Inayah, Clara fadhilah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS PADA SISWA INDONESIA BERDASARKAN KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR: SISTEMATIK LITERATUR REVIEW Inayah, Clara fadhilah; Dasari, Dadan
Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education
Publisher : Mathematics Education Study Program, FKIP, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/symmetry.v8i2.11009

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the results of mathematical representation ability based on the characteristics of ways of thinking. The method used in this research is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The data in this study amounted to 9 publications related to mathematical representation ability based on the characteristics of ways of thinking. The publication data are publications indexed by SINTA or Google Scholar, published in the range of 2018-2023, and located in Indonesia. The description in this study was reviewed based on the year of publication, journal index, publication media, methods used, education level of the research subject, research location, and research results. Through SLR, it was obtained that the most publications on mathematical representation ability based on the characteristics of ways of thinking occurred in 2019, repositories and Google Scholar became the publication media that published the most research, and qualitative methods became the most dominating method in this study, junior high school students became the most research subjects used as samples in this study, and the island of Java became the most dominant research location in Indonesia related to this research. In addition, it can be concluded that each student is unique in their thinking characteristics. keyword: Mathematical Representation Ability, The Characteristics of Ways of Thinking, SLR
Students’ Ways of Understanding and Ways of Thinking in Solving Trigonometric Problems Maghfiroh, Fitria; Dasari, Dadan; Dahlan, Jarnawi Afgani; Inayah, Clara Fadhilah; Fitriyah, Yuni
JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Vol 12, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/jipm.v12i2.18833

Abstract

Berpikir matematis sangat penting sebagai cara untuk mempelajari matematika. Menurut teori Harel istilah berpikir matematis tingkat lanjut berakar pada dua elemen pengetahuan: cara memahami (WoU) dan cara berpikir (WoT). Cara memahami mengacu pada bagaimana siswa menginterpretasikan suatu konsep tertentu dan hubungan antar konsep, memberikan solusi terhadap masalah, dan membenarkan apakah suatu keyakinan benar atau tidak, sedangkan cara berpikir adalah proses mental yang menghasilkan pemahaman siswa terhadap suatu hal. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menggambarkan cara siswa memahami dan berpikir dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika yang terkait dengan trigonometri. Penelitian ini dilakukan di sebuah sekolah menengah atas di Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas 11 yang telah mempelajari tentang trigonometri. Data dikumpulkan dari instrumen tes yang terdiri dari tiga masalah matematika terkait trigonometri dan hasil wawancara. Analisis data dilakukan dengan tiga tahap, yaitu teknik reduksi, penyajian, dan penarikan simpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa cara memahami dan cara berpikir siswa saling memengaruhi. Jadi, dalam masalah trigonometri ini, cara berpikir siswa memengaruhi pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep, dan sebaliknya pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep memengaruhi cara berpikir mereka. Mathematical thinking is essential as a way of learning mathematics. According to Harel’s theory in defining the term advanced mathematical thinking, it is rooted in two pieces of knowledge: ways of understanding (WoU) and ways of thinking (WoT). Ways of understanding refer to how students interpret a particular concept and the relationship between concepts, give solutions to a problem, and justify whether a belief is true or not, while ways of thinking are a mental process that results in students’ understanding of a particular thing. The purpose of this research is to describe students’ ways of understanding and ways of thinking in solving mathematical problems related to trigonometry. The research was conducted at a senior high school in Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia. The subjects of the research were the students grade 11 who has learned trigonometry. The data were collected from the test instruments consisting of three mathematical problems related to trigonometry and interview transcript. The data analysis used in this research are reduction techniques, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The result of this research showed that students’ ways of understanding and ways of thinking influenced each other. So, in this trigonometry problem, students’ ways of thinking influence the students’ understanding of the concepts, and likewise students’ understanding of the concepts affects their ways of thinking.
Indonesian Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability According To Learning Styles: Systematic Literature Review Inayah, Clara Fadhilah; Dahlan, Jarnawi A.; Darhim, Darhim; Maghfiroh, Fitria
Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/mathline.v9i3.583

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explain the outcomes of Indonesian students' mathematical representation ability according to learning styles. The learning styles are visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. A systematic literature review (SLR) is the research methodology employed in this study. This study used data from 18 papers about mathematical representation ability according to learning styles. Publications published in Indonesia between 2015 and 2023 that are indexed by Google Scholar, SINTA, or Scopus form the publishing data. According to the publication year, the media in which it was published, the research methods employed, the subject's educational background, the research location, and the research findings, the description of this study was reviewed. The most research on mathematical representation ability according to learning styles was found to have been published in 2023, according to SLR. The most prominent research media that published the most research were SINTA and Google Scholar. Qualitative methods dominated this study, with junior high school students serving as the majority of research subjects and the island of Java serving as the most prominent research location in Indonesia. Furthermore, it could be stated that one of the elements influencing mathematical representation ability is learning styles.
ANALISIS TINGKAT KOGNITIF SOAL PADA BUKU PENDAMPING MATEMATIKA MATERI SPLDV KELAS VIII BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM REVISI Inayah, Clara Fadhilah; Siagian, Teddy Alfra; Irsal, Nur Aliyyah
JP2MS Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Agustus
Publisher : Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jp2ms.6.2.226-238

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sebaran tingkat kognitif soal pada buku Pendamping Matematika SMP kelas VIII Terbitan Erlangga materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Taksnomi Bloom Revisi yang digunakan, yaitu dimensi proses kognitif yang meliputi: mengingat (C1), memahami (C2), mengaplikasikan (C3), menganalisis (C4), mengevaluasi (C5), dan mencipta (C6). Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatitf. Sumber data penelitian pada penelitian ini adalah soal pilihan ganda dan soal esai materi SPLDV pada buku pendamping matematika kelas VIII. Soal-soal pilihan ganda dan esai yang dianalisis berjumlah 110 soal dengan tingkat kognitif mengenali (C1) sebanyak 2 soal (1,81%), mengaplikasikan (C3) sebanyak 99 soal ( 90%), menganalisis (C4) sebanyak 9 soal (8,18%) serta tidak adanya tingkat kognitif memahami (C2), mengevaluasi (C5) dan mencipta (C6). Soal pilihan ganda dan esai pada SLPDV ini mendominasi pada tingkat kognitif mengaplikasikan (C3). Sehingga, didapat bahwa sebaran tingkat kognitif soal pilihan ganda dan soal esai materi SPLDV belum proporsional.