Sunardi Sunardi
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Intellectual History of Entrepreneurship Education in Indonesian Higher Education Imam Shofwan; Sunardi Sunardi; Abdul Rahman; Gunarhadi Gunarhadi
Paramita: Historical Studies Journal Vol. 36 No. 1 (2026): Social and Intellectual History
Publisher : istory Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang in collaboration with Masyarakat Sejarawan Indonesia (Indonesian Historical Society)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/paramita.vi.29939

Abstract

Abstract: Entrepreneurship education in Indonesia did not emerge as a sudden response to contemporary economic challenges, but rather evolved through a long, intellectual, and policy-driven process shaped by historical, political, and socio-cultural dynamics. While existing studies predominantly focus on the effectiveness and outcomes of entrepreneurship education, relatively little attention has been paid to its historical and intellectual foundations. This study addresses this gap by examining the intellectual history of entrepreneurship education in Indonesian higher education. Using a qualitative historical approach combined with discourse analysis, the study analyzes primary sources, including education policies, curriculum regulations, and official government documents, alongside secondary academic literature from the 1980s to the present. The findings reveal that entrepreneurship education gradually shifted from a marginal development discourse during the late New Order period to a formally institutionalized component of higher education following the Reformasi era, particularly through the National Education System Law of 2003 and subsequent curriculum reforms. This trajectory reflects a broader paradigm shift from a bureaucratic education model toward one emphasizing innovation, self-reliance, and an entrepreneurial mindset, further reinforced by the Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka policy. The study contributes to the historiography of education by contextualizing entrepreneurship education within Indonesia’s intellectual, ideological, and policy landscape, highlighting the importance of historically grounded perspectives for evaluating current and future educational reforms. Abstrak: Pendidikan kewirausahaan di Indonesia tidak muncul sebagai respons yang tiba-tiba terhadap tantangan ekonomi kontemporer, melainkan berkembang melalui proses panjang yang bersifat intelektual dan digerakkan oleh kebijakan, serta dibentuk oleh dinamika historis, politik, dan sosial-budaya. Sementara kajian-kajian yang ada lebih banyak berfokus pada efektivitas dan capaian pendidikan kewirausahaan, perhatian terhadap fondasi historis dan intelektualnya masih relatif terbatas. Penelitian ini mengisi celah tersebut dengan mengkaji sejarah intelektual pendidikan kewirausahaan dalam pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan historis kualitatif yang dipadukan dengan analisis wacana, penelitian ini menganalisis sumber-sumber primer berupa kebijakan pendidikan, regulasi kurikulum, dan dokumen resmi pemerintah, serta literatur akademik sekunder sejak dekade 1980-an hingga masa kini. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendidikan kewirausahaan secara bertahap bergeser dari wacana pembangunan yang bersifat marginal pada akhir masa Orde Baru menjadi komponen yang terinstitusionalisasi secara formal dalam pendidikan tinggi pasca era Reformasi, khususnya melalui Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2003 dan berbagai reformasi kurikulum setelahnya. Trajektori ini mencerminkan pergeseran paradigma yang lebih luas, dari model pendidikan yang birokratis menuju model yang menekankan inovasi, kemandirian, dan pola pikir kewirausahaan, yang semakin diperkuat melalui kebijakan Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka. Studi ini berkontribusi pada historiografi pendidikan dengan menempatkan pendidikan kewirausahaan dalam lanskap intelektual, ideologis, dan kebijakan pendidikan Indonesia, serta menegaskan pentingnya perspektif historis dalam mengevaluasi reformasi pendidikan masa kini dan masa depan.
Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Socioeconomic Participation, Access to Services, Quality of Life, and Social Inclusion Among People with Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Abdul Malik; Sunardi Sunardi; Suminah Suminah; Haryani Saptaningtyas; Ghanis Putra Widhanarto
Journal of Nonformal Education Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): Community Education, Adult Education and Community Empowerment
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jone.v12i2.58808

Abstract

Background – The persistent exclusion of people with disabilities from social, economic, and health systems remains a critical global issue, driven by structural barriers, stigma, and unequal access to resources. Despite a growing number of intervention studies, evidence on their comparative effectiveness across contexts remains fragmented. Research Urgency – Existing disability interventions vary widely in design, implementation, and contextual adaptability, while systematic evidence on which models are most effective in improving inclusion outcomes is limited, particularly regarding how intervention types explain effect variability across studies. Research Objectives – This study systematically synthesizes the effectiveness of disability-related interventions in improving social participation, access to services, and inclusion outcomes, and examines the moderating role of intervention type in explaining between-study heterogeneity. Research Method – A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on 23 empirical studies. Random-effects and mixed-effects meta-regression models were applied to estimate pooled effect sizes and assess intervention type as a moderator of heterogeneity. Research Findings – The results indicate a significant overall positive effect of interventions on inclusion outcomes (estimate = 0.480; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.229–0.732). Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I² = 28.11%, Q = 39.221, p = 0.013). Moderator analysis revealed that intervention type significantly influenced effect size (QM = 19.817, p = 0.0002), with certain intervention categories demonstrating stronger effects. Evidence of potential publication bias was observed (Egger’s test p < 0.001), although results remained stable under sensitivity analysis. Research Conclusion – Disability-related interventions are generally effective in improving inclusion outcomes; however, their effectiveness depends significantly on the type of intervention implemented and contextual conditions. Research Novelty/Contribution – This study provides a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of disability inclusion interventions and advances the literature by identifying intervention type as a significant moderator of effectiveness, offering evidence-based guidance for policy design and inclusive development strategies.