Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Mahalini: Journal of Business Law Studia: Journal of Humanities and Education Studies
Aqil Tajuddin Zhahir
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisa Pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pembatasan Transaksi Uang Kartal Aqil Tajuddin Zhahir; Ariesta Chandra Perdana; Claudia Theresia Sihotang; Muhammad Galih Sampurno
Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Aktivisme : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aktivisme.v1i3.338

Abstract

The Bill on the Limitation of Cartal Money Transactions (RUU PTUK) is a regulation regarding the limitation of cartal money transactions to 100 million rupiah in a day either in one transaction or several times, more than that must use digital money. The purpose of this bill is to reduce circulation and emphasize counterfeit money and reduce corruption activities. This paper aims to identify the problems and impacts of the passage of the PTUK Bill on corruption and money politics in Indonesia. The PTUK Bill in its application requires public participation to support the PTUK Bill, besides that the public needs to understand the consequences of money politics on the sustainability of government.
Perbandingan Pengampuan Negara Indonesia dengan Negara Singapura Aqil Tajuddin Zhahir; Danar Aji Kirana; Alfiyan Rahmat dani Utomo; Wisnu Hesa
Mahalini: Journal of Business Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Mahalini: Journal of Business Law
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/mjbl.v1i1.11081

Abstract

This article examines the differences in guardianship, or curatele, between Indonesia and Singapore. The objective is to identify the types and distinctions of guardianship in these two countries. The research is descriptive in nature, with legal materials collected through a literature study using primary and secondary sources. The findings reveal that there are indeed differences between Indonesia and Singapore. In Indonesia, an individual under guardianship is referred to as a Kurandus, which includes those who are mute, mentally ill, or have impaired vision. The Guardian, or curator, typically has rights and duties as determined by the Court at the time of their appointment. In contrast, in Singapore, a person under guardianship is known as a donor, and this is not limited to individuals who are mentally incapacitated; even those who are mentally sound can become donors. Additionally, there are two types of Guardians in Singapore: Donees and Deputies, both of whom have the right and obligation to make decisions on behalf of the donor. 
Analisis Kepastian Hukum Joint Operation Agreement sebagai Perjanjian Innominate yang Disamakan dengan Firma dalam Putusan Nomor 01 K/N/1999 Aqil Tajuddin Zhahir; Danar Aji Kirana; Radithya Fathan Al Gibran; Rayi Kharisma Rajib
Studia : Journal of Humanities and Education Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): August: Studia: Journal of Humanities and Education Studies
Publisher : CV Edukastra Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66749/k4em4s10

Abstract

Joint Operation Agreement berkembang sebagai model kerja sama usaha yang banyak digunakan dalam praktik bisnis nasional meskipun belum diatur secara tegas dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Perjanjian ini dikualifikasikan sebagai perjanjian innominate yang lahir dari asas kebebasan berkontrak dan kebutuhan dunia usaha terhadap pola kerja sama yang fleksibel. Permasalahan muncul ketika Joint Operation Agreement dalam praktik menunjukkan karakteristik yang menyerupai firma, terutama dari aspek pengelolaan usaha bersama dan pertanggungjawaban terhadap pihak ketiga. Putusan Nomor 01 K/N/1999 menjadi rujukan penting dalam meneguhkan penyamaan Joint Operation Agreement dengan firma berdasarkan substansi hubungan hukum yang tercipta di antara para pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan Joint Operation Agreement sebagai perjanjian innominate yang disamakan dengan firma serta mengkaji implikasinya terhadap kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyamaan Joint Operation Agreement dengan firma memiliki konsekuensi yuridis berupa pertanggungjawaban tanggung renteng terhadap pihak ketiga. Kepastian hukum menuntut perumusan klausul perjanjian yang tegas mengenai kewenangan, pembagian risiko, dan tanggung jawab para pihak. Kejelasan konstruksi hukum tersebut menjadi prasyarat utama bagi perlindungan hukum yang adil dan berimbang dalam praktik kerja sama operasi.
Co-Authors Alfiyan Rahmat Dani Utomo Ariesta Chandra Perdana Claudia Theresia Sihotang Danar Aji Kirana Danar Aji Kirana Muhammad Galih Sampurno Radithya Fathan Al Gibran Rayi Kharisma Rajib Wisnu Hesa