Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Lukman Hakim Harahap
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Teknologi Sidik Jari dalam Sistem Hukum: Tinjauan terhadap Prinsip – Prinsip Pembuktian Lukman Hakim Harahap; Daiyatul Mardiah; Dinda Sherin Al Asya Sinaga; Raihan Ryanta Akbar; Sri Anggini Lubis
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat  Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v4i5.3489

Abstract

The application of fingerprint technology in the legal system has brought significant changes to the evidentiary process. This technology enables the identification of individuals with high accuracy, which is an important element in law enforcement and dispute resolution. This study explores how fingerprint technology is applied in the Indonesian legal context, reviews relevant evidentiary principles, and analyzes the implications of its use in various legal cases. This research is descriptive analytical, meaning that this research aims to describe certain circumstances or situations of the objects or events being studied without intending to draw conclusions that can be applied generally. The approach used in this research is the normative juridical method. The results show that, although fingerprint technology makes a significant contribution to the effectiveness of evidentiary systems, fingerprint technology has long been used in the legal system as a tool for individual identification. Fingerprints, with their unique characteristics in each person, provide a guarantee of highly accurate identification. This technology is not only used in crime but also in various aspects of government and public services, such as population registration and securing access. The application of fingerprint technology in a modern legal context is becoming increasingly relevant with advances in digital technology that enable fast and efficient data processing. There are challenges related to privacy, data reliability and the integrity of legal processes. This research also proposes recommendations to increase the integration of fingerprint technology in the legal system in accordance with the principles of justice and human rights.
Tinjauan Fiqh Jinayah terhadap Sistem Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Malaysia Fauzan Habibi Lubis; Noor Azizah; Lukman Hakim Harahap
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei: Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i2.2474

Abstract

The crime of corruption manifests a pathological excretion of endemic crime and methodically destroys the foundations of state governance integrity and the teleological equilibrium of social justice holistically. The two jurisdictions between Indonesia and Malaysia are entangled in substantial epistemo-procedural complexity in the process of constructing evidence of corruption cases, crossing both from the positive legal dimension and the register of judicial ethics. This comparative study investigates the divergence and convergence trajectories that color the epistems of proof of corruption in both countries, with an analytical concentration focused on the doctrine of burden of proof inversion. By deploying a juridical-normative paradigm strengthened through comparative legal hermeneutics, the results of the study indicate that although Indonesia and Malaysia both implement a reversal mechanism of the burden of proof, the two countries exhibit striking heterogeneity in the procedural intensity and normative restrictions imposed. Malaysia prioritizes a balance between the effectiveness of institutional law enforcement and the prerogative of fundamental rights, while Indonesia shows a more aggressive vector in prosecuting disproportionately unexplained accumulated assets. Islamic criminal law strengthens the imperative of law enforcement through the postulates of substantive justice and the absolute prohibition of the practice of risywah. At its core, the effectiveness of proving corruption requires the availability of an architecturally adaptive legal system, a law enforcement apparatus with unparalleled integrity, and an ethical framework sublimated from the principles of universal justice.
Co-Authors Daiyatul Mardiah Dinda Sherin Al Asya Sinaga Fauzan Habibi Lubis Noor Azizah Raihan Ryanta Akbar Sri Anggini Lubis