Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Urgensi Penyelamatan Informasi Arsip Kearstitekturan dan Kartografi Eks PSTA BATAN Dalam Masa Transisi Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional Indrawardani, Ken Fitria; Kamajati, Dhatu; Wijaya, Allen Relyan; Rokhmat, Miftahu
Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan Vol 9, No 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Library and Information Science Study Program, Faculty of Humanities, Univ. Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lenpust.v9i2.53653

Abstract

Arsip vital eks Pusat Sains dan Teknologi Akselerator (PSTA) Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional atau BATAN merupakan salah satu arsip dinamis yang teridentifikasi oleh Tim Layanan Arsip Kawasan Multi Unit Kerja Yogyakarta Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) sejak terbitnya Peraturan Presiden (PERPRES) tentang Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional No 78 Tahun 2021 mengenai peleburan dari beberapa entitas seperti Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional (BATAN), Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT), Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI), Lembaga Antariksa dan Penerbangan (LAPAN) dan Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi (Kemenristek). Perhatian khusus diperlukan terhadap pengelolaan fisik dan informasi arsip vital eks PSTA BATAN yang sebagian teridentifikasi dalam kondisi rusak. Terdapat 375 nomor arsip vital eks PSTA BATAN yang telah teridentifikasi dan merupakan arsip kearsitekturan dan kartografi dengan media konvensional kertas. Dari data didapatkan 15% arsip dalam kondisi rusak sebagian hingga tidak baik dan 85% masih dalam kondisi baik. Dokumen ini secara seluruhnya merupakan arsip milik eks PSTA BATAN. Alih media merupakan salah satu upaya dalam pemeliharaan arsip yang biasanya dilakukan untuk mencegah kerusakan fisik yang nantinya akan berpengaruh pada hilangnya sebagian informasi yang terdapat pada arsip kearsitekturan dan kartografi tersebut. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kebutuhan dan upaya penyusunan langkah strategis dalam rangkaian kegiatan penyelamatan informasi arsip. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan analitik, yaitu suatu penelitian yang berusaha menjawab permasalahan yang ada berdasarkan data-data. Data yang didapat merupakan hasil identifikasi terhadap keseluruhan arsip kearsitekturan dan kartografi. Hasil penelitian ini merujuk pada adanya rekomendasi mengenai urgensi langkah strategis yang dapat diambil yaitu dalam penyusunan program penyelamatan informasi arsip kearsitekturan dan kartografi dengan didukung dengan penguatan kompetensi SDM pengelola dan perangkat yang digunakan dan penyusunan Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP).
Persepsi Periset Pusat Riset Teknologi dan Proses Pangan BRIN terhadap Pengelolaan Arsip Hasil Penelitian Indrawardani, Ken Fitria; Kamajati, Dhatu; Aulianto, Dwi Ridho
Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan Vol 17, No 2 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : Perpustakaan dan Arsip Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/khazanah.93257

Abstract

Documents from research activities (substantive archives) at Research Center for Food Technology and Processing (PRTPP)-National Research and Inovation Agency (BRIN) contain essential information regarding research progress in Food Technology and Processes. Referring to this, researchers need to submit hardcopy archives of research results to archive managers so that archival principles can manage the information. However, only a few researchers have proposed these archives to archive managers. This research aims to discover why researchers at PRTPP do not submit hardcopy archives of research results to archive managers at PRTPP.The research method used is descriptive qualitative, with primary data and information obtained through questionnaires supported by interviews with PRTPP researchers. The research results concluded that the most significant causes were guaranteeing the confidentiality of data and information, the availability of archive storage space, and the security of archive access. It is necessary to make handing over hardcopies of research results archives a priority within the scope of work of the Regional Archives Services team, and it is hoped that they can synergize with PRTPP policymakers. To achieve this target, providing permanent archive storage facilities and conducting outreach to researchers is necessary. In addition, it is necessary to prepare SOPs to make it easier for researchers to collect hard copies of research results archives and a joint commitment between researchers and records managers in improving the management of research results archives in the future
Archival metadata practices and challenges in managing digital manuscripts As'ad, Muhammad; Indrawardani, Ken Fitria; Cahyaningrum, Gita Amalia; Kamajati, Dhatu
Record and Library Journal Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : D3 Perpustakaan Fakultas Vokasi Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/rlj.V11-I2.2025.359-373

Abstract

Background of the study: Metadata plays a critical role in ensuring the accessibility, interoperability, and long-term preservation of digital manuscripts within archival collections. However, inconsistent practices across institutions present significant challenges for standardization and archival sustainability. Purpose: This study aims to identify key challenges in manuscript metadata management within archival contexts and to analyze differences in practices across selected national and international repositories. Method: A qualitative descriptive approach was employed through literature review and document analysis of approximately 50 metadata records. Data were collected from five repositories—Khastara (National Library of Indonesia), BRIN Digital Repository, the British Library, Europeana, and UNESCO Memory of the World—and analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns and gaps. Findings: Repositories highlight different metadata priorities: Khastara emphasizes descriptive details, BRIN focuses on administrative and technical identifiers, the British Library provides strong provenance and historical context, Europeana prioritizes rights and interoperability, and UNESCO underscores heritage significance and preservation. These variations illustrate the archival challenges of achieving consistent metadata standards. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of cross-institutional alignment in strengthening sustainable archival metadata practices. Theoretically, it situates metadata as both a technical and cultural construct; practically, it offers insights for archival institutions to improve strategies. Future research should expand repository coverage and involve user perspectives on archival access and use.