Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) Indonesia Private Law Review
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Universitas Jember
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TRADEMARK PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA, OMAN, AND THE PHILIPPINES I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali; Princess Alyssa Tee-anastacio
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v7i1.4775

Abstract

Trademark protection is a fundamental element of intellectual property law that supports innovation, economic growth, and legal certainty while increasingly contributing to sustainable development through fair business practices, local market strengthening, and sustainable employment. This study examines trademark protection regimes in Indonesia, Oman, and the Philippines using a normative and comparative legal approach to assess their contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly in relation to economic growth, innovation, and institutional strength. The findings show that although all three countries formally recognize the importance of trademark protection, they differ significantly in regulatory design and enforcement, with Indonesia facing persistent enforcement challenges, Oman demonstrating strong legal structure but limited practical effectiveness, and the Philippines adopting a more adaptive and institutionally robust approach. The study concludes that trademark protection can function as an effective tool for sustainable development if supported by stronger institutional capacity, greater alignment with international standards, and enhanced regional cooperation.
Balancing National Constitutions and International Trade Commitments: Comparative Insights from Indonesia, Thailand, and India Hananto Widodo; Intan Lovisonnya; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo; Uzodinma Yurriens Ezenduka
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4813

Abstract

Economic globalization has heightened tensions between national sovereignty and international trade obligations. This study compares constitutional review mechanisms in Indonesia, Thailand, and India, representing civil law and common law systems. Using normative legal methods with statute and comparative analysis, it finds that Indonesia applies ex post review of ratification laws, Thailand uses preventive ex ante review, and India employs substantive, precedent-based judicial review. Effectiveness varies: India achieves high substantive effectiveness through judicial activism, Thailand excels procedurally, and Indonesia remains limited to formal review. The study concludes that constitutional review effectiveness depends on institutional design, legal tradition, and the ability to balance constitutional supremacy with international commitments.
Co-Authors hananto widodo I Gede Agus Kurniawan Intan Lovisonnya Princess Alyssa Tee-anastacio Putu Aras Samsithawrati Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali Uzodinma Yurriens Ezenduka