAN PERDAGANGAN ORANG DI MALAYSIA MENURUT PROTOKOL PALERMO TAHUN 2000: Protection of Indonesian Illegal Migrant Workers Victims of Trafficking in Malaysia According to the Palermo Protocol of 2000 Aura Ratrika; Jun Justinar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19478

Abstract

Human trafficking has been a crime that has existed for a long time. In the present era, human trafficking in Indonesia involves illegal migrant workers moving to other countries without proper documentation. The Indonesian government has ratified the Palermo Protocol as a commitment to combat human trafficking. The issues addressed in this research are the obligations of Indonesia as a signatory to the Palermo Protocol of 2000 and the efforts made by the Indonesian government to prevent and protect Indonesian migrant workers who become victims of human trafficking in Malaysia. This study is a normative research using secondary data. The data is analyzed qualitatively and concluded using deductive methods. Based on the research findings and analysis, it is evident that Indonesia's obligations as a signatory to the Palermo Protocol of 2000 include taking legislative. The Indonesian government protects Indonesian migrant workers who are victims of human trafficking by keeping the victims' identities confidential, providing restitution to the victims, rehabilitating them, offering legal assistance, ensuring social reintegration, and assisting in the repatriation of victims. The conclusion is Indonesia has fulfilled the obligations ordered the 2000 Palermo Protocol by making a number of efforts to prevent and protect illegal Indonesian migrant workers.
- Tanggung Jawab Afganistan Berdasarkan Hukum Humaniter Internasional Dalam Melindungi Anak-anak Korban Konflik Bersenjata: - Yolanda Kartika Aditya; Jun Justinar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i2.19809

Abstract

Since World War II children have been forcibly engaged as prisoners of war and child soldiers. The armed conflict in Afghanistan is a non-international armed conflict between Taliban insurgent forces and the Afghan Government within the Afghan state. The violations that occurred were torture and murder of children, suicide attacks using improvised devices, attacks using landmines, and sexual violence against children. Children as civilians are protected under the 1949 Geneva Convention IV. The formulation of the problem is how Afghanistan's responsibility for the protection of children in the armed conflict in Afghanistan according to international humanitarian law. This research is a normative juridical research, utilizing secondary data sources, conducting qualitative analysis by drawing conclusions by inductive reasoning. The results show that Afghanistan's responsibility for the protection of children is to cooperate with several international organizations to provide donations for a decent life to these children, and provide full protection when children are made prisoners of war. The conclusion of the Afghan government's responsibility for the conflict is to protect civil society and provide compensation to the victims.
Co-Authors Ade Khatibul Rafi Aura Ratrika Maya Notoprayitno Muhammad Naufal, Muhammad Mylova, Rezha Willy Putra Notoprayitno, Maya Patrecia, Audrey Putri Permanasari, Arlina Putri, Denyssa Jasmine Ardiansyah Surya, Muhammad Falih Nasywaan Uli, Cena Lucia Wawo, Arnoldus Jansen Julian Winna Ellianne Yolanda Kartika Aditya Zulfa, Aninda Aulia