Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

GOVERNMENT HEGEMONY VS. DESA ADAT RESISTANCE: DYNAMICS OF REGULATING DESA ADAT IN BALI Putu Gede Sridana; I Wayan P. Windia; I Nyoman Darma Putra; I Nyoman Suarka
E-Journal of Cultural Studies Vol 17 No 2 (2024): Volume 17 Number 2 May 2024
Publisher : Cultural Studies Doctorate Program, Postgraduate Program of Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/cs.2024.v17.i02.p04

Abstract

The government's strategy to promote desa adat (customary village) materialized through the implementation of Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2019 in Bali, fostering a dynamic interaction aimed at enhancing desa adat resilience. This study examines the dynamic forms of interaction between these institutions. Data were obtained utilizing a qualitative approach, including literature reviews, observations, and interviews. The data analysis results are described using theories of hegemony, ideology, discourse, and the power of knowledge. The research concludes that diverse forms of interaction between the government and desa adat encompass involvement in the formulation of desa adat regulations; participation in religious rituals and cultural activities; and relevance in financial governance. Theoretical findings suggest that power operates through interactions to assert dominance over desa adat by spreading discourse, knowledge, and ideological strategies. This article provides valuable insights for shaping regulations that better align with the identity and autonomy of desa adat. Keywords: dynamic interactions, desa adats, Regional Regulation Number 4/2019
Conflict and Harmony Between Desa Adat and the Bali Provincial Government Following the Enactment of the Regional Regulation on Customary Village 2019 I Putu Gede Sridana; I Wayan P. Windia; I Nyoman Suarka; Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha
Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): Reclaiming Cultural Heritage
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JKB.2024.v14.i02.p12

Abstract

The Bali Provincial Government collaborates with desa adat (customary village) to enhance their strength and resilience, notably through the enactment of Province of Bali Regulation Number 4 of 2019. However, excessive regulatory impact may diverge from this goal. This study explores the ideological framework shaping interactions between desa adat and the government post-regulation. Using a qualitative methodology, data were collected through literature review, observations, and in-depth interviews. The findings draw on theories of hegemony, ideology, discourse, and the power of knowledge. Hidden ideologies of power, capital, and religion influence these interactions. The regulation's uniform framework on diverse desa adat leads to resistance and inefficiency, reflecting hegemonic control and the use of ideology and knowledge to legitimize power. This article contributes to developing legislation that empowers the desa adat while maintaining their unique characteristics.
Conflict and Harmony Between Desa Adat and the Bali Provincial Government Following the Enactment of the Regional Regulation on Customary Village 2019 I Putu Gede Sridana; I Wayan P. Windia; I Nyoman Suarka; Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha
Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): Reclaiming Cultural Heritage
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JKB.2024.v14.i02.p12

Abstract

The Bali Provincial Government collaborates with desa adat (customary village) to enhance their strength and resilience, notably through the enactment of Province of Bali Regulation Number 4 of 2019. However, excessive regulatory impact may diverge from this goal. This study explores the ideological framework shaping interactions between desa adat and the government post-regulation. Using a qualitative methodology, data were collected through literature review, observations, and in-depth interviews. The findings draw on theories of hegemony, ideology, discourse, and the power of knowledge. Hidden ideologies of power, capital, and religion influence these interactions. The regulation's uniform framework on diverse desa adat leads to resistance and inefficiency, reflecting hegemonic control and the use of ideology and knowledge to legitimize power. This article contributes to developing legislation that empowers the desa adat while maintaining their unique characteristics.