Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Kewarganegaraan
Putri Meilika Nadilatasya
Universitas Tarumanagara
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Cryptocurrency Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Destiana Vani Candra; Devika Graciella Gunawan; Putri Meilika Nadilatasya
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6466

Abstract

Abstrak Cryptocurrency merupakan mata uang digital yang berbasis blockchain dan sistem jaringanya berupa peer to peer (P2P). Di Indonesia aset kripto termasuk dalam perdagangan berjangka komoditi yang dikeluarkan oleh Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (Bappebti) Kementerian Perdagangan dan telah legal di Indonesia sebagai aset komoditas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui cryptocurrency sebagai objek jaminan fidusia dan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum yang akan didapatkan oleh para pengguna cryptocurrency. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian pendekatan yuridis normatif dan menggunakan bahan hukum primer. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis mendapatkan hasil bahwa cryptocurrency dapat dijadikan sebagai objek jaminan fidusia berdasarkan peraturan Bappebti Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 dan Surat Edaran Bappebti Nomor 11 Tahun 2022. Serta para pengguna cryptocurrency dapat dilindungi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Teknologi. Kata Kunci: Cryptocurrency, Objek Jaminan Fidusia Abstract Cryptocurrency is a blockchain-based digital currency and its network system is peer to peer (P2P). In Indonesia, crypto assets are included in commodity futures trading issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency (Bappebti) of the Ministry of Trade and are legal in Indonesia as commodity assets. The purpose of this research is to find out cryptocurrency as an object of fiduciary security and to find out the legal protection that cryptocurrency users will get. This research uses a normative juridical research approach and uses primary legal materials. In this research, the author obtained the results that cryptocurrency can be used as an object of fiduciary security based on CoFTRA Regulation Number 5 of 2019 and CoFTRA Circular Letter Number 11 of 2022. And cryptocurrency users can be protected based on the Consumer Protection Law and the Information and Technology Law. Keywords: Cryptocurrency, Fiduciary Security Object
Netralitas Majelis Kehormatan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Menegakkan Kode Etik Hakim: Kajian Perbandingan dengan Komisi Yudisial Rasji; Namira Diffany Nuzan; Putri Meilika Nadilatasya; Sherley Lie
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 10 (2024): Tema Filsafat Hukum, Politik Hukum dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.932

Abstract

The Indonesian state is a state of law that actually prioritizes law over politics. The Indonesian state in regulating the structure of the state administration and the actions of its people always prioritizes the laws that have been compiled and made by the government and must also be implemented. In its implementation, the State of Indonesia has set up a judicial institution which specializes in overseeing the code of ethics of a Judge who will decide the case, namely the Judicial Commission. The purpose of this study is to determine the neutrality of an independent institution, namely the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court in carrying out its duties using a research method approach to legislation or pre-existing literature. In the discussion of this paper, several new facts were found regarding the supervision carried out by the Judicial Commission as a judicial supervisory institution that only supervises Supreme Court Judges but does not supervise Constitutional Judges. Indeed, if the Constitution conducts direct supervision of Constitutional Judges, it will certainly lead to non-neutrality in the implementation of such supervision.
Co-Authors Destiana Vani Candra Devika Graciella Gunawan Namira Diffany Nuzan Rasji Sherley Lie