Atmojo, Danang Puji
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Decision-Making by Individuals in Conflict of Interest: A Case Study of a Civil Servant who Doubles as the Owner of a Private Sectors in Yogyakarta Atmojo, Danang Puji; Aoki, Haruka
Vox Populi Vol 7 No 1 (2024): VOX POPULI
Publisher : ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI (UIN) ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/vp.v7i1.49178

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the conflict of interest experienced by individual employees of government agencies in the Special Region of Yogyakarta who are active in private art institutions. The theoretical framework used in the research includes the concept of conflict of interest and decision-making theory. The research method used is an interpretative phenomenological approach that focuses on describing and interpreting the direct subjective experiences of individuals related to the phenomenon of conflict of interest. Data were obtained through direct interviews with the interviewees, who are former civil servants in a Yogyakarta government agency and owners of private cultural studios. The results show that the Special Fund allocated has had a significant impact on the development of arts and culture in Yogyakarta, but has also resulted in conflict of interest issues among individuals who play multiple roles. The conclusions of the study highlight the importance of clear legal regulations related to conflict of interest as well as the need for a deeper understanding of ethics and public duty for individuals who play a role in both sectors.
Inclusive Education, Disability, and Interfaith Justice: Legal and Religious Barriers in Plural Indonesian Society Lestari , Eta; Ani Purwanti; Ratna Herawati; Atmojo, Danang Puji; Saputra, Meidi
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Digital Society and Interfaith Legal Challenges
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ciils.v4i2.32547

Abstract

Inclusive education is widely recognized as a fundamental human right; however, its realization for persons with disabilities remains uneven in plural societies such as Indonesia. This study examines inclusive education as an interfaith legal issue, arguing that the persistent failure to achieve substantive equality is not merely a problem of weak policy implementation but a consequence of normative dissonance among state law, religious norms, and social practices. Employing a juridical-empirical approach within a legal pluralism framework, the study draws on qualitative data from interviews, observations, and document analysis to explore how stigma and exclusion are socially and normatively produced. The findings reveal that disability stigma is reinforced through paternalistic religious interpretations, institutional routines in schools, and the lack of harmonization between Law No. 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities and the National Education System Law. At the same time, religious values across faith traditions possess significant normative potential to function as modalities of inclusion when mobilized through interfaith engagement. This study contributes to socio-legal scholarship by reframing inclusive education as a contested normative space shaped by interfaith dynamics and legal pluralism, and by highlighting the necessity of legal reform alongside cross-religious collaboration to achieve substantive justice in education.