Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Res Nullius Law Journal DEVOTE: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC)
Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang
Universitas Komputer Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Optimizing the Health System Through Increasing Health Service Guarantees in the Context of Fulfilling Human Rights Post the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Diah Pudjiastuti
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 18, No 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v18i2.47957

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact, especially in the health sector. Health facilities and personnel play a key role in handling this pandemic. The importance of improving the quality of health services does not only depend on regulations, but also structure and culture as an interconnected system. This pandemic has been an important lesson, highlighting the readiness and quality of health services. Community resilience emphasizes the need for health protection as a state responsibility and a constitutional right of citizens. In facing the future, the role of the state, regulations and systems will be crucial in managing the health of its citizens in a sustainable manner. Using normative juridical research methods, the results of the analysis show that the state has full authority through the formation of regulations, infrastructure, improving the quality of human resources, and regulating the health system. This step aims to increase guarantees of public health services and fulfill citizens' human rights in the future.
The Impact Of Artificial Intelligence Development On Personal Data Protection In An Effort To Achieve Legal Certainty Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Musa Darwin Pane; Diah Pudjiastuti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5832

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionised various sectors, including law, by providing significant efficiency and innovation. However, this development also presents complex challenges related to data privacy. This research aims to analyse, first, how legal protection of personal data in AI applications can help achieve legal certainty, and second, what efforts are being made to strengthen the legal framework in addressing data privacy challenges posed by AI development. The legal research method used is normative legal research. The findings highlight that improvements are needed in the existing legal framework to be more responsive to AI advancements. Therefore, in order to achieve legal certainty, the legislature must develop more specific regulations regarding the use of AI in the context of personal data protection and establish a task force responsible for public outreach and education to raise public awareness about the importance of personal data protection
The Spread of Hoaxes on Social Media: A Communication Analysis and Legal Review of the ITE Law Olih Solihin; Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Safutra Rantona rantona; Yuni Mogot rantona
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6467

Abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technology has transformed social media into the primary platform for information dissemination. While it offers speed and accessibility, social media also enables the uncontrolled spread of misinformation and hoaxes. This study aims to describe the pattern of hoax dissemination on social media from a digital communication perspective and to analyze how Indonesian Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) responds to this phenomenon from a legal standpoint. Using a descriptive qualitative method based on literature review, this study combines communication theories—particularly framing and agenda setting—with normative legal analysis. Hoaxes are often framed emotionally and sensationally to attract public attention and manipulate perception. Through agenda setting mechanisms, such content dominates digital discourse, reinforcing its perceived importance regardless of truth. The findings suggest that the spread of hoaxes is driven not only by content but also by algorithmic amplification and public vulnerability due to low digital literacy. While the ITE Law provides a legal framework to address online misinformation, its enforcement faces challenges such as ambiguous legal language and difficulties in proving intent. Therefore, an interdisciplinary approach combining communication strategy and legal reform is needed to effectively combat the hoax epidemic. This study contributes to both academic discourse and policy recommendations aimed at building a more informed and resilient digital society.
PENINGKATAN KESADARAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN MELALUI EDUKASI DAN PENDAMPINGAN DI DESA MEKARSARI KABUPATEN BANDUNG BARAT Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Musa Darwin Pane; Subagyo Sri Utomo; Happy Ferovina Wuntu; Sutarjo Sutarjo; Diah Pudjiastuti
Devote: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Devote : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global, 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/devote.v4i3.4537

Abstract

Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PkM) ini dilaksanakan di Desa Mekarsari, Kabupaten Bandung Barat, dengan tujuan meningkatkan kesadaran hukum masyarakat dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan melalui edukasi hukum dan pendampingan langsung. Permasalahan yang dihadapi masyarakat setempat adalah rendahnya pemahaman terhadap implikasi dokumen pernyataan kepemilikan tanah, kurangnya pengetahuan tentang tahapan penyelesaian sengketa, serta munculnya dilema kewenangan Kepala Desa yang sering diminta memberikan keterangan sebagai saksi atas tindakan hukum RT atau RW dalam menandatangani dokumen pertanahan. Metode pelaksanaan kegiatan meliputi penyuluhan hukum oleh narasumber akademisi, diskusi interaktif dengan perangkat desa dan masyarakat, serta simulasi penyusunan dokumen dan mekanisme mediasi sederhana. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan dalam pemahaman masyarakat mengenai pentingnya sertifikat tanah sebagai bukti kepemilikan sah, prosedur administrasi pertanahan sesuai ketentuan hukum, serta alternatif penyelesaian sengketa melalui jalur mediasi maupun formal. Selain itu, kegiatan ini menghasilkan rekomendasi tentang tata kelola pertanahan yang lebih jelas dan berkeadilan. Dengan demikian, PKM ini tidak hanya memberikan solusi terhadap permasalahan aktual di desa, tetapi juga berkontribusi dalam mewujudkan kemandirian hukum masyarakat dan mendukung pembangunan desa yang berkelanjutan. ABSTRACT This Community Service Program (PkM) was carried out in Mekarsari Village, West Bandung Regency, with the aim of enhancing community legal awareness in resolving land disputes through legal education and direct assistance. The main issues faced by the local community include limited understanding of the implications of land ownership declaration documents, lack of knowledge regarding the stages of dispute resolution, and the dilemma of the Village Head’s authority who is often requested to provide testimony as a witness in legal actions taken by neighborhood (RT) or community (RW) leaders when signing land ownership documents. The implementation methods involved legal counseling delivered by academic experts, interactive discussions with village officials and residents, as well as simulations on document drafting and simple mediation mechanisms. The results demonstrated a significant increase in the community’s understanding of the importance of land certificates as legitimate evidence of ownership, administrative procedures for land registration in accordance with legal provisions, and alternative dispute resolution through mediation and formal mechanisms. Furthermore, the program produced recommendations for clearer and fairer land governance. Thus, this PkM not only provided solutions to actual problems in the village but also contributed to fostering community legal independence and supporting sustainable village development.
Analysis of Law Enforcement Regarding Fault in Defamation Crimes Through Electronic Media Diah Pudjiastuti; Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang
Humanities, Society, and Community Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Humanities, Society, and Community
Publisher : Research Synergy Foundation Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31098/hsc.v3i2.3068

Abstract

This research investigates the enforcement of defamation laws in electronic media, focusing on the interpretation of "intentional" and "unauthorized" elements under Law No. 1 of 2024, which amends Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law). The urgency of this study arises from legal ambiguities and the rising number of online defamation cases, highlighting inconsistencies in judicial interpretations and enforcement challenges. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes statutory provisions, jurisprudence, and fault theory to assess the practical application of defamation laws. The findings reveal a lack of uniformity in judicial decisions, emphasizing the need for clearer definitions and standardized legal interpretations. This study underscores the necessity of refining existing legal provisions to enhance legal certainty and the effectiveness of enforcement. Practical implications include increasing public legal awareness of responsible digital communication and implementing preventive measures against cyber defamation. To address legal gaps, this research recommends legislative reforms to clarify legal definitions, promote alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and strengthen law enforcement training, ensuring a balance between legal protection and freedom of expression in the digital era.
Adequacy of Indonesian Cybercriminal Law Against Generative AI-Based Social Engineering Attacks Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Diah Pudjiastuti; Sutarjo
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Volume 6 No 1 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v6i1.19927

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly amplified the sophistication and scale of social engineering attacks, posing unprecedented challenges to legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. This article examines whether the existing Indonesian cyber criminal law framework primarily Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE) as amended by Law No. 1 of 2024, along with Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (UU PDP) and the new Criminal Code (KUHP 2023) is adequate to address AI-driven social engineering attacks such as deepfake-assisted phishing, AI-generated vishing, and automated pretexting schemes. Employing a normative legal research methodology with a comparative approach, this study analyses the applicable legal provisions against the technical characteristics of generative AI-enabled social engineering and compares Indonesia’s regulatory posture with the European Union’s AI Act and the United States’ sector-based frameworks. The findings reveal three critical legislative gaps: the absence of AI-specific criminal provisions, insufficient evidentiary standards for AI-generated content, and inadequate mechanisms for attributing criminal liability in multi-actor AI-mediated offences. This article concludes that Indonesia’s current legal framework is structurally inadequate and recommends the enactment of a dedicated AI Criminal Liability Law and targeted amendments to the UU ITE to incorporate AI-specific definitional, evidentiary, and liability provisions commensurate with the contemporary threat landscape.
Dwi-Kewenangan Penegakan Hukum: Evaluasi Kritis Mekanisme Peradilan Koneksitas pada Tindak Pidana Umum di Indonesia Dio Aljabal Aprido; Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 2 No 1 (2026): : September: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/apfvne57

Abstract

The connectivity court mechanism integrates General Courts and Military Courts when an offense is jointly committed by persons subject to different jurisdictions. This study critically evaluates connectivity proceedings in general offenses, focusing on dual jurisdiction, coordination, forum determination, and implications for legal certainty and justice. The study employs doctrinal legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to examine legislation, legal doctrines, and previous studies. Materials are analyzed qualitatively through grammatical, systematic, historical, and teleological interpretation, supported by vertical and horizontal harmonization. The findings indicate that the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code strengthens coordination through joint investigation and prosecution, yet jurisdictional conflicts remain among the Indonesian National Police, Military Police, Public Prosecutors, Military Prosecutors, the Deputy Attorney General for Military Crimes, and PAPERA. Institutional structures and jurisdictional interests may impede integration. The study recommends stronger coordination, objective forum-selection criteria, and clearer limits on institutional discretion to establish connectivity proceedings as an integrated jurisdictional model safeguarding legal certainty, independence, accountability, and justice.
Co-Authors Diah Pudjiastuti Dio Aljabal Aprido Happy Ferovina Wuntu Musa Darwin Pane Olih Solihin Safutra Rantona rantona Subagyo Sri Utomo Sutarjo Sutarjo Sutarjo Yuni Mogot rantona