Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Relationship between the Adherence Level of the use of Scientific Herbal Medicine and Its Success in Hypertension Therapy Anggita Rahmawati; Truly Anggraini; Novena Yety Lindawati
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 6 No S6 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v6iS6.4368

Abstract

Hypertension has the most significant prevalence among non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Indonesia. The prevalence of hypertension in 2018 of 34.11% rose 8.31% from the prevalence of hypertension in 2013 of 25.8%. Data from the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia indicates that 32.3% of hypertension patients exhibit non-compliance or do not regularly adhere to medication regimens, thereby increasing their mortality risk. The objective of this study was to establish the magnitude of the impact caused by the compliance level to the use of antihypertensive scientific herbal medicines on the effectiveness of hypertensive patients’ therapy in UPF. Yankestrad Rs Dr. Sardjito Tawangmangu. This study descriptively utilized a quantitative cross-sectional method using the MARS-5 (Medication Adherence Report Scale) questionnaire to measure adherence level. The sample of this study consisted of 150 purposively hypertensive respondents out of the total sample size of the 150 who conducted the research in October 2023. Data analysis includes univariate and bivariate analysis with a chi-square test. The research findings provide a reliable understanding of compliance levels. A very low compliance level was recorded at 32 or 21.3%, a moderate compliance level was recorded at 53 or 35.3% and a high compliance level was recorded at 65 or 43.4%. The chi-square supported the association thus out of 113 respondents the p-value at 0.001 and where the relationship can be a very healthy therapy at UPF Yankestrad Dr. Sardjito Tawangmangu Hospital.
Evaluation of the Rationality of Antibiotic Use in Child Diarrhea Patients in the Inpatient Care Installation Truly Anggraini; Retnowati Adiningsih; Khoirun Nisa Logarithm
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v7i4.6440

Abstract

According to WHO and UNICEF, diarrheal disease occurs around 2 million cases and 1.9 million children die each year with a prevalence of 78% in developing countries. The treatment used is antibiotics. Irrational use of antibiotics can cause less effective treatment, decreased drug safety levels, high treatment costs and increased resistance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rationality of antibiotic use in pediatric diarrhea patients at UNS Hospital using the Gyssens method for the period January - September 2023. This study was conducted as an observational study with a descriptive design with retrospective sampling, the sample of this study was 80 patients and included in the inclusion category of 33 samples, then a descriptive analysis was carried out using the Gyssens assessment. The reference used is the Indian guidelines Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) 2022, DIH, MIMS, and UNS Hospital Drug Formulary. Data collection began with observation of medical records of pediatric diarrhea patients at UNS Hospital. The research data was obtained from UNS Hospital medical records for the period January - September 2023, then analyzed using the Gyssens method which was categorized as 0 - 6 descriptively and presented in the form of a percentage.This study shows the results of the rationality of antibiotics for pediatric diarrhea patients in the inpatient department of UNS Hospital using the Gyssens method for the period January - September 2023 proving that 71.73% of patients received rational antibiotic therapy (category 0), as many as 28.27% of patients received irrational antibiotic therapy including 10.87% category IVC, namely there are cheaper alternatives, 6.53% category IIIB, namely the duration of antibiotic use is too short, 10.87% category IIB, namely the interval of antibiotic administration is not appropriate.