Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENINGKATAN KESADARAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERTANAHAN MELALUI EDUKASI DAN PENDAMPINGAN DI DESA MEKARSARI KABUPATEN BANDUNG BARAT Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Musa Darwin Pane; Subagyo Sri Utomo; Happy Ferovina Wuntu; Sutarjo Sutarjo; Diah Pudjiastuti
Devote: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Devote : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global, 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/devote.v4i3.4537

Abstract

Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PkM) ini dilaksanakan di Desa Mekarsari, Kabupaten Bandung Barat, dengan tujuan meningkatkan kesadaran hukum masyarakat dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan melalui edukasi hukum dan pendampingan langsung. Permasalahan yang dihadapi masyarakat setempat adalah rendahnya pemahaman terhadap implikasi dokumen pernyataan kepemilikan tanah, kurangnya pengetahuan tentang tahapan penyelesaian sengketa, serta munculnya dilema kewenangan Kepala Desa yang sering diminta memberikan keterangan sebagai saksi atas tindakan hukum RT atau RW dalam menandatangani dokumen pertanahan. Metode pelaksanaan kegiatan meliputi penyuluhan hukum oleh narasumber akademisi, diskusi interaktif dengan perangkat desa dan masyarakat, serta simulasi penyusunan dokumen dan mekanisme mediasi sederhana. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan dalam pemahaman masyarakat mengenai pentingnya sertifikat tanah sebagai bukti kepemilikan sah, prosedur administrasi pertanahan sesuai ketentuan hukum, serta alternatif penyelesaian sengketa melalui jalur mediasi maupun formal. Selain itu, kegiatan ini menghasilkan rekomendasi tentang tata kelola pertanahan yang lebih jelas dan berkeadilan. Dengan demikian, PKM ini tidak hanya memberikan solusi terhadap permasalahan aktual di desa, tetapi juga berkontribusi dalam mewujudkan kemandirian hukum masyarakat dan mendukung pembangunan desa yang berkelanjutan. ABSTRACT This Community Service Program (PkM) was carried out in Mekarsari Village, West Bandung Regency, with the aim of enhancing community legal awareness in resolving land disputes through legal education and direct assistance. The main issues faced by the local community include limited understanding of the implications of land ownership declaration documents, lack of knowledge regarding the stages of dispute resolution, and the dilemma of the Village Head’s authority who is often requested to provide testimony as a witness in legal actions taken by neighborhood (RT) or community (RW) leaders when signing land ownership documents. The implementation methods involved legal counseling delivered by academic experts, interactive discussions with village officials and residents, as well as simulations on document drafting and simple mediation mechanisms. The results demonstrated a significant increase in the community’s understanding of the importance of land certificates as legitimate evidence of ownership, administrative procedures for land registration in accordance with legal provisions, and alternative dispute resolution through mediation and formal mechanisms. Furthermore, the program produced recommendations for clearer and fairer land governance. Thus, this PkM not only provided solutions to actual problems in the village but also contributed to fostering community legal independence and supporting sustainable village development.
Human Rights Protection Related to Arrest, Detention, and Judicial Remedies: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang; Athari Farhani; Subagyo Sri Utomo
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v10i1.30553

Abstract

Arrest, detention, and pretrial legal remedies constitute crucial stages in criminal procedure because they determine the extent to which state coercive power is constrained by due process and human rights guarantees. This study aims to examine and compare the legal regulation and practical implementation of arrest, detention, and pretrial review mechanisms in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, with particular attention to their compliance with human rights standards. Methodologically, this research employs normative legal research using a doctrinal and institutional comparative approach, analyzing statutory provisions, procedural regulations, constitutional safeguards, and relevant reports and legal materials. The findings show that Indonesia provides relatively stronger procedural safeguards through the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the praperadilan mechanism, which functions as judicial control over unlawful arrest and detention. Egypt formally recognizes legal oversight through the public prosecution and judicial review, yet persistent implementation gaps raise concerns regarding prolonged pretrial detention and limited procedural transparency. In contrast, Saudi Arabia demonstrates weaker independent judicial supervision at the pretrial stage, increasing the risk of arbitrary detention and executive overreach. This comparative analysis concludes that strengthening effective judicial review, access to legal counsel, and procedural accountability is essential to prevent abuses of power. The study recommends reinforcing institutional checks on detention practices to ensure greater alignment with international human rights principles and due process requirements.