Fendi Setyawan
University of Jember, Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Implementation of the Legal Justice Concept in Indonesia: Study of John Locke's Perspective Abdul Haris Alifianto; Belva Vidaloka Chrisari; Dominikus Rato; Fendi Setyawan
Rechtenstudent Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Rechtenstudent April 2024
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v5i1.321

Abstract

Law serves as the fundamental cornerstone of society, crucial for maintaining order and addressing societal challenges. Within a rule of law framework, the availability of legal sources facilitates the exploration and understanding of legal principles. However, the concept of justice, inherent to human existence, remains elusive and multifaceted, defying simple translation. This study aims to delve into the essence of justice from a legal philosophical perspective. Employing a normative juridical approach, data collection includes diverse scholarly materials and legal documents. The findings underscore the significance of justice as a pivotal concept in human affairs, transcending disciplinary boundaries. Moreover, within legal philosophy, justice emerges as a guiding principle embedded in the fabric of law, grounded in righteousness, fairness, and accountability.
Legal Protection for Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending Debtors Against Doxing Actions by Creditors Muhammad Fatoni Kurniawan; Fendi Setyawan; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti
Rechtenstudent Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Rechtenstudent December 2024
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v5i3.356

Abstract

Technological advancements have increased financial access through financial technology (fintech) services, particularly peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, yet these developments also present significant risks. Illegal online lenders (pinjol) often misuse personal data and employ intimidating debt collection practices, while large-scale data breaches, such as those involving BPJS Kesehatan, Tokopedia, and Kredit Plus where 890,000 customer records were allegedly leaked and sold highlight the urgent need for effective debtor protection. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches to examine the legal framework for debtor protection against doxing practices. The findings show that legal protection is crucial to maintaining stability, security, and user trust in fintech services. Protection mechanisms are divided into internal measures, which regulate transparency, fair treatment, confidentiality, and risk management, and external measures provided by authorities through law enforcement, administrative sanctions, and dispute resolution. Despite the existence of the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law), the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), and Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations, regulatory disharmony, weak supervision, and low public awareness hinder effective protection. Strengthening PDP Law enforcement and explicitly prohibiting doxing practices in OJK regulations are recommended.
Legal Protection for Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending Debtors Against Doxing Actions by Creditors Muhammad Fatoni Kurniawan; Fendi Setyawan; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti
Rechtenstudent Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Rechtenstudent December 2024
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v5i3.356

Abstract

Technological advancements have increased financial access through financial technology (fintech) services, particularly peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, yet these developments also present significant risks. Illegal online lenders (pinjol) often misuse personal data and employ intimidating debt collection practices, while large-scale data breaches, such as those involving BPJS Kesehatan, Tokopedia, and Kredit Plus where 890,000 customer records were allegedly leaked and sold highlight the urgent need for effective debtor protection. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches to examine the legal framework for debtor protection against doxing practices. The findings show that legal protection is crucial to maintaining stability, security, and user trust in fintech services. Protection mechanisms are divided into internal measures, which regulate transparency, fair treatment, confidentiality, and risk management, and external measures provided by authorities through law enforcement, administrative sanctions, and dispute resolution. Despite the existence of the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law), the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), and Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations, regulatory disharmony, weak supervision, and low public awareness hinder effective protection. Strengthening PDP Law enforcement and explicitly prohibiting doxing practices in OJK regulations are recommended.
THE WAKAF BENEFITS OF SHARIA SHARES AS PRODUCTIVE WAQF MODERNIZATION: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA Ana Laela Fatikhatul Choiriyah; Muhammad Imaduddin; Fendi Setyawan; Bhim Prakoso
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4807

Abstract

Waqf, as an important form of financial worship, has significant economic potential and has evolved from traditional forms such as land and buildings to innovations like cash waqf, which is more flexible for developing productive enterprises. Although the potential for cash waqf in Indonesia is very high, reaching Rp180 trillion per year according to the Indonesian Waqf Board, its management is not yet optimal. The aim of this research is to analyze and compare the development of Sharia stock benefit waqf as a form of productive waqf modernization in Indonesia and Malaysia, and to identify its development potential to increase the effectiveness and benefits of waqf in the context of modern Islamic economics. This research uses normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, focusing on analyzing regulations and legal concepts related to Sharia stock benefit waqf in Indonesia and Malaysia. Legal sources include primary, secondary, and tertiary materials, with data collection techniques through literature study and data analysis using a comparative qualitative approach. The research results show that stock waqf has been implemented in Indonesia and Malaysia in accordance with applicable regulations, with differences in the institutional structure of its management. In Indonesia, stock waqf is regulated by the Ministry of Religion, the Indonesian Waqf Board, and the National Sharia Council, while in Malaysia it is managed by the State Islamic Religious Council in each state. Indonesia focuses on Sharia stock waqf or its profits, while Malaysia raises funds through share offerings to finance specific programs. Nevertheless, the potential for stock-based waqf in both countries has not been optimally maximized. Factors influencing development in Indonesia include stock waqf literacy, nazir capacity, and inefficient digitalization, while in Malaysia it is constrained by regulatory inconsistencies between states, lack of a transparent and accountable regulatory framework, and limited regulations on mechanisms for collecting and distributing cash waqf including shares.